<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Latest Archives - Pro Football Mania</title>
	<atom:link href="https://profootballmania.com/category/latest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://profootballmania.com/category/latest/</link>
	<description>NFL Team Rankings, Ratings and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 17:23:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">216258887</site>	<item>
		<title>One Grade Away: 5 NFL Teams That Could Jump Tiers</title>
		<link>https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/19/one-grade-away-5-nfl-teams-that-could-jump-tiers/</link>
					<comments>https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/19/one-grade-away-5-nfl-teams-that-could-jump-tiers/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin Fuhr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 17:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PFM Ratings]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://profootballmania.com/?p=54584</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>PFM Ratings Five NFL teams are one answer away from changing how PFM sees them before Week 1. Each has a clear football question that could move its outlook up a tier. Denver needs more explosive plays. Washington needs its defense to take pressure off Jayden Daniels. Minnesota needs Kyler Murray to settle the quarterback [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/19/one-grade-away-5-nfl-teams-that-could-jump-tiers/">One Grade Away: 5 NFL Teams That Could Jump Tiers</a> appeared first on <a href="https://profootballmania.com">Pro Football Mania</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<style>
.pfm-one-grade-away{
  --pfm-red:#8b0f1a;
  --pfm-gold:#d6a313;
  --pfm-ink:#101724;
  --pfm-copy:#3f4b5c;
  --pfm-muted:#697586;
  --pfm-border:#dfe5ec;
  --pfm-soft:#f6f8fb;
  --pfm-radius:16px;
  width:100%;
  max-width:920px;
  margin:0 auto;
  color:var(--pfm-ink);
  overflow-wrap:break-word;
  font-size:17px;
  line-height:1.68;
}
.pfm-one-grade-away *{box-sizing:border-box}
.pfm-one-grade-away p{margin:0 0 1.05rem;color:var(--pfm-copy)}
.pfm-one-grade-away h2{
  margin:2.35rem 0 .8rem;
  color:var(--pfm-ink);
  font-size:clamp(1.55rem,3vw,2.1rem);
  font-weight:900;
  letter-spacing:-.025em;
  line-height:1.15;
  text-transform:none;
}
.pfm-one-grade-away h3{
  margin:0 0 .55rem;
  color:var(--pfm-ink);
  font-size:1.1rem;
  font-weight:900;
  line-height:1.3;
}
.pfm-one-grade-away a{color:var(--pfm-red);font-weight:800;text-decoration-thickness:1px;text-underline-offset:2px;overflow-wrap:anywhere}
.pfm-one-grade-away img{max-width:100%;height:auto}
.pfm-oga-kicker{
  margin:0 0 .7rem!important;
  color:var(--pfm-red)!important;
  font-size:.76rem;
  font-weight:900;
  letter-spacing:.09em;
  text-transform:uppercase;
}
.pfm-oga-deck{
  margin-bottom:1rem!important;
  color:var(--pfm-ink)!important;
  font-size:1.12rem;
  font-weight:750;
  line-height:1.55;
}
.pfm-oga-context{
  margin:1.45rem 0 1.8rem;
  padding:15px 17px;
  border-left:4px solid var(--pfm-red);
  background:var(--pfm-soft);
  border-radius:0 10px 10px 0;
}
.pfm-oga-context p{margin:0!important;font-size:.95rem}
.pfm-oga-table-wrap{
  width:100%;
  margin:1.65rem 0 2.15rem;
  overflow-x:auto;
  border:1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  border-radius:12px;
  background:#fff;
  -webkit-overflow-scrolling:touch;
  scrollbar-width:thin;
}
.pfm-oga-table-wrap:focus-visible{outline:3px solid rgba(214,163,19,.65);outline-offset:3px}
.pfm-oga-table{
  width:100%;
  min-width:720px;
  margin:0;
  border-collapse:collapse;
  border-spacing:0;
  border:0!important;
  background:#fff;
  box-shadow:none!important;
}
.pfm-oga-table th,
.pfm-oga-table td{
  padding:12px 13px;
  border-top:0!important;
  border-right:0!important;
  border-bottom:1px solid #edf1f5!important;
  border-left:0!important;
  text-align:left;
  vertical-align:middle;
}
.pfm-oga-table th{
  background:#f8fafc;
  color:#475569;
  font-size:.72rem;
  font-weight:900;
  letter-spacing:.07em;
  text-transform:uppercase;
  white-space:nowrap;
}
.pfm-oga-table td{color:#233247;font-size:.9rem}
.pfm-oga-table tbody tr:last-child td{border-bottom:0!important}
.pfm-oga-team-cell{display:flex;align-items:center;gap:9px;min-width:190px;font-weight:900;color:var(--pfm-ink)}
.pfm-oga-team-cell img{width:32px!important;height:32px!important;max-width:none!important;object-fit:contain;flex:0 0 32px}
.pfm-oga-gap{font-weight:900;color:var(--pfm-red)}
.pfm-oga-section{
  --team-primary:var(--pfm-red);
  --team-accent:var(--pfm-gold);
  margin:2.15rem 0 0;
  padding-top:.15rem;
}
.pfm-oga-team--den{--team-primary:#002244;--team-accent:#fb4f14}
.pfm-oga-team--was{--team-primary:#5a1414;--team-accent:#ffb612}
.pfm-oga-team--min{--team-primary:#4f2683;--team-accent:#ffc62f}
.pfm-oga-team--mia{--team-primary:#005778;--team-accent:#fc4c02}
.pfm-oga-team--cle{--team-primary:#311d00;--team-accent:#ff3c00}
.pfm-oga-team-heading{display:flex;align-items:center;gap:13px;margin-bottom:.45rem}
.pfm-oga-team-heading img{width:54px!important;height:54px!important;max-width:none!important;object-fit:contain;flex:0 0 54px}
.pfm-oga-team-heading h2{min-width:0;margin:0}
.pfm-oga-snapshot{display:flex;flex-wrap:wrap;gap:8px;margin:.85rem 0 1.05rem}
.pfm-oga-snapshot span{
  display:inline-flex;
  align-items:center;
  min-height:32px;
  padding:6px 9px;
  border:1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  border-radius:8px;
  background:var(--pfm-soft);
  color:#344054;
  font-size:.8rem;
  font-weight:800;
}
.pfm-oga-snapshot .pfm-oga-score{
  border:2px solid var(--team-accent)!important;
  background:var(--team-primary)!important;
  color:#fff!important;
  font-weight:900;
  box-shadow:0 2px 7px rgba(16,23,36,.14);
}
.pfm-oga-swing{
  margin:1rem 0 1.15rem;
  padding:14px 16px;
  border:1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  border-left:4px solid var(--pfm-red);
  border-radius:10px;
  background:#fff;
}
.pfm-oga-swing strong{
  display:block;
  margin-bottom:3px;
  color:var(--pfm-red);
  font-size:.74rem;
  font-weight:900;
  letter-spacing:.075em;
  text-transform:uppercase;
}
.pfm-oga-linkline{margin-top:.9rem!important;font-size:.92rem}
.pfm-oga-callout{
  margin:2.25rem 0;
  padding:20px;
  border:1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  border-radius:var(--pfm-radius);
  background:var(--pfm-soft);
}
.pfm-oga-callout p:last-child{margin-bottom:0}
.pfm-oga-cta{
  margin:2.35rem 0 1.4rem;
  padding:22px;
  border:1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  border-top:5px solid var(--pfm-red);
  border-radius:var(--pfm-radius);
  background:#fff;
  text-align:center;
}
.pfm-oga-cta p{margin-bottom:14px!important;color:var(--pfm-ink)!important}
.pfm-one-grade-away .pfm-oga-cta a,
.pfm-one-grade-away .pfm-oga-cta a:visited{
  display:inline-flex;
  align-items:center;
  justify-content:center;
  min-height:44px;
  padding:10px 16px;
  border:0!important;
  border-radius:8px;
  background:var(--pfm-red)!important;
  color:#fff!important;
  -webkit-text-fill-color:#fff!important;
  text-decoration:none!important;
  box-shadow:none!important;
}
.pfm-one-grade-away .pfm-oga-cta a:hover,
.pfm-one-grade-away .pfm-oga-cta a:focus-visible{
  background:#6f0c15!important;
  color:#fff!important;
  -webkit-text-fill-color:#fff!important;
}
.pfm-one-grade-away .pfm-oga-cta a:focus-visible{outline:3px solid rgba(214,163,19,.65);outline-offset:3px}
.pfm-oga-sources{
  margin-top:2.4rem;
  padding-top:1.3rem;
  border-top:1px solid var(--pfm-border);
}
.pfm-oga-sources summary{
  display:flex;
  align-items:center;
  justify-content:space-between;
  gap:14px;
  padding:4px 0 10px;
  color:var(--pfm-ink);
  cursor:pointer;
  font-size:1rem;
  font-weight:900;
  line-height:1.35;
  list-style:none;
}
.pfm-oga-sources summary::-webkit-details-marker{display:none}
.pfm-oga-sources summary::after{
  content:"+";
  display:inline-flex;
  align-items:center;
  justify-content:center;
  width:30px;
  height:30px;
  flex:0 0 30px;
  border:1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  border-radius:999px;
  color:var(--pfm-red);
  font-size:1.15rem;
  line-height:1;
}
.pfm-oga-sources[open] summary::after{content:"\2212"}
.pfm-oga-sources summary:focus-visible{outline:3px solid rgba(214,163,19,.65);outline-offset:3px;border-radius:4px}
.pfm-oga-sources ul{margin:.5rem 0 0;padding-left:1.15rem}
.pfm-oga-sources li{margin:.45rem 0;color:var(--pfm-copy);font-size:.88rem}
.pfm-oga-freshness{margin-top:1rem!important;color:var(--pfm-muted)!important;font-size:.82rem}
@media (max-width:700px){
  .pfm-one-grade-away{font-size:16px}
  .pfm-oga-table-wrap{overflow:visible;border:0;border-radius:0;background:transparent}
  .pfm-oga-table{min-width:0;border-collapse:separate;border-spacing:0;background:transparent}
  .pfm-oga-table thead{position:absolute;width:1px;height:1px;margin:-1px;padding:0;overflow:hidden;clip:rect(0 0 0 0);clip-path:inset(50%);white-space:nowrap;border:0}
  .pfm-oga-table tbody,.pfm-oga-table tr,.pfm-oga-table td{display:block;width:100%}
  .pfm-oga-table tr{overflow:hidden;margin:0;border:1px solid var(--pfm-border);border-radius:12px;background:#fff}
  .pfm-oga-table tr + tr{margin-top:10px}
  .pfm-oga-table td{display:grid;grid-template-columns:minmax(96px,112px) minmax(0,1fr);gap:12px;padding:9px 12px;border-bottom:1px solid #edf1f5!important;font-size:.86rem}
  .pfm-oga-table td > *{min-width:0}
  .pfm-oga-table td:last-child{border-bottom:0}
  .pfm-oga-table td::before{content:attr(data-label);color:#697586;font-size:.68rem;font-weight:900;letter-spacing:.055em;text-transform:uppercase}
  .pfm-oga-table td.pfm-oga-team{padding-top:12px;color:var(--pfm-ink)}
  .pfm-oga-team-cell{min-width:0}
  .pfm-oga-team-cell img{width:30px;height:30px;flex-basis:30px}
  .pfm-oga-team-heading{align-items:flex-start;gap:10px}
  .pfm-oga-team-heading img{width:44px;height:44px;flex-basis:44px}
  .pfm-oga-team-heading h2{font-size:1.45rem}
  .pfm-oga-snapshot{gap:6px}
  .pfm-oga-snapshot span{font-size:.76rem}
  .pfm-oga-cta{padding:18px}
  .pfm-oga-cta a{display:flex;width:100%}
}
@media (max-width:390px){
  .pfm-oga-table td{grid-template-columns:88px minmax(0,1fr);gap:9px;padding:9px 10px}
  .pfm-oga-swing,.pfm-oga-context{padding-right:13px;padding-left:13px}
}
@media (prefers-reduced-motion:reduce){
  .pfm-one-grade-away *{scroll-behavior:auto!important;transition:none!important}
}
</style>

<article class="pfm-one-grade-away">

  <p class="pfm-oga-kicker">PFM Ratings</p>

  <p class="pfm-oga-deck">Five NFL teams are one answer away from changing how PFM sees them before Week 1. Each has a clear football question that could move its outlook up a tier.</p>

  <p>Denver needs more explosive plays. Washington needs its defense to take pressure off Jayden Daniels. Minnesota needs Kyler Murray to settle the quarterback position. Miami needs more big plays from the passing game and Cleveland still needs somebody to win the starting job.</p>

  <p>None of them needs a perfect August. Each sits within 1.1 PFM points of a better outlook tier. If those areas look different by Week 1, the rankings could move too.</p>

  <div class="pfm-oga-table-wrap" role="region" aria-label="PFM teams close to a new outlook tier" tabindex="0">
    <table class="pfm-oga-table">
      <thead>
        <tr>
          <th scope="col">Team</th>
          <th scope="col">PFM Rank</th>
          <th scope="col">PFM Score</th>
          <th scope="col">Next Outlook</th>
          <th scope="col">Gap</th>
          <th scope="col">Grade to Watch</th>
        </tr>
      </thead>
      <tbody>
        <tr>
          <td class="pfm-oga-team" data-label="Team"><span class="pfm-oga-team-cell"><img loading="lazy" src="/images/teams/den.png" alt="Denver Broncos logo" width="32" height="32" loading="lazy" decoding="async"><span>Denver Broncos</span></span></td>
          <td data-label="PFM Rank">No. 9</td>
          <td data-label="PFM Score">85.1</td>
          <td data-label="Next Outlook">Super Bowl Contender</td>
          <td class="pfm-oga-gap" data-label="Gap">0.9</td>
          <td data-label="Grade to Watch">Explosiveness 74.8</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <td class="pfm-oga-team" data-label="Team"><span class="pfm-oga-team-cell"><img loading="lazy" src="/images/teams/was.png" alt="Washington Commanders logo" width="32" height="32" loading="lazy" decoding="async"><span>Washington Commanders</span></span></td>
          <td data-label="PFM Rank">No. 18</td>
          <td data-label="PFM Score">79.0</td>
          <td data-label="Next Outlook">Playoff Contender</td>
          <td class="pfm-oga-gap" data-label="Gap">1.0</td>
          <td data-label="Grade to Watch">Defense 75.4</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <td class="pfm-oga-team" data-label="Team"><span class="pfm-oga-team-cell"><img loading="lazy" src="/images/teams/min.png" alt="Minnesota Vikings logo" width="32" height="32" loading="lazy" decoding="async"><span>Minnesota Vikings</span></span></td>
          <td data-label="PFM Rank">No. 19</td>
          <td data-label="PFM Score">78.9</td>
          <td data-label="Next Outlook">Playoff Contender</td>
          <td class="pfm-oga-gap" data-label="Gap">1.1</td>
          <td data-label="Grade to Watch">QB Stability 76.4</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <td class="pfm-oga-team" data-label="Team"><span class="pfm-oga-team-cell"><img loading="lazy" src="/images/teams/mia.png" alt="Miami Dolphins logo" width="32" height="32" loading="lazy" decoding="async"><span>Miami Dolphins</span></span></td>
          <td data-label="PFM Rank">No. 24</td>
          <td data-label="PFM Score">75.2</td>
          <td data-label="Next Outlook">In the Playoff Mix</td>
          <td class="pfm-oga-gap" data-label="Gap">0.8</td>
          <td data-label="Grade to Watch">Explosiveness 70.2</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <td class="pfm-oga-team" data-label="Team"><span class="pfm-oga-team-cell"><img loading="lazy" src="/images/teams/cle.png" alt="Cleveland Browns logo" width="32" height="32" loading="lazy" decoding="async"><span>Cleveland Browns</span></span></td>
          <td data-label="PFM Rank">No. 30</td>
          <td data-label="PFM Score">71.4</td>
          <td data-label="Next Outlook">Needs More Help</td>
          <td class="pfm-oga-gap" data-label="Gap">0.6</td>
          <td data-label="Grade to Watch">QB Stability 67.0</td>
        </tr>
      </tbody>
    </table>
  </div>

  <section class="pfm-oga-section pfm-oga-team--den">
    <div class="pfm-oga-team-heading">
      <img loading="lazy" src="/images/teams/den.png" alt="Denver Broncos logo" width="54" height="54" loading="lazy" decoding="async">
      <h2>Denver Is Good Enough. Now the Offense Needs More Easy Yards.</h2>
    </div>

    <div class="pfm-oga-snapshot">
      <span class="pfm-oga-score">PFM Score 85.1</span>
      <span>PFM No. 9</span>
      <span>84.6 Defense</span>
      <span>85.0 Coaching</span>
      <span>74.8 Explosiveness</span>
    </div>

    <p>Denver does not need to reinvent itself. Sean Payton gives the Broncos one of the better coaching situations in football and the defense built around Patrick Surtain II is already No. 4 in PFM.</p>

    <p>The problem is that the offense can still make every scoring drive look harder than it needs to be.</p>

    <p>That is where Jaylen Waddle comes in. Denver traded for the type of receiver it was missing, somebody who can turn one throw into 40 yards and punish a defense for creeping forward. Bo Nix has already flashed more of that downfield game in camp. Now it has to become part of the offense instead of an occasional bonus.</p>

    <p>PFM learned something about Denver last season too. We were too low on the Broncos. They went 14-3 and reached the AFC Championship Game while the Explosiveness grade kept dragging down everything else they did well. The concern was fair. We gave it too much weight in the final read.</p>

    <div class="pfm-oga-swing">
      <strong>What gets Denver over the line?</strong>
      Denver is only 0.9 points from PFM&#8217;s Super Bowl Contender range. If Nix and Waddle give this offense a real quick-strike element, there is not much left to argue about. The defense is good. The coaching is good. The Broncos just need fewer drives where everything has to go right for ten plays in a row.
    </div>

    <p class="pfm-oga-linkline"><a href="https://profootballmania.com/nfl-team-dashboards/denver-broncos/">See the Denver Broncos PFM Team Dashboard &rarr;</a></p>
  </section>

  <section class="pfm-oga-section pfm-oga-team--was">
    <div class="pfm-oga-team-heading">
      <img loading="lazy" src="/images/teams/was.png" alt="Washington Commanders logo" width="54" height="54" loading="lazy" decoding="async">
      <h2>Washington Cannot Keep Asking Daniels to Clean Up Everything</h2>
    </div>

    <div class="pfm-oga-snapshot">
      <span class="pfm-oga-score">PFM Score 79.0</span>
      <span>PFM No. 18</span>
      <span>84.8 QB Stability</span>
      <span>81.9 Offense</span>
      <span>75.4 Defense</span>
    </div>

    <p>Jayden Daniels already gives Washington the hardest thing to find in the NFL. He can beat a defense from the pocket, extend the play when it breaks down and punish them with his legs.</p>

    <p>That makes the 75.4 Defense grade more important than squeezing another point out of the offense.</p>

    <p>The Commanders went after the problem. Odafe Oweh gives Daronte Jones a real edge rusher and Rasul Douglas adds size and ball production to the secondary. There have been encouraging camp stretches too, especially when the front has been able to speed up the quarterback.</p>

    <p>That is the part Washington still has to show. If this defense can move from a concern into the middle of the league, Daniels will not have to continue to carry this team on his back.</p>

    <p><strong>Washington is one point from the Playoff Contender range.</strong> The Commanders do not need a dominant defense to get there. They need one that can hold a lead, get off the field and give the offense a few extra possessions.</p>

    <p>Washington&#8217;s ceiling still rises fastest if the defense finally carries some of the weight.</p>

    <p class="pfm-oga-linkline"><a href="https://profootballmania.com/nfl-team-dashboards/washington-commanders/">See the Washington Commanders PFM Team Dashboard &rarr;</a></p>
  </section>

  <section class="pfm-oga-section pfm-oga-team--min">
    <div class="pfm-oga-team-heading">
      <img loading="lazy" src="/images/teams/min.png" alt="Minnesota Vikings logo" width="54" height="54" loading="lazy" decoding="async">
      <h2>Minnesota Picked Its Quarterback. That Does Not Make the QB Question Go Away.</h2>
    </div>

    <div class="pfm-oga-snapshot">
      <span class="pfm-oga-score">PFM Score 78.9</span>
      <span>PFM No. 19</span>
      <span>76.4 QB Stability</span>
      <span>82.2 Coaching</span>
      <span>80.2 Defense</span>
    </div>

    <p>Kyler Murray won the job. Minnesota no longer has to spend the rest of August pretending the competition is still wide open.</p>

    <p>Naming Murray the starter does not suddenly make a 76.4 QB Stability grade look safe.</p>

    <p>Murray played five games last season because of a foot injury and J.J. McCarthy is now sitting behind him after losing the competition. The question is no longer <em>who starts?</em> It is whether Murray can stay on the field and give Kevin O&#8217;Connell steady quarterback play.</p>

    <p>There is enough around Murray to make that work. Justin Jefferson can erase a bad read with one route and O&#8217;Connell has already shown he can build an offense around different quarterbacks. Minnesota does not need Murray to carry this team which happened far too often in Arizona.</p>

    <p>So what would actually move Minnesota? Murray staying healthy and looking comfortable in O&#8217;Connell&#8217;s offense. If that happens, the biggest question on the roster stops being the thing holding the Vikings back.</p>

    <p class="pfm-oga-linkline"><a href="https://profootballmania.com/nfl-team-dashboards/minnesota-vikings/">See the Minnesota Vikings PFM Team Dashboard &rarr;</a></p>
  </section>

  <section class="pfm-oga-section pfm-oga-team--mia">
    <div class="pfm-oga-team-heading">
      <img loading="lazy" src="/images/teams/mia.png" alt="Miami Dolphins logo" width="54" height="54" loading="lazy" decoding="async">
      <h2>How Is a Team With Achane and Willis 26th in Explosiveness?</h2>
    </div>

    <div class="pfm-oga-snapshot">
      <span class="pfm-oga-score">PFM Score 75.2</span>
      <span>PFM No. 24</span>
      <span>78.0 Offense</span>
      <span>70.2 Explosiveness</span>
    </div>

    <p>De&#8217;Von Achane is one of the fastest backs in football. Malik Willis adds another runner defenses have to account for. Miami&#8217;s opening preseason drive went 93 yards for a touchdown and Willis completed 4 of 5 passes.</p>

    <p>So why is Explosiveness sitting at 70.2?</p>

    <p>Because having fast players is not the same as consistently creating explosive plays. Miami lost Jaylen Waddle and Tyreek Hill from the receiver room and Bobby Slowik is rebuilding the offense around a very different quarterback. Achane can still rip a game open but the Dolphins need another player to scare a defense.</p>

    <p>Miami is only 0.8 points from the In the Playoff Mix range. If Willis starts creating big plays outside the structure and the new receiver group gives him another way to flip the field, this offense gets a lot more interesting.</p>

    <p class="pfm-oga-linkline"><a href="https://profootballmania.com/nfl-team-dashboards/miami-dolphins/">See the Miami Dolphins PFM Team Dashboard &rarr;</a></p>
  </section>

  <section class="pfm-oga-section pfm-oga-team--cle">
    <div class="pfm-oga-team-heading">
      <img loading="lazy" src="/images/teams/cle.png" alt="Cleveland Browns logo" width="54" height="54" loading="lazy" decoding="async">
      <h2>Cleveland Has an 84.2 Defense and Still Sits No. 30</h2>
    </div>

    <div class="pfm-oga-snapshot">
      <span class="pfm-oga-score">PFM Score 71.4</span>
      <span>PFM No. 30</span>
      <span>84.2 Defense</span>
      <span>76.6 Roster</span>
      <span>67.0 QB Stability</span>
    </div>

    <p>That should tell you where the problem is.</p>

    <p>Cleveland has enough defense to make life miserable for good teams and this is not the 30th-best collection of talent in football. The Browns are No. 30 because nobody has made the quarterback job feel safe.</p>

    <p>Deshaun Watson&#8217;s first preseason game back was fine. He completed 11 of 15 passes for 126 yards and lost a fumble. Shedeur Sanders had an uneven opener of his own. The job still does not feel settled though.</p>

    <p>The Browns should keep the competition going until somebody takes the job. Naming a starter just to end the battle does nothing for a 67.0 QB Stability grade.</p>

    <div class="pfm-oga-swing">
      <strong>What gets Cleveland out of the bottom tier?</strong>
      One of these quarterbacks has to make Todd Monken&#8217;s decision easy. Cleveland does not need elite quarterback play to climb out of this tier. It needs an offense that gives an 84.2 defense a chance instead of asking that defense to carry the whole season.
    </div>

    <p>Moving above 72 would still leave Cleveland with work to do but it would get the Browns out of PFM&#8217;s bottom outlook tier. With this defense, competent quarterback play is enough to raise the floor.</p>

    <p class="pfm-oga-linkline"><a href="https://profootballmania.com/nfl-team-dashboards/cleveland-browns/">See the Cleveland Browns PFM Team Dashboard &rarr;</a></p>
  </section>

  <aside class="pfm-oga-callout">
    <h3>Which One Would We Buy First?</h3>

    <p><strong>Denver.</strong> The Broncos are already No. 9 and the things PFM trusts most are hard to fake. Payton can coach. The defense can win downs. Nix is healthy. Waddle gives the offense the one thing that still looks missing.</p>

    <p><strong>Washington is the more interesting bet.</strong> Daniels gives the Commanders enough offense to win right now. If the revamped pass rush and secondary make 75.4 look too low by September, Washington goes from being in the mix to a team nobody wants to see.</p>

    <p>Minnesota has the quarterback decision out of the way. Miami has to turn speed into production. Cleveland is still waiting for somebody to take the job.</p>
  </aside>

  <h2>What Could Change Before Week 1</h2>

  <p>A preseason final score is not changing a PFM rating by itself. Neither is one touchdown drive or one ugly quarter.</p>

  <p>If August gives us real answers there, then the tiers should move.</p>

  <div class="pfm-oga-cta">
    <p><strong>See where all 32 teams stand before Week 1.</strong></p>
    <a href="https://profootballmania.com/nfl-team-rankings/">View the Latest PFM NFL Rankings &rarr;</a>
  </div>

  <p class="pfm-oga-freshness">PFM ratings referenced in this article were re-checked August 19, 2026. NFL preseason, injury and roster context was re-checked August 19, 2026.</p>

  <details class="pfm-oga-sources">
    <summary>Sources Reviewed for Current NFL Context</summary>
    <ul>
      <li><a href="https://www.denverbroncos.com/news/broncos-camp-preview-how-will-the-addition-of-wr-jaylen-waddle-elevate-denver-s-passing-game">Denver Broncos: Jaylen Waddle and the offense&#8217;s explosiveness</a></li>
      <li><a href="https://www.commanders.com/news/commanders-training-camp-standouts-2026-treylon-burks-odafe-oweh">Washington Commanders: Odafe Oweh and Rasul Douglas camp work</a></li>
      <li><a href="https://www.reuters.com/sports/report-vikings-tab-qb-kyler-murray-starter-over-jj-mccarthy--flm-2026-08-11/">Reuters: Vikings name Kyler Murray starting quarterback</a></li>
      <li><a href="https://www.reuters.com/sports/nfl-preseason-roundup-new-look-dolphins-offense-finds-stride--flm-2026-08-15/">Reuters: Dolphins preseason opener and Malik Willis&#8217; first drive</a></li>
      <li><a href="https://www.reuters.com/sports/nfl-roundup-josh-allen-bills-open-up-highmark-stadium-style--flm-2026-08-15/">Reuters: Browns preseason opener and Deshaun Watson return</a></li>
    </ul>
  </details>

</article>
<p>The post <a href="https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/19/one-grade-away-5-nfl-teams-that-could-jump-tiers/">One Grade Away: 5 NFL Teams That Could Jump Tiers</a> appeared first on <a href="https://profootballmania.com">Pro Football Mania</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/19/one-grade-away-5-nfl-teams-that-could-jump-tiers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">54584</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consensus Power Rankings: Commanders Ranked 29th?</title>
		<link>https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/18/consensus-power-rankings-commanders-ranked-29th/</link>
					<comments>https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/18/consensus-power-rankings-commanders-ranked-29th/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Fuhr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 23:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://profootballmania.com/?p=54458</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve updated our Consensus Power Rankings and one ranking stood out. The Commanders are listed as the 29th best team in the league according to NFL.com. Have we not forgot that this team played in the NFC Championship game against the Philadelphia Eagles just 2 years ago? Now that was just one year and in [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/18/consensus-power-rankings-commanders-ranked-29th/">Consensus Power Rankings: Commanders Ranked 29th?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://profootballmania.com">Pro Football Mania</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We&#8217;ve updated our <a href="https://profootballmania.com/nfl-consensus-power-rankings/" data-type="link" data-id="https://profootballmania.com/nfl-consensus-power-rankings/">Consensus Power Rankings</a> and one ranking stood out. The Commanders are listed as the 29th best team in the league according to NFL.com. Have we not forgot that this team played in the NFC Championship game against the Philadelphia Eagles just 2 years ago? </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Now that was just one year and in the last 26 years they&#8217;ve only been to the playoffs 5 times but still. When Jayden Daniels is healthy, and he has his weapons, this team is a 8-10 win team. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In addition to their potent offense they have sured up a lot of positions on defense, to include the coveted rookie Sonny Styles. The addition of Stefon Diggs is also promising for this team to be successful. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Even with Marcus Mariota, this team is not 29th and more like low 20&#8217;s or a little higher. Now, they do have a very tough schedule but even then they are around a .500 team or better. I think this ranking is somewhat disrespectful and I full expect the Commanders to play well above that 29th ranking as we start this 2026 season.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/18/consensus-power-rankings-commanders-ranked-29th/">Consensus Power Rankings: Commanders Ranked 29th?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://profootballmania.com">Pro Football Mania</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/18/consensus-power-rankings-commanders-ranked-29th/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">54458</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Actually Wins Fantasy Football Leagues? 5 Years of Championship Data</title>
		<link>https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/17/fantasy-football-draft-strategy-championship-data/</link>
					<comments>https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/17/fantasy-football-draft-strategy-championship-data/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin Fuhr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 15:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Fantasy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://profootballmania.com/?p=54518</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>PFM Fantasy Research Every August we argue about Zero RB, Hero RB, when to draft a quarterback, whether tight end is worth paying for and which late picks can win a league. Most of that starts with projections. This time we went backward. PFM pulled five years of championship roster data and lined it up [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/17/fantasy-football-draft-strategy-championship-data/">What Actually Wins Fantasy Football Leagues? 5 Years of Championship Data</a> appeared first on <a href="https://profootballmania.com">Pro Football Mania</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<style>
.pfm-champ-research,
.pfm-champ-research * {
  box-sizing: border-box;
}

.pfm-champ-research {
  --pfm-navy: #0f2742;
  --pfm-red: #8b0f1a;
  --pfm-red-dark: #6f0c15;
  --pfm-gold: #d6a313;
  --pfm-ink: #172033;
  --pfm-copy: #354056;
  --pfm-muted: #64748b;
  --pfm-border: #dfe4ec;
  --pfm-soft: #f8fafc;
  color: var(--pfm-ink);
  font-family: Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", Arial, sans-serif;
}

.pfm-champ-research p,
.pfm-champ-research li {
  font-size: 17px;
  line-height: 1.68;
}

.pfm-champ-research p {
  margin: 0 0 1.15em;
  color: var(--pfm-copy);
}

.pfm-champ-research a {
  color: var(--pfm-red);
  font-weight: 800;
  text-decoration-thickness: 2px;
  text-underline-offset: 3px;
}

.pfm-champ-research a:hover,
.pfm-champ-research a:focus {
  color: var(--pfm-red-dark);
}

.pfm-champ-research a:focus-visible,
.pfm-champ-research summary:focus-visible {
  outline: 3px solid rgba(214, 163, 19, .65);
  outline-offset: 3px;
}

.pfm-champ-kicker {
  display: inline-block;
  margin: 4px 0 12px;
  color: var(--pfm-red);
  font-size: 12px;
  line-height: 1.3;
  font-weight: 950;
  letter-spacing: .1em;
  text-transform: uppercase;
}

.pfm-champ-lede {
  margin: 0 0 1.15em !important;
  color: var(--pfm-navy) !important;
  font-size: clamp(20px, 2.5vw, 24px) !important;
  line-height: 1.55 !important;
  font-weight: 800 !important;
}

.pfm-champ-note,
.pfm-champ-callout,
.pfm-champ-final {
  margin: 26px 0 34px;
  padding: 20px 22px;
  border: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  border-left: 5px solid var(--pfm-red);
  border-radius: 14px;
  background: #fff;
  box-shadow: 0 8px 22px rgba(15, 23, 42, .05);
}

.pfm-champ-note p,
.pfm-champ-callout p,
.pfm-champ-final p {
  margin: 0 0 10px !important;
  font-size: 15px !important;
  line-height: 1.62 !important;
}

.pfm-champ-note p:last-child,
.pfm-champ-callout p:last-child,
.pfm-champ-final p:last-child {
  margin-bottom: 0 !important;
}

.pfm-champ-note strong,
.pfm-champ-callout strong,
.pfm-champ-final strong {
  color: var(--pfm-navy);
}

.pfm-champ-callout {
  border-left-color: var(--pfm-gold);
  background: #fffaf0;
}


.pfm-champ-section {
  margin: 0;
  padding: 38px 0 42px;
  border-top: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
}

.pfm-champ-section h2 {
  margin: 0 0 16px !important;
  color: var(--pfm-navy) !important;
  font-size: clamp(28px, 4vw, 38px) !important;
  line-height: 1.1 !important;
  font-weight: 950 !important;
  letter-spacing: -.035em !important;
  text-transform: none !important;
}

.pfm-champ-section h3 {
  margin: 28px 0 10px !important;
  color: var(--pfm-navy) !important;
  font-size: clamp(21px, 3vw, 26px) !important;
  line-height: 1.2 !important;
  font-weight: 900 !important;
  letter-spacing: -.02em !important;
}

.pfm-champ-big-number {
  display: grid;
  grid-template-columns: 150px minmax(0, 1fr);
  gap: 20px;
  align-items: center;
  margin: 25px 0 30px;
  padding: 22px;
  border: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  border-radius: 16px;
  background: var(--pfm-soft);
}

.pfm-champ-big-number strong {
  color: var(--pfm-red);
  font-size: clamp(48px, 8vw, 68px);
  line-height: .95;
  font-weight: 950;
  letter-spacing: -.05em;
}

.pfm-champ-big-number p {
  margin: 0 !important;
  color: var(--pfm-navy) !important;
  font-size: 18px !important;
  line-height: 1.48 !important;
  font-weight: 800 !important;
}

.pfm-champ-chart {
  margin: 26px 0 32px;
  padding: 22px;
  border: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  border-radius: 16px;
  background: #fff;
  box-shadow: 0 9px 24px rgba(15, 23, 42, .045);
}

.pfm-champ-chart-title {
  margin: 0 0 6px !important;
  color: var(--pfm-navy) !important;
  font-size: 18px !important;
  line-height: 1.35 !important;
  font-weight: 950 !important;
}

.pfm-champ-chart-sub {
  margin: 0 0 18px !important;
  color: var(--pfm-muted) !important;
  font-size: 13px !important;
  line-height: 1.45 !important;
}

.pfm-champ-bar-row {
  display: grid;
  grid-template-columns: 118px minmax(0, 1fr) 64px;
  gap: 12px;
  align-items: center;
  margin: 11px 0;
}

.pfm-champ-bar-label {
  color: var(--pfm-ink);
  font-size: 13px;
  font-weight: 850;
}

.pfm-champ-bar-track {
  height: 13px;
  overflow: hidden;
  border-radius: 999px;
  background: #e9edf3;
}

.pfm-champ-bar-fill {
  height: 100%;
  min-width: 3px;
  border-radius: inherit;
  background: var(--pfm-red);
}

.pfm-champ-bar-row.is-mid .pfm-champ-bar-fill {
  background: var(--pfm-gold);
}

.pfm-champ-bar-value {
  color: var(--pfm-navy);
  font-size: 13px;
  font-weight: 950;
  text-align: right;
}

.pfm-champ-table-wrap {
  width: 100%;
  margin: 24px 0 30px;
  overflow-x: auto;
  -webkit-overflow-scrolling: touch;
  border: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  border-radius: 14px;
  background: #fff;
}

.pfm-champ-table {
  width: 100%;
  min-width: 650px;
  border-collapse: collapse;
  border-spacing: 0;
  margin: 0 !important;
}

.pfm-champ-table th,
.pfm-champ-table td {
  padding: 13px 14px;
  border: 0;
  border-bottom: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  text-align: left;
  vertical-align: middle;
  white-space: nowrap;
}

.pfm-champ-table thead th {
  background: var(--pfm-navy);
  color: #fff;
  font-size: 12px;
  line-height: 1.3;
  font-weight: 950;
  letter-spacing: .05em;
  text-transform: uppercase;
}

.pfm-champ-table tbody td {
  color: var(--pfm-copy);
  font-size: 14px;
  line-height: 1.45;
  font-weight: 650;
}

.pfm-champ-table tbody tr:last-child td {
  border-bottom: 0;
}

.pfm-champ-table tbody td:first-child,
.pfm-champ-table tbody td:nth-child(2) {
  color: var(--pfm-navy);
  font-weight: 850;
}

.pfm-champ-qb-grid {
  display: grid;
  grid-template-columns: repeat(4, minmax(0, 1fr));
  gap: 12px;
  margin: 24px 0 30px;
}

.pfm-champ-qb-card {
  padding: 17px 15px;
  border: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  border-radius: 14px;
  background: var(--pfm-soft);
  text-align: center;
}

.pfm-champ-qb-card span {
  display: block;
  color: var(--pfm-muted);
  font-size: 11px;
  font-weight: 900;
  letter-spacing: .06em;
  text-transform: uppercase;
}

.pfm-champ-qb-card strong {
  display: block;
  margin: 5px 0 3px;
  color: var(--pfm-red);
  font-size: 30px;
  line-height: 1;
  font-weight: 950;
  letter-spacing: -.04em;
}

.pfm-champ-qb-card small {
  display: block;
  color: var(--pfm-navy);
  font-size: 12px;
  line-height: 1.35;
  font-weight: 800;
}

.pfm-champ-steps {
  margin: 24px 0 0;
  padding: 0;
  list-style: none;
}

.pfm-champ-steps li {
  position: relative;
  margin: 0 0 13px;
  padding: 16px 17px 16px 52px;
  border: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  border-radius: 13px;
  background: #fff;
  color: var(--pfm-copy);
  font-size: 16px;
  line-height: 1.58;
}

.pfm-champ-steps li::before {
  content: attr(data-step);
  position: absolute;
  top: 16px;
  left: 16px;
  display: grid;
  width: 25px;
  height: 25px;
  place-items: center;
  border-radius: 50%;
  background: var(--pfm-red);
  color: #fff;
  font-size: 12px;
  line-height: 1;
  font-weight: 950;
}

.pfm-champ-steps strong {
  color: var(--pfm-navy);
}


.pfm-champ-sources {
  margin: 38px 0 0;
  border-top: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  padding-top: 24px;
}

.pfm-champ-sources details {
  margin: 0;
  padding: 16px 18px;
  border: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  border-radius: 12px;
  background: var(--pfm-soft);
}

.pfm-champ-sources summary {
  cursor: pointer;
  color: var(--pfm-navy);
  font-size: 14px;
  line-height: 1.45;
  font-weight: 900;
}

.pfm-champ-sources ul {
  margin: 15px 0 0;
  padding-left: 20px;
}

.pfm-champ-sources li {
  margin: 7px 0;
  color: var(--pfm-copy);
  font-size: 14px;
  line-height: 1.55;
}

@media (max-width: 800px) {
.pfm-champ-qb-grid {
    grid-template-columns: repeat(2, minmax(0, 1fr));
  }
}

@media (max-width: 600px) {
  .pfm-champ-research p,
  .pfm-champ-research li {
    font-size: 16px;
  }

  .pfm-champ-qb-grid {
    grid-template-columns: 1fr;
  }

  .pfm-champ-big-number {
    grid-template-columns: 1fr;
    gap: 10px;
  }

  .pfm-champ-big-number strong {
    font-size: 54px;
  }

  .pfm-champ-bar-row {
    grid-template-columns: 96px minmax(0, 1fr) 52px;
    gap: 8px;
  }

  .pfm-champ-note,
  .pfm-champ-callout,
  .pfm-champ-final,
  .pfm-champ-chart {
    padding: 17px;
  }

  .pfm-champ-section {
    padding: 32px 0 35px;
  }
}

@media (max-width: 360px) {
  .pfm-champ-bar-row {
    grid-template-columns: 1fr 48px;
  }

  .pfm-champ-bar-label {
    grid-column: 1 / -1;
  }

  .pfm-champ-bar-track {
    grid-column: 1;
  }

  .pfm-champ-bar-value {
    grid-column: 2;
  }

  .pfm-champ-steps li {
    padding-left: 48px;
  }
}
</style>

<article class="pfm-champ-research">
  <span class="pfm-champ-kicker">PFM Fantasy Research</span>

  <p class="pfm-champ-lede">Every August we argue about Zero RB, Hero RB, when to draft a quarterback, whether tight end is worth paying for and which late picks can win a league. Most of that starts with projections. This time we went backward.</p>

  <p>PFM pulled five years of championship roster data and lined it up with preseason ADP. The goal was pretty simple: stop guessing about what a league-winning roster is supposed to look like and see which players actually kept showing up on winning teams.</p>

  <p>The answer is not one clear fantasy football draft strategy. In fact, the data pushes back pretty hard on the idea that there is one. What did show up were a few patterns that kept repeating, including one strange hole in the middle of drafts that jumped off the page.</p>

  <div class="pfm-champ-note">
    <p><strong>How This Study Works:</strong> The core study uses four complete ESPN seasons: the 50 players most commonly found on championship rosters in 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025. That gives us 200 player-seasons from one consistent source. FantasyPros&#8217; 2021 review gives us a fifth season to extend the trends, but it is a smaller dataset from a different platform, so its percentages are not mixed directly into ESPN&#8217;s four-year sample. FantasyPros&#8217; 2025 My Playbook results are used separately as a check on actual championship rates.</p>
    <p>One important warning: a player being on 20% of championship rosters does <strong>not</strong> mean 20% of teams with that player won a title. We keep those numbers separate instead of mixing them together.</p>
  </div>

  <section class="pfm-champ-section">
    <h2>The Weirdest Number Is Sitting in the Middle of the Draft</h2>

    <p>The number below really caught my eye. Take the 10 players who appeared on the highest percentage of ESPN championship rosters in each season from 2022 through 2025. That gives us 40 player-seasons.</p>

    <div class="pfm-champ-big-number">
      <strong>1</strong>
      <p>Only one of those 40 players had an ADP between picks 61 and 100. It was Jalen Hurts at 63.4 in 2022.</p>
    </div>

    <p>Everyone else came from the first 60 picks, after pick 100 or went undrafted. Since 2023, there has not been a single player with an ADP from 61 through 100 among ESPN&#8217;s 10 most common championship players.</p>

    <p>The year-to-year split makes it even more interesting. In 2022, nine of the top 10 were drafted inside the first 60 picks and Hurts was the only exception at 63.4. From 2023 through 2025, 10 of the 30 top-10 championship players were drafted after pick 100 or went undrafted. The middle produced zero.</p>

    <div class="pfm-champ-chart" role="img" aria-label="ADP ranges for the top 10 ESPN championship-roster players from 2022 through 2025. Picks 1 to 24 account for 42.5 percent, picks 25 to 60 for 30 percent, picks 61 to 100 for 2.5 percent, picks 101 or later for 17.5 percent, and undrafted players for 7.5 percent.">
      <p class="pfm-champ-chart-title">Where the Top 10 Championship Players Were Drafted, 2022-2025</p>
      <p class="pfm-champ-chart-sub">40 player-seasons, grouped by ESPN preseason ADP.</p>

      <div class="pfm-champ-bar-row">
        <span class="pfm-champ-bar-label">Picks 1-24</span>
        <div class="pfm-champ-bar-track"><div class="pfm-champ-bar-fill" style="width:42.5%"></div></div>
        <span class="pfm-champ-bar-value">17 / 40</span>
      </div>
      <div class="pfm-champ-bar-row">
        <span class="pfm-champ-bar-label">Picks 25-60</span>
        <div class="pfm-champ-bar-track"><div class="pfm-champ-bar-fill" style="width:30%"></div></div>
        <span class="pfm-champ-bar-value">12 / 40</span>
      </div>
      <div class="pfm-champ-bar-row is-mid">
        <span class="pfm-champ-bar-label">Picks 61-100</span>
        <div class="pfm-champ-bar-track"><div class="pfm-champ-bar-fill" style="width:2.5%"></div></div>
        <span class="pfm-champ-bar-value">1 / 40</span>
      </div>
      <div class="pfm-champ-bar-row">
        <span class="pfm-champ-bar-label">Pick 101+</span>
        <div class="pfm-champ-bar-track"><div class="pfm-champ-bar-fill" style="width:17.5%"></div></div>
        <span class="pfm-champ-bar-value">7 / 40</span>
      </div>
      <div class="pfm-champ-bar-row">
        <span class="pfm-champ-bar-label">Undrafted</span>
        <div class="pfm-champ-bar-track"><div class="pfm-champ-bar-fill" style="width:7.5%"></div></div>
        <span class="pfm-champ-bar-value">3 / 40</span>
      </div>
    </div>

    <p>Expanding the sample size does not make that last point disappear. From 2023 through 2025, only three of the 60 players who finished inside the top 20 in championship-roster share had an ADP from 61 to 100. Thirty-one came from the top 60. Another 26 came after pick 100 or went undrafted.</p>

    <p>That leaves 57 of those 60 players, or 95%, coming from either the first 60 picks or the pick-101-plus/undrafted group. A normal draft board is not split that way. The championship list however has been.</p>

    <p>There is probably some roster churn baked into this too. Early picks tend to stick because managers paid for them. Late breakouts get added by active teams. A seventh-round pick who turns into nothing more than a bench option is much easier to cut. That does not explain why a gap is this large but it is a good reason not to pretend Rounds 6 through 9 themselves are cursed.</p>

    <p>What it does tell us is that those picks are a bad place to settle for a player whose best case is simply being usable. A sixth-round pick still costs enough that a low-upside season can hurt. The goal should be to find someone who can move into a much higher tier than the one he was drafted in.</p>
  </section>

  <section class="pfm-champ-section">
    <h2>First Lesson: There Is No One Way to Build a League-Winning Roster</h2>

    <p>Let&#8217;s start with the five players who appeared on the most championship rosters each year. In 2021, the group was four wide receivers and a tight end. A year later it was two running backs, a quarterback, a tight end and a wide receiver. The next three seasons mixed the positions again.</p>

    <p>That alone makes it hard to sell one draft strategy as the answer. A league can be won behind a first-round running back, an elite wide receiver, a cheap quarterback or a rookie tight end. The position changes. The common thread is that somebody on the roster gave back a lot more than the price paid for him.</p>

    <div class="pfm-champ-table-wrap" role="region" aria-label="Most common championship roster player by season" tabindex="0">
      <table class="pfm-champ-table">
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th scope="col">Season</th>
            <th scope="col">Championship-Roster Leader</th>
            <th scope="col">Share</th>
            <th scope="col">Preseason ADP</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr><td>2021</td><td>Amon-Ra St. Brown, WR</td><td>23%</td><td>About 211</td></tr>
          <tr><td>2022</td><td>Christian McCaffrey, RB</td><td>22.8%</td><td>3.1</td></tr>
          <tr><td>2023</td><td>CeeDee Lamb, WR</td><td>30.6%</td><td>16.6</td></tr>
          <tr><td>2024</td><td>Jahmyr Gibbs, RB</td><td>29.0%</td><td>16.0</td></tr>
          <tr><td>2025</td><td>Puka Nacua, WR</td><td>29.1%</td><td>11.6</td></tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </div>

    <p>Four of those five players were drafted inside the top 17. Late-round league winners are more fun to talk about, yet the No. 1 championship player has usually been somebody managers paid for.</p>

    <p>That&#8217;s easy to lose sight of once sleeper season takes over August. The draft is not just about finding the one player everybody missed. Hitting on an expensive pick still gives a roster a huge head start.</p>
</section>

  <section class="pfm-champ-section">
    <h2>Waiting on Quarterback Has Become a Real Championship Trend</h2>

    <p>There is always a point in a draft where the quarterback run starts and it feels like everyone else knows something. The last three championship seasons are a good reason not to panic.</p>

    <p>We took the three quarterbacks with the highest championship-roster shares in each ESPN season. The median ADP of that group has moved from 31.6 in 2022 to 98.5 in 2023, 109.7 in 2024 and 125.1 in 2025.</p>

    <div class="pfm-champ-qb-grid" aria-label="Median preseason ADP of the three quarterbacks with the highest championship roster shares by season">
      <div class="pfm-champ-qb-card"><span>2022</span><strong>31.6 (ADP)</strong><small>Mahomes led the group</small></div>
      <div class="pfm-champ-qb-card"><span>2023</span><strong>98.5 (ADP)</strong><small>Stroud and Dak joined Allen</small></div>
      <div class="pfm-champ-qb-card"><span>2024</span><strong>109.7 (ADP)</strong><small>Daniels and Baker joined Lamar</small></div>
      <div class="pfm-champ-qb-card"><span>2025</span><strong>125.1 (ADP)</strong><small>Maye and Stafford joined Allen</small></div>
    </div>

    <p>Look at the names. C.J. Stroud had an ADP of 169.0 in 2023. Jayden Daniels was 109.7 and Baker Mayfield 164.2 in 2024. Drake Maye was 125.1 and Matthew Stafford 159.9 in 2025.</p>

    <p>That does not kill the case for picking an elite quarterback. Patrick Mahomes was the No. 2 championship-roster player in 2022, Josh Allen made the top 10 in 2023 and Lamar Jackson was No. 3 overall in 2024. The point is that the penalty for waiting has gotten smaller because late quarterbacks keep turning into real difference-makers.</p>

    <p>FantasyPros&#8217; 2025 My Playbook data makes the same point from a different angle. Brock Purdy teams won championships at a 14.27% rate and Drake Maye teams at 12.72%. Josh Allen helped plenty of teams reach the playoffs but his teams won titles just 7.21% of the time after a disappointing fantasy postseason.</p>

    <p>I&#8217;ve waited on quarterback for years and this is another reason I don&#8217;t see much reason to stop. That does not mean passing on an elite option if the price is right. If anything, don&#8217;t chase the position just because the room starts taking quarterbacks.</p>
</section>

  <section class="pfm-champ-section">
    <h2>The Waiver Wire Matters but It Does Not Replace the Draft</h2>

    <p>There are seasons where the waiver wire really does decide titles. 2023 was the best example in this sample. ESPN found that five of its top 13 championship-roster players were effectively undrafted: Kyren Williams, Puka Nacua, Brandon Aubrey, Zamir White and Trey McBride.</p>

    <p>That is an absurd amount of title-winning production that was available after draft day. White takes it even further. He was rostered in only 0.5% of ESPN leagues entering Week 15, then took over for an injured Josh Jacobs and finished on 16.6% of championship rosters.</p>

    <p>Then 2024 gave us another version. Bucky Irving went at ADP 167.5 and finished fourth in championship-roster share. Jonnu Smith was undrafted and finished 14th. Michael Carter was rostered in fewer than 2% of ESPN leagues on New Year&#8217;s Day, then ended up on 13.4% of champions after injuries opened the Arizona backfield.</p>

    <p>Michael Wilson did it late in 2025. He went undrafted, then scored 86.7 fantasy points from Weeks 14 through 17 as his role grew. He finished ninth in ESPN championship-roster share at 17.4%.</p>

    <p>2022 keeps the waiver point in check. The top five championship players were Christian McCaffrey, Patrick Mahomes, Austin Ekeler, Travis Kelce and A.J. Brown. Every one of them had an ADP of 36 or better. The first undrafted player on that list was Jerick McKinnon at No. 19.</p>

    <p>So yes, leagues can be won on waivers. They just aren&#8217;t always. Waivers give you another chance to find the value your draft missed. Some years that chance is massive. Other years the teams with healthy stars simply keep rolling.</p>

    <div class="pfm-champ-callout">
      <p><strong>The Useful Takeaway:</strong> Don&#8217;t treat the waiver wire as an emergency room. Treat it as another draft that happens every week. The players who can inherit a real role are worth more than the safe bench player who is never cracking your lineup.</p>
    </div>
  </section>

  <section class="pfm-champ-section">
    <h2>Championship Data Is Really Telling Us Two Stories at Once</h2>

    <p>Championship-roster share rewards two different things. A player can dominate for four months or he can catch fire right when the fantasy playoffs start. Sometimes the late pickup who barely mattered in October ends up deciding December.</p>

    <p>Amon-Ra St. Brown is the clearest 2021 example. He entered Week 13 as the WR62, then finished as the top-scoring wide receiver over the standard Weeks 15-17 playoff stretch. FantasyPros found him on 23% of championship rosters.</p>

    <p>CeeDee Lamb&#8217;s 2023 run was different because he was already a star. Then he scored 119.5 PPR points from Weeks 15 through 18 and at least 35 in each of the final two weeks. His 30.6% championship-roster share is the highest single-season mark in our 2022-2025 ESPN sample.</p>

    <p>Jahmyr Gibbs followed with 126.1 points across the four 2024 fantasy playoff weeks. He was the only player to score at least 25 in all four and finished on 29% of ESPN champions. His role also grew after David Montgomery suffered an MCL sprain in Week 15.</p>

    <p>Then came 2025. Puka Nacua dropped 46.5 in Week 16. Bijan Robinson scored at least 29 in each of the final three fantasy playoff weeks. Both finished near the top of the championship list.</p>

    <p>Trevor Lawrence is the counterexample. He was the No. 2 overall fantasy scorer across the four playoff weeks, yet he appeared on only 10.7% of ESPN championship rosters. In one-quarterback leagues he simply was not being started enough for all those points to matter.</p>

    <p>That&#8217;s the catch. A league winner is not just a player who scores a lot. He has to be on your roster, in your lineup and producing at the exact time the season is being decided.</p>
  </section>

  <section class="pfm-champ-section">
    <h2>Amon-Ra St. Brown Is the Five-Year Outlier</h2>

    <p>One player kept showing up no matter what the rest of the season looked like.</p>

    <p>Amon-Ra was No. 18 on ESPN&#8217;s championship-roster list in 2022, No. 2 in 2023, No. 8 in 2024 and No. 17 in 2025. Josh Allen and Mike Evans also made the top 50 in all four seasons but Amon-Ra is the only player who stayed inside the top 20 every year.</p>

    <p>Go back one more year and it gets better. FantasyPros had him No. 1 on championship rosters in 2021 at 23% after he entered the season around pick 211.</p>

    <p>The price obviously changed. By 2025 his ESPN ADP was 11.3. The result did not. He kept giving fantasy teams a combination of weekly volume, availability and enough big games to stay alive deep into December.</p>

    <p>That is a useful reminder when a reliable player starts to feel boring in August. Upside matters but a player who repeatedly earns elite volume in a good offense can be a league-winning piece even after the discount disappears.</p>
  </section>

  <section class="pfm-champ-section">
    <h2>Good Offenses Keep Producing League Winners</h2>

    <p>Some offenses kept putting multiple players onto these lists. Across the 200 ESPN player-seasons from 2022 through 2025, Cincinnati and Detroit each produced 11 top-50 appearances at quarterback, running back, wide receiver or tight end. Dallas, Arizona, Tampa Bay and San Francisco were next with nine.</p>

    <p>The best examples came in bunches. Dallas put CeeDee Lamb, Brandon Aubrey, its defense and Dak Prescott inside the top 20 in 2023. Tampa Bay had Bucky Irving, Mike Evans and Baker Mayfield there in 2024. Detroit had Amon-Ra St. Brown, Sam LaPorta and Jahmyr Gibbs in 2023.</p>

    <p>That is not evidence that forcing a stack wins leagues. It is a reminder that a good NFL offense can support more than one fantasy value at the same time. There is a difference between forcing a stack and breaking a close call toward a player in an offense you trust.</p>
  </section>

  <section class="pfm-champ-section">
    <h2>What the Championship Percentages Do Not Prove</h2>

    <p>This is the part where it is easy to get carried away.</p>

    <p>ESPN&#8217;s championship-roster percentages tell us which players were common among winners. They do not tell us that drafting a certain position in Round 1 caused those teams to win. They also cannot tell us whether Zero RB beat Hero RB, whether stacking increased title odds or which draft slot was best.</p>

    <p>To answer those questions properly, we would need complete draft and transaction histories for both champions and non-champions across a large representative sample. Anything less turns an interesting pattern into a claim the data cannot actually support.</p>

    <p>FantasyPros&#8217; My Playbook data shows why the denominator matters. ESPN had Josh Allen on 16.3% of championship rosters in 2025. FantasyPros, asking a different question, found that teams with Allen won their leagues 7.21% of the time. Both can be true because the first number starts with champions and the second starts with Allen teams.</p>

    <p>So the findings worth trusting most are the ones we can actually see repeating: where the most common championship players were drafted, how quarterback cost changed, which players kept returning and how often late role changes mattered.</p>
  </section>

  <section class="pfm-champ-section">
    <h2>What Five Years of League Winners Tell Us About the 2026 Draft</h2>

    <p>Five years of winners do not hand us a perfect draft strategy. They do however make a few mistakes much easier to avoid.</p>

    <ol class="pfm-champ-steps">
      <li data-step="1"><strong>Do not get cute with the first two rounds.</strong> Four of the last five championship-roster leaders were top-17 picks. A premium player who hits can still be the biggest edge in the league.</li>
      <li data-step="2"><strong>Use the middle rounds to chase a tier jump.</strong> The almost complete absence of ADP 61-100 players from the very top of the championship lists is hard to ignore. Floor is useful but those picks still need real upside.</li>
      <li data-step="3"><strong>Do not panic during the quarterback run.</strong> The median ADP of the top three championship QBs has pushed past pick 100 in each of the last two seasons. Waiting is not only smart, its becoming the norm.</li>
      <li data-step="4"><strong>Keep taking swings after the draft.</strong> Kyren Williams, Puka Nacua, Trey McBride, Michael Carter and Michael Wilson all became title pieces after their prices had already disappeared. Roles change too fast to stop looking.</li>
      <li data-step="5"><strong>Draft for December upside, then manage for what actually happens.</strong> No August ranking can predict every injury or late-season role change. The best rosters leave enough flexibility to act when those openings show up.</li>
    </ol>

    <p>There is one more thing worth saying about the first round. It does not have to be perfect. ESPN&#8217;s 2024 data had six of the 10 first-round ADP players inside the top 24 in championship-roster share but Breece Hall, CeeDee Lamb, Tyreek Hill and Christian McCaffrey all finished 60th or worse. In 2025 FantasyPros still found teams that won with Justin Jefferson and Saquon Barkley despite championship rates of only 3.54% and 4.66%.</p>

    <p>A bad early pick makes the season tougher. It does not end it. Hit where you can, keep chasing players whose value can change and stay active on the waiver wire when the NFL gives you another chance.</p>

    <div class="pfm-champ-final">
      <p><strong>For 2026:</strong> PFM&#8217;s <a href="https://profootballmania.com/fantasy-football-rankings/">fantasy football rankings</a> are built for that approach. The rankings matter but price matters too. The goal is not to win an argument about draft strategy in August. It is to keep finding players who can give back more than they cost.</p>
    </div>
  </section>

  <section class="pfm-champ-sources">
    <details>
      <summary>Research Methodology and Sources</summary>
      <ul>
        <li><strong>Core 2022-2025 dataset:</strong> 200 player-seasons from ESPN&#8217;s annual top-50 lists of players most commonly found on championship rosters. PFM grouped those players by preseason ADP, position and team, then calculated the cross-year findings used above.</li>
        <li><strong>2021 extension:</strong> FantasyPros&#8217; season review supplies the five most common championship-roster players, including Amon-Ra St. Brown at 23%, Cooper Kupp at 22% and Mark Andrews at 20%. Because this comes from a different platform, PFM does not directly merge the 2021 percentages into ESPN&#8217;s later rates.</li>
        <li><strong>2025 conditional-rate cross-check:</strong> FantasyPros My Playbook reports how often teams rostering a specific player won a championship. That is a different denominator from ESPN&#8217;s share-of-champions metric and is used only where labeled.</li>
        <li><strong>Scoring:</strong> ESPN&#8217;s historical championship tables use PPR scoring. The findings here are about championship-roster patterns and draft cost, not a claim that the exact player order transfers unchanged to half-PPR.</li>
      </ul>

      <ul>
        <li><a href="https://www.fantasypros.com/2022/01/2021-season-in-review-players-on-the-most-playoff-and-championship-rosters/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">FantasyPros: 2021 Season in Review, Championship Rosters</a></li>
        <li><a href="https://www.espn.com/fantasy/football/story/_/id/35412511/christian-mccaffrey-patrick-mahomes-austin-ekeler-travis-kelce" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">ESPN: 2022 Most Common Players on Championship Teams</a></li>
        <li><a href="https://www.espn.com/fantasy/football/story/_/id/39266644/2023-fantasy-football-championship-most-common-player" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">ESPN: 2023 Most Common Players on Championship Teams</a></li>
        <li><a href="https://www.espn.com/fantasy/football/story/_/id/43260187/fantasy-football-2024-most-common-players-championship-rosters" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">ESPN: 2024 Most Common Players on Championship Teams</a></li>
        <li><a href="https://www.espn.com/fantasy/football/story/_/id/47454522/2025-fantasy-football-champions-most-common-players" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">ESPN: 2025 Most Common Players on Championship Teams</a></li>
        <li><a href="https://www.fantasypros.com/2026/01/most-rostered-championship-playoff-players-fantasy-football/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">FantasyPros: 2025 My Playbook Championship and Playoff Rates</a></li>
      </ul>
    </details>
  </section>
</article>
<p>The post <a href="https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/17/fantasy-football-draft-strategy-championship-data/">What Actually Wins Fantasy Football Leagues? 5 Years of Championship Data</a> appeared first on <a href="https://profootballmania.com">Pro Football Mania</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/17/fantasy-football-draft-strategy-championship-data/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">54518</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 Running Backs I’m Drafting Above ADP in 2026 Fantasy Football</title>
		<link>https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/15/2026-fantasy-football-running-backs-above-adp/</link>
					<comments>https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/15/2026-fantasy-football-running-backs-above-adp/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin Fuhr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 18:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Fantasy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://profootballmania.com/?p=54497</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Jadarian Price and Jonathon Brooks are two of five running backs I have ranked ahead of their current half-PPR ADP. Here are the five backs I’m willing to draft a little earlier than everyone else.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/15/2026-fantasy-football-running-backs-above-adp/">5 Running Backs I’m Drafting Above ADP in 2026 Fantasy Football</a> appeared first on <a href="https://profootballmania.com">Pro Football Mania</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<style>
.pfm-rb-values,
.pfm-rb-values * {
  box-sizing: border-box;
}

.pfm-rb-values {
  --pfm-navy: #0f2742;
  --pfm-red: #8b0f1a;
  --pfm-red-dark: #6f0c15;
  --pfm-gold: #d6a313;
  --pfm-ink: #172033;
  --pfm-copy: #354056;
  --pfm-muted: #64748b;
  --pfm-border: #dfe4ec;
  --pfm-soft: #f8fafc;
  color: var(--pfm-ink);
  font-family: Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", Arial, sans-serif;
}

.pfm-rb-values p,
.pfm-rb-values li {
  font-size: 17px;
  line-height: 1.68;
}

.pfm-rb-values p {
  margin: 0 0 1.15em;
  color: var(--pfm-copy);
}

.pfm-rb-values a {
  color: var(--pfm-red);
  font-weight: 800;
  text-decoration-thickness: 2px;
  text-underline-offset: 3px;
}

.pfm-rb-values a:hover,
.pfm-rb-values a:focus {
  color: var(--pfm-red-dark);
}

.pfm-rb-values a:focus-visible {
  outline: 3px solid rgba(214, 163, 19, .65);
  outline-offset: 3px;
}

.pfm-rb-kicker {
  display: inline-block;
  margin: 4px 0 12px;
  color: var(--pfm-red);
  font-size: 12px;
  line-height: 1.3;
  font-weight: 950;
  letter-spacing: .1em;
  text-transform: uppercase;
}

.pfm-rb-lede {
  margin: 0 0 1.15em !important;
  color: var(--pfm-navy) !important;
  font-size: clamp(20px, 2.5vw, 24px) !important;
  line-height: 1.55 !important;
  font-weight: 800 !important;
}

.pfm-rb-rank-note {
  margin: 26px 0 34px;
  padding: 18px 20px;
  border: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  border-left: 5px solid var(--pfm-red);
  border-radius: 12px;
  background: #fff;
  box-shadow: 0 8px 22px rgba(15, 23, 42, .05);
}

.pfm-rb-rank-note p {
  margin: 0 !important;
  color: var(--pfm-copy) !important;
  font-size: 15px !important;
  line-height: 1.6 !important;
}

.pfm-rb-rank-note strong {
  color: var(--pfm-navy);
}

.pfm-rb-player {
  margin: 0;
  padding: 34px 0 38px;
  border-top: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
}

.pfm-rb-player:first-of-type {
  padding-top: 6px;
  border-top: 0;
}

.pfm-rb-team-tag {
  display: inline-flex;
  max-width: 100%;
  align-items: center;
  gap: 9px;
  margin: 0 0 10px;
  color: var(--pfm-muted);
  font-size: 12px;
  line-height: 1.25;
  font-weight: 900;
  letter-spacing: .07em;
  text-transform: uppercase;
}

.pfm-rb-team-tag img {
  display: block !important;
  width: 30px !important;
  height: 30px !important;
  max-width: 30px !important;
  object-fit: contain !important;
  flex: 0 0 30px;
}

.pfm-rb-player h2 {
  margin: 0 0 11px !important;
  color: var(--pfm-navy) !important;
  font-size: clamp(27px, 3.5vw, 35px) !important;
  line-height: 1.12 !important;
  font-weight: 950 !important;
  letter-spacing: -.03em !important;
  text-transform: none !important;
}

.pfm-rb-rankline {
  display: flex;
  flex-wrap: wrap;
  gap: 7px 12px;
  align-items: center;
  margin: 0 0 20px !important;
  color: var(--pfm-navy) !important;
  font-size: 13px !important;
  line-height: 1.45 !important;
  font-weight: 900 !important;
}

.pfm-rb-rankline span {
  display: inline-flex;
  align-items: center;
  gap: 5px;
}

.pfm-rb-rankline span + span::before {
  content: "•";
  margin-right: 7px;
  color: var(--pfm-red);
}

.pfm-rb-rankline strong {
  color: var(--pfm-red);
  font-weight: 950;
}

.pfm-rb-values a.pfm-rb-cta,
.pfm-rb-values a.pfm-rb-cta:link,
.pfm-rb-values a.pfm-rb-cta:visited {
  display: inline-flex !important;
  width: auto !important;
  max-width: 100% !important;
  min-height: 44px !important;
  align-items: center !important;
  justify-content: center !important;
  margin: 5px 0 0 !important;
  padding: 10px 16px !important;
  border: 1px solid var(--pfm-red) !important;
  border-radius: 10px !important;
  background: var(--pfm-red) !important;
  color: #fff !important;
  -webkit-text-fill-color: #fff !important;
  font-family: Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", Arial, sans-serif !important;
  font-size: 14px !important;
  line-height: 1.2 !important;
  font-weight: 850 !important;
  letter-spacing: 0 !important;
  text-align: center !important;
  text-decoration: none !important;
  text-transform: none !important;
  box-shadow: none !important;
}

.pfm-rb-values a.pfm-rb-cta:hover,
.pfm-rb-values a.pfm-rb-cta:focus {
  border-color: var(--pfm-red-dark) !important;
  background: var(--pfm-red-dark) !important;
  color: #fff !important;
  -webkit-text-fill-color: #fff !important;
  text-decoration: none !important;
}

.pfm-rb-values a.pfm-rb-cta:focus-visible {
  outline: 3px solid rgba(214, 163, 19, .65) !important;
  outline-offset: 3px !important;
}

.pfm-rb-closing {
  margin: 4px 0 28px;
  padding: 22px 24px;
  border: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  border-left: 5px solid var(--pfm-red);
  border-radius: 12px;
  background: #fff;
  box-shadow: 0 8px 22px rgba(15, 23, 42, .05);
}

.pfm-rb-closing > :last-child {
  margin-bottom: 0;
}

.pfm-rb-freshness {
  margin-top: 24px !important;
  color: var(--pfm-muted) !important;
  font-size: 13px !important;
  line-height: 1.55 !important;
}

.pfm-rb-source-review {
  margin-top: 18px;
  border-top: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  padding-top: 16px;
}

.pfm-rb-source-review summary {
  color: var(--pfm-navy);
  font-size: 14px;
  line-height: 1.4;
  font-weight: 900;
  cursor: pointer;
}

.pfm-rb-source-review div {
  padding-top: 12px;
}

.pfm-rb-source-review p,
.pfm-rb-source-review li {
  font-size: 14px !important;
  line-height: 1.58 !important;
}

.pfm-rb-source-review ul {
  margin: 0;
  padding-left: 21px;
}

.pfm-rb-source-review li {
  margin-bottom: 7px;
}

@media (max-width: 700px) {
  .pfm-rb-values p,
  .pfm-rb-values li {
    font-size: 16px;
  }

  .pfm-rb-player {
    padding: 29px 0 32px;
  }

  .pfm-rb-player h2 {
    font-size: 27px !important;
  }

  .pfm-rb-rank-note,
  .pfm-rb-closing {
    padding: 18px;
  }

  .pfm-rb-rankline {
    gap: 5px 10px;
  }

  .pfm-rb-values a.pfm-rb-cta {
    width: 100% !important;
  }
}

@media (max-width: 380px) {
  .pfm-rb-player h2 {
    font-size: 25px !important;
  }

  .pfm-rb-rankline {
    display: block;
  }

  .pfm-rb-rankline span {
    display: flex;
    margin-bottom: 4px;
  }

  .pfm-rb-rankline span + span::before {
    content: none;
  }
}

@media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) {
  .pfm-rb-values * {
    scroll-behavior: auto !important;
    transition: none !important;
    animation: none !important;
  }
}
</style>

<article class="pfm-rb-values">
  <span class="pfm-rb-kicker">PFM Fantasy Football</span>

  <p class="pfm-rb-lede">
    I went back through my half-PPR rankings and started looking at the running backs I have higher than their current ADP. A few names jumped out right away. Jadarian Price and Jonathon Brooks are two of my favorites but there are three more backs I keep coming back to at their current price.
  </p>

  <p>
    I&#8217;m not calling all five sleepers and I&#8217;m definitely not drafting them at any cost. These are just five spots where I look at the ADP, look at my ranking and would rather take the chance a little earlier.
  </p>

  <p>
    You can see the full order in our <a href="/fantasy-football-rankings/">2026 fantasy football rankings</a>.
  </p>

  <div class="pfm-rb-rank-note">
    <p>
      <strong>How I&#8217;m looking at the price:</strong> PFM rank is where I currently have the player in half-PPR. ADP is where he is going in current 12-team, one-QB half-PPR drafts. Both are going to move as we get closer to Week 1.
    </p>
  </div>

  <section class="pfm-rb-player" aria-labelledby="pfm-rb-price">
    <div class="pfm-rb-team-tag">
      <img loading="lazy" src="/images/teams/sea.png" alt="" width="30" height="30" loading="lazy" decoding="async">
      <span>Seattle Seahawks</span>
    </div>
    <h2 id="pfm-rb-price">1. Jadarian Price Could Get This Backfield Early</h2>
    <p class="pfm-rb-rankline">
      <span><strong>PFM:</strong> RB25</span>
      <span>No. 63 overall</span>
      <span>ADP 72.0</span>
    </p>

    <p>
      Price is already up to RB25 for me and I still think there is room to move him higher if this Seattle backfield stays this open. Kenneth Walker is gone, Zach Charbonnet is still working his way back from a torn ACL with no firm return date and the Seahawks spent a first-round pick on Price. He should get a real chance to show pretty quickly whether he can handle the lead job.
    </p>

    <p>
      The one thing holding me back a little is the receiving work. Price caught only 11 passes in 41 games at Notre Dame, so I&#8217;m not going to suddenly assume he is going to catch 50 passes because Seattle wants to use him more in that part of the offense. If he can just do enough there to stay on the field, that would be plenty for me.
    </p>

    <p>
      Charbonnet is going to matter once he gets back. Until then, Price has a real chance to grab this job and make RB25 look cheap.
    </p>
  </section>

  <section class="pfm-rb-player" aria-labelledby="pfm-rb-brooks">
    <div class="pfm-rb-team-tag">
      <img loading="lazy" src="/images/teams/car.png" alt="" width="30" height="30" loading="lazy" decoding="async">
      <span>Carolina Panthers</span>
    </div>
    <h2 id="pfm-rb-brooks">2. Jonathon Brooks Is Getting Harder to Ignore</h2>
    <p class="pfm-rb-rankline">
      <span><strong>PFM:</strong> RB35</span>
      <span>No. 98 overall</span>
      <span>ADP 111.3</span>
    </p>

    <p>
     Brooks will keep rising in ADP as I expect more and more hype to build. He has worked with the first-team offense throughout camp and Dave Canales was already planning to mix him in with Chuba Hubbard before Hubbard went down with a hamstring injury. With Hubbard now week-to-week, Brooks should get plenty of chances to make this backfield more interesting.
    </p>

    <p>
      Hubbard isn&#8217;t just going away and I&#8217;m not expecting Brooks to walk in and take every carry. We did watch Rico Dowdle take advantage when Hubbard was injured last year and then keep a major role after Hubbard returned though. If Brooks plays well, I don&#8217;t think Canales is going to keep him on the sideline just because Hubbard entered camp as the starter.
    </p>

    <p>
      Brooks was the first running back drafted in 2024 for a reason and we have barely gotten to see that player in the NFL. If that version of Brooks finally shows up in Carolina, RB35 is going to be too low.
    </p>
  </section>

  <section class="pfm-rb-player" aria-labelledby="pfm-rb-tracy">
    <div class="pfm-rb-team-tag">
      <img loading="lazy" src="/images/teams/nyg.png" alt="" width="30" height="30" loading="lazy" decoding="async">
      <span>New York Giants</span>
    </div>
    <h2 id="pfm-rb-tracy">3. Tyrone Tracy Jr. Has Fallen Too Far</h2>
    <p class="pfm-rb-rankline">
      <span><strong>PFM:</strong> RB40</span>
      <span>No. 118 overall</span>
      <span>ADP 155.5</span>
    </p>

    <p>
      Tracy might be the easiest bet on this list for me. I have him No. 118 overall and he is currently going around pick 155. That feels like a pretty big drop for a player who has already gone over 1,000 scrimmage yards in each of his first two NFL seasons.
    </p>

    <p>
      Cam Skattebo is going to get his touches and he deserves them. I just think Tracy has fallen too far because everyone wants a clear answer on who owns the Giants backfield. I don&#8217;t need Tracy to own it at this price.
    </p>

    <p>
      Give him a real share of the carries and enough receiving work to stay involved every week and I can live with the timeshare. Once we are talking about a proven NFL back going this late, I&#8217;m willing to take that shot all day.
    </p>
  </section>

  <section class="pfm-rb-player" aria-labelledby="pfm-rb-corum">
    <div class="pfm-rb-team-tag">
      <img loading="lazy" src="/images/teams/lar.png" alt="" width="30" height="30" loading="lazy" decoding="async">
      <span>Los Angeles Rams</span>
    </div>
    <h2 id="pfm-rb-corum">4. Blake Corum Is More Than a Handcuff</h2>
    <p class="pfm-rb-rankline">
      <span><strong>PFM:</strong> RB36</span>
      <span>No. 99 overall</span>
      <span>ADP 120.8</span>
    </p>

    <p>
      I think Corum is getting treated a little too much like he is only a Kyren Williams handcuff. He ran for a career-high 746 yards with six touchdowns last season and the Rams keep talking about how much leaner and more explosive he looks in camp. We already know he can handle NFL carries, so I&#8217;m more interested in whether he can force his way into a little more work.
    </p>

    <p>
      Williams is still the lead back and that&#8217;s what can sink his value. If he stays healthy and keeps getting most of the touches, Corum can absolutely finish below where I have him.
    </p>

    <p>
      I have Corum inside my top 100 overall and he is still going around pick 121. At that point in the draft, I&#8217;m willing to bet on him getting more work without needing a Williams injury to make the pick worth it.
    </p>
  </section>

  <section class="pfm-rb-player" aria-labelledby="pfm-rb-white">
    <div class="pfm-rb-team-tag">
      <img loading="lazy" src="/images/teams/was.png" alt="" width="30" height="30" loading="lazy" decoding="async">
      <span>Washington Commanders</span>
    </div>
    <h2 id="pfm-rb-white">5. Rachaad White Is the Risk I&#8217;ll Take</h2>
    <p class="pfm-rb-rankline">
      <span><strong>PFM:</strong> RB33</span>
      <span>No. 89 overall</span>
      <span>ADP 107.1</span>
    </p>

    <p>
     I keep coming back to White as a high-upside value. With no clear RB1 in Washington, White has a chance to get some real volume. With new offensive coordinator David Blough running the show, what if Blough uses White in a Gibbs type role?
    </p>

    <p>
      What keeps me interested is that receiving role. White has already shown he can be one of the better pass-catching backs in football and Washington has talked about what his hands can add on third downs. I don&#8217;t need him getting 20 carries every week for that to matter in half-PPR.
    </p>

    <p>
      If White gets a real share of the rushing work and stays involved on passing downs with Jayden Daniels, I think he can beat an ADP outside the top 100. I&#8217;m not reaching much higher than that but where he is going right now, I&#8217;ll take the chance.
    </p>
  </section>

  <div class="pfm-rb-closing">
    <p>
      These aren&#8217;t five running backs I&#8217;m going to keep chasing no matter what happens over the next few weeks. A value pick stops being a value once the price climbs too high.
    </p>

    <p>
      Right now I have all five ranked ahead of where they are going. If the price stays there, I am going to end up with a lot of Price, Brooks, Tracy, Corum and White in my drafts.
    </p>

    <a class="pfm-rb-cta" href="/fantasy-football-rankings/">See My Full 2026 Half-PPR Rankings</a>
  </div>

  <p class="pfm-rb-freshness">
    PFM fantasy ranks and ADP were reviewed August 15, 2026. The live rankings board was last updated August 14, 2026.
  </p>
<p>
  My original Jadarian Price and Jonathon Brooks picks were also featured in the
  <a href="https://www.fantasypros.com/2026/08/running-back-sleepers-breakouts-experts-love-2026-fantasy-football/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">
    FantasyPros running back sleepers and breakouts roundup
  </a>.
</p>
  <details class="pfm-rb-source-review">
    <summary>Sources reviewed for rankings and current player context</summary>
    <div>
      <p>
        PFM ranks and ADP come from the current PFM fantasy rankings page. Team and training-camp details were checked against current reporting from the teams.
      </p>
      <ul>
        <li><a href="https://profootballmania.com/fantasy-football-rankings/">PFM: 2026 Fantasy Football Rankings</a></li>
        <li><a href="https://www.seahawks.com/news/training-camp-storylines-does-rookie-jadarian-price-win-the-starting-job" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Seattle Seahawks: Jadarian Price training-camp storyline</a></li>
        <li><a href="https://www.panthers.com/news/for-chuba-hubbard-the-carries-might-change-but-the-work-stays-the-same" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Carolina Panthers: Hubbard and Rico Dowdle workload</a></li>
        <li><a href="https://www.giants.com/news/notes-stats-cowboys-week-18-tyrone-tracy-jr-jaxson-dart-gunner-olszewski-brian-burns-2025" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">New York Giants: Tyrone Tracy Jr. back-to-back 1,000-yard seasons</a></li>
        <li><a href="https://www.therams.com/team/players-roster/blake-corum/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Los Angeles Rams: Blake Corum player statistics</a></li>
        <li><a href="https://www.commanders.com/news/commanders-confidence-running-back-room-rachaad-white" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Washington Commanders: Rachaad White and the running back room</a></li>
      </ul>
    </div>
  </details>
</article>
<p>The post <a href="https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/15/2026-fantasy-football-running-backs-above-adp/">5 Running Backs I’m Drafting Above ADP in 2026 Fantasy Football</a> appeared first on <a href="https://profootballmania.com">Pro Football Mania</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/15/2026-fantasy-football-running-backs-above-adp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">54497</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 NFL Contenders With One Red Flag PFM Can’t Ignore</title>
		<link>https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/12/2026-nfl-contenders-red-flags-pfm-ratings/</link>
					<comments>https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/12/2026-nfl-contenders-red-flags-pfm-ratings/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin Fuhr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 19:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PFM Ratings]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://profootballmania.com/?p=54399</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Every contender has something that can go wrong. The question is whether that weakness is small enough to survive or big enough to change the season. That is what stands out with these five teams. Buffalo has Josh Allen. Cincinnati has Joe Burrow and Ja’Marr Chase. Kansas City still has Patrick Mahomes and Andy Reid. [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/12/2026-nfl-contenders-red-flags-pfm-ratings/">5 NFL Contenders With One Red Flag PFM Can’t Ignore</a> appeared first on <a href="https://profootballmania.com">Pro Football Mania</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<style>
.pfm-ratings-red-flags,
.pfm-ratings-red-flags * {
  box-sizing: border-box;
}

.pfm-ratings-red-flags {
  --pfm-navy: #0b1f3a;
  --pfm-red: #8b0f1a;
  --pfm-red-dark: #6f0c15;
  --pfm-gold: #d6a313;
  --pfm-ink: #172033;
  --pfm-muted: #6b7280;
  --pfm-border: #e5e7eb;
  --pfm-soft: #f9fafb;
  color: var(--pfm-ink);
}

.pfm-ratings-red-flags p,
.pfm-ratings-red-flags li,
.pfm-ratings-red-flags td,
.pfm-ratings-red-flags th {
  font-size: 17px;
  line-height: 1.68;
}

.pfm-ratings-red-flags p {
  margin: 0 0 1.15em;
}

.pfm-ratings-red-flags a {
  color: var(--pfm-red);
  font-weight: 800;
  text-decoration-thickness: 2px;
  text-underline-offset: 3px;
}

.pfm-ratings-lede {
  margin-bottom: 1.1em !important;
  color: #263247;
  font-size: clamp(20px, 2.5vw, 24px) !important;
  line-height: 1.55 !important;
  font-weight: 700;
}

.pfm-ratings-note,
.pfm-ratings-callout {
  margin: 28px 0;
  padding: 21px 23px;
  border: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  border-left: 5px solid var(--pfm-red);
  border-radius: 12px;
  background: #fff;
  box-shadow: 0 8px 22px rgba(15, 23, 42, .06);
}

.pfm-ratings-note strong,
.pfm-ratings-callout strong {
  color: var(--pfm-navy);
}

.pfm-ratings-table-wrap {
  width: 100%;
  margin: 30px 0 40px;
  overflow-x: auto;
  -webkit-overflow-scrolling: touch;
  border: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  border-radius: 12px;
  background: #fff;
  box-shadow: 0 8px 22px rgba(15, 23, 42, .05);
}

.pfm-ratings-table {
  width: 100%;
  min-width: 680px;
  border-collapse: collapse;
}

.pfm-ratings-table caption {
  padding: 18px 20px;
  color: var(--pfm-navy);
  font-size: 20px;
  line-height: 1.3;
  font-weight: 900;
  text-align: left;
}

.pfm-ratings-table th {
  padding: 13px;
  border-bottom: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  background: var(--pfm-soft);
  color: var(--pfm-muted);
  font-size: 11px;
  line-height: 1.3;
  font-weight: 900;
  letter-spacing: .08em;
  text-align: left;
  text-transform: uppercase;
}

.pfm-ratings-table td {
  padding: 13px;
  border-bottom: 1px solid #f1f5f9;
  vertical-align: middle;
  font-size: 14px;
}

.pfm-ratings-table tbody tr:last-child td {
  border-bottom: 0;
}

.pfm-ratings-table__team {
  display: flex;
  gap: 10px;
  align-items: center;
  min-width: 170px;
}

.pfm-ratings-table__team img {
  display: block !important;
  width: 38px !important;
  height: 38px !important;
  max-width: 38px !important;
  object-fit: contain !important;
}

.pfm-ratings-table__team strong {
  display: block;
  color: var(--pfm-navy);
  font-size: 13px;
  line-height: 1.25;
}

.pfm-ratings-table__rank {
  color: var(--pfm-red);
  font-weight: 900;
}

.pfm-ratings-table__flag {
  color: var(--pfm-navy);
  font-weight: 800;
}

.pfm-ratings-team-card {
  margin: 34px 0 42px;
  overflow: hidden;
  border: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  border-radius: 14px;
  background: #fff;
  box-shadow: 0 10px 28px rgba(15, 23, 42, .06);
}

.pfm-ratings-team-card__head {
  display: grid;
  grid-template-columns: minmax(0, 1fr) auto;
  gap: 18px;
  align-items: center;
  padding: 20px 22px;
  border-top: 5px solid var(--pfm-red);
  background: var(--pfm-soft);
}

.pfm-ratings-team-card__identity {
  display: grid;
  grid-template-columns: 72px minmax(0, 1fr);
  gap: 15px;
  align-items: center;
  min-width: 0;
}

.pfm-ratings-team-card__logo {
  display: flex;
  width: 72px;
  height: 72px;
  align-items: center;
  justify-content: center;
  border: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  border-radius: 50%;
  background: #fff;
  box-shadow: 0 6px 16px rgba(15, 23, 42, .08);
}

.pfm-ratings-team-card__logo img {
  display: block !important;
  width: 54px !important;
  height: 54px !important;
  max-width: 54px !important;
  object-fit: contain !important;
}

.pfm-ratings-team-card__eyebrow {
  display: block;
  margin-bottom: 5px;
  color: var(--pfm-muted);
  font-size: 12px;
  line-height: 1.2;
  font-weight: 900;
  letter-spacing: .07em;
  text-transform: uppercase;
}

.pfm-ratings-team-card h2 {
  margin: 0 !important;
  color: var(--pfm-navy) !important;
  font-size: clamp(25px, 3vw, 32px) !important;
  line-height: 1.15 !important;
  letter-spacing: -.02em !important;
  text-transform: none !important;
}

.pfm-ratings-team-card__tag {
  min-width: 150px;
  padding: 10px 14px;
  border-radius: 999px;
  background: var(--pfm-navy);
  color: #fff;
  font-size: 12px;
  line-height: 1.25;
  font-weight: 900;
  letter-spacing: .04em;
  text-align: center;
  text-transform: uppercase;
}

.pfm-ratings-team-card__body {
  padding: 23px 22px 24px;
}

.pfm-ratings-team-card__body > :last-child {
  margin-bottom: 0;
}

.pfm-ratings-red-flags a.pfm-ratings-team-link,
.pfm-ratings-red-flags a.pfm-ratings-team-link:link,
.pfm-ratings-red-flags a.pfm-ratings-team-link:visited {
  display: inline-flex !important;
  width: auto !important;
  max-width: 100% !important;
  min-height: 42px !important;
  align-items: center !important;
  justify-content: center !important;
  margin-top: 4px !important;
  border: 1px solid var(--pfm-red) !important;
  border-radius: 999px !important;
  padding: 10px 16px !important;
  background: var(--pfm-red) !important;
  color: #fff !important;
  -webkit-text-fill-color: #fff !important;
  font-family: Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", Arial, sans-serif !important;
  font-size: 13px !important;
  line-height: 1.2 !important;
  font-weight: 900 !important;
  letter-spacing: 0 !important;
  text-align: center !important;
  text-decoration: none !important;
  text-transform: none !important;
  box-shadow: none !important;
  white-space: normal !important;
}

.pfm-ratings-red-flags a.pfm-ratings-team-link:hover,
.pfm-ratings-red-flags a.pfm-ratings-team-link:focus,
.pfm-ratings-red-flags a.pfm-ratings-team-link:active {
  border-color: var(--pfm-red-dark) !important;
  background: var(--pfm-red-dark) !important;
  color: #fff !important;
  -webkit-text-fill-color: #fff !important;
  text-decoration: none !important;
}

.pfm-ratings-red-flags a.pfm-ratings-team-link:focus-visible {
  outline: 3px solid var(--pfm-gold) !important;
  outline-offset: 3px !important;
}

.pfm-ratings-red-flags > h2 {
  margin: 2.15em 0 .65em;
  color: var(--pfm-navy);
  font-size: clamp(28px, 4vw, 38px);
  line-height: 1.12;
  letter-spacing: -.025em;
}

@media (max-width: 760px) {
  .pfm-ratings-red-flags p,
  .pfm-ratings-red-flags li,
  .pfm-ratings-red-flags td,
  .pfm-ratings-red-flags th {
    font-size: 16px;
  }

  .pfm-ratings-team-card {
    margin: 28px 0 34px;
  }

  .pfm-ratings-team-card__head {
    grid-template-columns: 1fr;
    gap: 14px;
    padding: 18px;
  }

  .pfm-ratings-team-card__identity {
    grid-template-columns: 60px minmax(0, 1fr);
    gap: 12px;
  }

  .pfm-ratings-team-card__logo {
    width: 60px;
    height: 60px;
  }

  .pfm-ratings-team-card__logo img {
    width: 46px !important;
    height: 46px !important;
    max-width: 46px !important;
  }

  .pfm-ratings-team-card__tag {
    width: max-content;
    max-width: 100%;
    min-width: 0;
  }

  .pfm-ratings-team-card__body,
  .pfm-ratings-note,
  .pfm-ratings-callout {
    padding: 19px 18px;
  }

  .pfm-ratings-red-flags a.pfm-ratings-team-link {
    width: 100% !important;
  }
}

@media (max-width: 360px) {
  .pfm-ratings-team-card__identity {
    grid-template-columns: 54px minmax(0, 1fr);
  }

  .pfm-ratings-team-card__logo {
    width: 54px;
    height: 54px;
  }

  .pfm-ratings-team-card__logo img {
    width: 42px !important;
    height: 42px !important;
    max-width: 42px !important;
  }

  .pfm-ratings-team-card h2 {
    font-size: 24px !important;
  }
}
</style>

<article class="pfm-ratings-red-flags">

<p class="pfm-ratings-lede">Every contender has something that can go wrong. The question is whether that weakness is small enough to survive or big enough to change the season.</p>

<p>That is what stands out with these five teams. Buffalo has Josh Allen. Cincinnati has Joe Burrow and Ja’Marr Chase. Kansas City still has Patrick Mahomes and Andy Reid. Baltimore has Lamar Jackson, and San Francisco still has a roster built to win now. Those are facts we already know but how glaring are the weaknesses?</p>

<p>PFM does not rank all five the same way, but each has enough to make a run. The concern is the one part of each team we are not ready to brush aside yet.</p>

<div class="pfm-ratings-note">
  <strong>Data snapshot:</strong>
  PFM rankings and ratings are current through August 11, 2026. The national consensus snapshot was updated July 30.
</div>

<div class="pfm-ratings-table-wrap" role="region" aria-label="Five NFL contenders and their biggest PFM red flags" tabindex="0">
<table class="pfm-ratings-table">
<caption>The PFM grade that stands out for each team</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope="col">Team</th>
<th scope="col">PFM Rank</th>
<th scope="col">Red Flag</th>
<th scope="col">Grade</th>
<th scope="col">NFL Rank</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
  <div class="pfm-ratings-table__team">
    <img loading="lazy" src="/images/teams/buf.png" alt="Buffalo Bills logo" width="38" height="38" loading="lazy" decoding="async">
    <strong>Buffalo Bills</strong>
  </div>
</td>
<td class="pfm-ratings-table__rank">No. 8</td>
<td class="pfm-ratings-table__flag">Coaching Direction</td>
<td>72.5</td>
<td>No. 27</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
  <div class="pfm-ratings-table__team">
    <img loading="lazy" src="/images/teams/cin.png" alt="Cincinnati Bengals logo" width="38" height="38" loading="lazy" decoding="async">
    <strong>Cincinnati Bengals</strong>
  </div>
</td>
<td class="pfm-ratings-table__rank">No. 16</td>
<td class="pfm-ratings-table__flag">Defense</td>
<td>73.0</td>
<td>No. 29</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
  <div class="pfm-ratings-table__team">
    <img loading="lazy" src="/images/teams/kc.png" alt="Kansas City Chiefs logo" width="38" height="38" loading="lazy" decoding="async">
    <strong>Kansas City Chiefs</strong>
  </div>
</td>
<td class="pfm-ratings-table__rank">No. 3</td>
<td class="pfm-ratings-table__flag">Recent Performance</td>
<td>75.6</td>
<td>No. 20</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
  <div class="pfm-ratings-table__team">
    <img loading="lazy" src="/images/teams/bal.png" alt="Baltimore Ravens logo" width="38" height="38" loading="lazy" decoding="async">
    <strong>Baltimore Ravens</strong>
  </div>
</td>
<td class="pfm-ratings-table__rank">No. 15</td>
<td class="pfm-ratings-table__flag">Coaching Direction</td>
<td>71.3</td>
<td>No. 31</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
  <div class="pfm-ratings-table__team">
    <img loading="lazy" src="/images/teams/sf.png" alt="San Francisco 49ers logo" width="38" height="38" loading="lazy" decoding="async">
    <strong>San Francisco 49ers</strong>
  </div>
</td>
<td class="pfm-ratings-table__rank">No. 5</td>
<td class="pfm-ratings-table__flag">Franchise Direction</td>
<td>75.5</td>
<td>No. 17</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>

<section class="pfm-ratings-team-card" aria-labelledby="pfm-red-flag-buf">
  <header class="pfm-ratings-team-card__head">
    <div class="pfm-ratings-team-card__identity">
      <div class="pfm-ratings-team-card__logo">
        <img loading="lazy" src="/images/teams/buf.png" alt="Buffalo Bills logo" width="54" height="54" loading="lazy" decoding="async">
      </div>
      <div>
        <span class="pfm-ratings-team-card__eyebrow">Buffalo Bills · PFM No. 8</span>
        <h2 id="pfm-red-flag-buf">The Staff Is the Question, Not Josh Allen</h2>
      </div>
    </div>
    <div class="pfm-ratings-team-card__tag">Coaching · No. 27</div>
  </header>
  <div class="pfm-ratings-team-card__body">
    <p>Buffalo is easy to buy. Josh Allen can cover up a lot, DJ Moore gives him another proven weapon and James Cook can punish teams that spend all afternoon worrying about the quarterback. PFM has the Bills as the No. 1 offense for a reason.</p>

    <p>For right now, the new coaching staff is the weakness. Joe Brady is moving from offensive coordinator to head coach, Pete Carmichael Jr. takes over the offense and Jim Leonhard gets the defense. PFM has Coaching Direction at 72.5, No. 27 in the league, because we are not ready to give a brand-new setup the benefit of the doubt before it handles a real game.</p>

    <p>Maybe that looks too cautious by October. If Brady handles the game-management side of the job and Leonhard can get the defense off the field without putting too much stress on the secondary, this concern can disappear fast. Right now, though, the staff is why Buffalo sits No. 8 instead of closer to the top four. It is not Josh Allen.</p>

    <a class="pfm-ratings-team-link" href="/nfl-team-dashboards/buffalo-bills/">View the Bills dashboard</a>
  </div>
</section>

<section class="pfm-ratings-team-card" aria-labelledby="pfm-red-flag-cin">
  <header class="pfm-ratings-team-card__head">
    <div class="pfm-ratings-team-card__identity">
      <div class="pfm-ratings-team-card__logo">
        <img loading="lazy" src="/images/teams/cin.png" alt="Cincinnati Bengals logo" width="54" height="54" loading="lazy" decoding="async">
      </div>
      <div>
        <span class="pfm-ratings-team-card__eyebrow">Cincinnati Bengals · PFM No. 16</span>
        <h2 id="pfm-red-flag-cin">Burrow Can’t Keep Covering for This Defense</h2>
      </div>
    </div>
    <div class="pfm-ratings-team-card__tag">Defense · No. 29</div>
  </header>
  <div class="pfm-ratings-team-card__body">
    <p>With Cincinnati, there is not much mystery. Joe Burrow and Ja’Marr Chase can keep the Bengals in almost any game. The defense is the part that is hard to get past. PFM has it 29th at 73.0, and that is a tough weakness to hide for an entire season.</p>

    <p>Shemar Stewart avoiding ligament damage was good news, but missing several weeks still matters for a front that already needs more dependable pressure. Newly acquired Dexter Lawrence will no doubt stablize the defensive line but someone else needs to step up. Cincinnati also gets one of the easier schedules in PFM, so there is a real path to beating the No. 16 ranking. The defense does not need to become great. It just cannot stay near the bottom of the league and keep forcing Burrow to win every game in the 30s.</p>

    <a class="pfm-ratings-team-link" href="/nfl-team-dashboards/cincinnati-bengals/">View the Bengals dashboard</a>
  </div>
</section>

<section class="pfm-ratings-team-card" aria-labelledby="pfm-red-flag-kc">
  <header class="pfm-ratings-team-card__head">
    <div class="pfm-ratings-team-card__identity">
      <div class="pfm-ratings-team-card__logo">
        <img loading="lazy" src="/images/teams/kc.png" alt="Kansas City Chiefs logo" width="54" height="54" loading="lazy" decoding="async">
      </div>
      <div>
        <span class="pfm-ratings-team-card__eyebrow">Kansas City Chiefs · PFM No. 3</span>
        <h2 id="pfm-red-flag-kc">PFM Is Betting on a Rebound</h2>
      </div>
    </div>
    <div class="pfm-ratings-team-card__tag">Recent Performance · No. 20</div>
  </header>
  <div class="pfm-ratings-team-card__body">
    <p>Kansas City is where PFM is taking its biggest swing. The Chiefs went 6-11 and missed the playoffs in 2025. We do not get to pretend that did not happen just because Patrick Mahomes and Andy Reid have fixed problems before.</p>

    <p>At the same time, we are not ready to treat 2025 like the new normal. PFM still has Kansas City’s roster fourth, the defense eighth and Coaching Direction first. That is why the Chiefs are No. 3 even with a Recent Performance grade of 75.6, No. 20 in the league.</p>

    <p>If Kansas City comes out flat again, this ranking is going to look too aggressive. That is the risk. PFM is betting that last season was the bad year, not the start of a real decline.</p>

    <a class="pfm-ratings-team-link" href="/nfl-team-dashboards/kansas-city-chiefs/">View the Chiefs dashboard</a>
  </div>
</section>

<section class="pfm-ratings-team-card" aria-labelledby="pfm-red-flag-bal">
  <header class="pfm-ratings-team-card__head">
    <div class="pfm-ratings-team-card__identity">
      <div class="pfm-ratings-team-card__logo">
        <img loading="lazy" src="/images/teams/bal.png" alt="Baltimore Ravens logo" width="54" height="54" loading="lazy" decoding="async">
      </div>
      <div>
        <span class="pfm-ratings-team-card__eyebrow">Baltimore Ravens · PFM No. 15</span>
        <h2 id="pfm-red-flag-bal">The New Staff Has a Lot to Prove Quickly</h2>
      </div>
    </div>
    <div class="pfm-ratings-team-card__tag">Coaching · No. 31</div>
  </header>
  <div class="pfm-ratings-team-card__body">
    <p>Baltimore is probably the one people will argue with the most. The Ravens are No. 7 in the national consensus, and it is easy to see why. Lamar Jackson is still Lamar Jackson, Derrick Henry keeps the run game dangerous and Trey Hendrickson gives the defense another proven pass rusher. PFM still has Baltimore down at No. 15.</p>

    <p>The reason is we are not giving the new staff John Harbaugh’s track record. Jesse Minter is the head coach now, Declan Doyle is running the offense and Anthony Weaver has the defense. PFM has Coaching Direction at 71.3, No. 31, because that is a lot of change around a team that should be trying to win right now.</p>

    <p>Minter may end up being excellent. The fourth-easiest schedule also gives Baltimore some room to settle in. But until we see the offense keep its rhythm with Jackson and the defense stay organized under the new structure, No. 15 feels more honest than pretending the transition is already solved.</p>

    <a class="pfm-ratings-team-link" href="/nfl-team-dashboards/baltimore-ravens/">View the Ravens dashboard</a>
  </div>
</section>

<section class="pfm-ratings-team-card" aria-labelledby="pfm-red-flag-sf">
  <header class="pfm-ratings-team-card__head">
    <div class="pfm-ratings-team-card__identity">
      <div class="pfm-ratings-team-card__logo">
        <img loading="lazy" src="/images/teams/sf.png" alt="San Francisco 49ers logo" width="54" height="54" loading="lazy" decoding="async">
      </div>
      <div>
        <span class="pfm-ratings-team-card__eyebrow">San Francisco 49ers · PFM No. 5</span>
        <h2 id="pfm-red-flag-sf">This Is More About 2027 Than Week 1</h2>
      </div>
    </div>
    <div class="pfm-ratings-team-card__tag">Direction · No. 17</div>
  </header>
  <div class="pfm-ratings-team-card__body">
    <p>San Francisco is different because this red flag does not have to stop the 49ers from winning in 2026. Brock Purdy, Christian McCaffrey and George Kittle are still the core of an offense Kyle Shanahan knows how to use. PFM has the roster sixth in the league, and this is still a team built to win now.</p>

    <p>The concern is how much room is left if another important player goes down. Ricky Pearsall is already out for the season with a PCL injury, and bringing Deebo Samuel back helps right now but also puts even more weight back on the veteran core. That is why Franchise Direction is only 75.5, No. 17, despite San Francisco sitting No. 5 overall.</p>

    <p>This is not PFM saying the 49ers are about to fall apart. It is saying the cushion is thinner than it used to be. Another major injury or a real drop-off from one of the veteran stars carrying the offense could change the way this team looks very quickly.</p>

    <a class="pfm-ratings-team-link" href="/nfl-team-dashboards/san-francisco-49ers/">View the 49ers dashboard</a>
  </div>
</section>

<h2>Which Red Flag Matters Most?</h2>

<p>Buffalo and Baltimore can calm a lot of this pretty quickly. If the new staffs look organized early, those coaching concerns get a lot smaller. Kansas City can make 2025 feel old with a strong start, and San Francisco can quiet most of this just by keeping the veteran core healthy.</p>

<p>If we had to pick one that is hardest to hide, it is Cincinnati. Burrow can erase a lot of mistakes. He cannot get the defense off the field on third down.</p>

<div class="pfm-ratings-callout">
  <strong>See the full rankings:</strong>
  Start with the <a href="/nfl-team-rankings/">2026 PFM NFL Power Rankings</a>, then compare PFM with the <a href="/nfl-consensus-power-rankings/">current NFL Consensus Power Rankings</a>.
</div>

<p>Which red flag would make you the most nervous heading into Week 1?</p>

</article>
<p>The post <a href="https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/12/2026-nfl-contenders-red-flags-pfm-ratings/">5 NFL Contenders With One Red Flag PFM Can’t Ignore</a> appeared first on <a href="https://profootballmania.com">Pro Football Mania</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/12/2026-nfl-contenders-red-flags-pfm-ratings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">54399</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>2026 Dynasty Trade Targets: 8 Players I&#8217;d Buy or Sell Before Week 1</title>
		<link>https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/10/2026-dynasty-trade-targets/</link>
					<comments>https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/10/2026-dynasty-trade-targets/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin Fuhr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 18:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Dynasty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://profootballmania.com/?p=54376</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>August is where dynasty managers can talk themselves into almost anything. One big practice becomes a breakout, one missed week becomes a collapse, and suddenly a player&#8217;s price has moved before we&#8217;ve seen a real snap. I&#8217;m not chasing every camp headline. I&#8217;m looking for the spots where the market price and my current dynasty [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/10/2026-dynasty-trade-targets/">2026 Dynasty Trade Targets: 8 Players I&#8217;d Buy or Sell Before Week 1</a> appeared first on <a href="https://profootballmania.com">Pro Football Mania</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<style>
.pfm-dynasty-targets {
  --pfm-red: #a70f1b;
  --pfm-red-dark: #850b15;
  --pfm-navy: #071c33;
  --pfm-gold: #d79a17;
  --pfm-text: #1f2937;
  --pfm-muted: #64748b;
  --pfm-border: #e5e7eb;
  --pfm-soft: #f8fafc;
  --pfm-white: #ffffff;
  max-width: 920px;
  margin: 0 auto;
  color: var(--pfm-text);
  font-size: 18px;
  line-height: 1.72;
}

.pfm-dynasty-targets * { box-sizing: border-box; }
.pfm-dynasty-targets p { margin: 0 0 1.1em; }
.pfm-dynasty-targets h2 {
  margin: 2.2em 0 .65em;
  color: #111827;
  font-size: clamp(1.55rem, 3vw, 2.05rem);
  line-height: 1.2;
}
.pfm-dynasty-targets h3 {
  margin: 1.35em 0 .55em;
  color: #111827;
  font-size: clamp(1.15rem, 2.2vw, 1.4rem);
  line-height: 1.25;
}
.pfm-dynasty-targets a {
  color: var(--pfm-red);
  text-decoration-thickness: 1px;
  text-underline-offset: 2px;
}
.pfm-dynasty-targets a:hover { color: var(--pfm-red-dark); }

.pfm-dt-dek {
  margin-bottom: 1.25em;
  color: #334155;
  font-size: 1.12em;
  font-weight: 600;
  line-height: 1.65;
}

.pfm-dt-freshness {
  margin: -.15em 0 1.6em;
  color: var(--pfm-muted);
  font-size: .9em;
}

.pfm-dt-callout,
.pfm-dt-final {
  margin: 1.7em 0 2em;
  padding: 1.25em 1.35em;
  border: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  border-top: 3px solid var(--pfm-red);
  border-left: 5px solid var(--pfm-gold);
  border-radius: 12px;
  background: var(--pfm-white);
}
.pfm-dt-callout h2,
.pfm-dt-final h2 { margin-top: 0; }
.pfm-dt-callout p:last-child,
.pfm-dt-final p:last-child { margin-bottom: 0; }

.pfm-dt-buttons {
  display: flex;
  flex-wrap: wrap;
  gap: 12px;
  margin: 1.05em 0 .1em;
}
.pfm-dynasty-targets a.pfm-dt-button,
.pfm-dynasty-targets a.pfm-dt-button:link,
.pfm-dynasty-targets a.pfm-dt-button:visited,
.pfm-dynasty-targets a.pfm-dt-button:focus,
.pfm-dynasty-targets a.pfm-dt-button:active {
  display: inline-flex !important;
  align-items: center;
  justify-content: center;
  min-height: 46px;
  padding: 11px 18px;
  border: 2px solid var(--pfm-red) !important;
  border-radius: 999px;
  background: var(--pfm-red) !important;
  color: #fff !important;
  -webkit-text-fill-color: #fff !important;
  font-size: .9em;
  font-weight: 800;
  line-height: 1.2;
  text-decoration: none !important;
  box-shadow: none !important;
}
.pfm-dynasty-targets a.pfm-dt-button:hover {
  border-color: var(--pfm-red-dark) !important;
  background: var(--pfm-red-dark) !important;
  color: #fff !important;
  -webkit-text-fill-color: #fff !important;
}
.pfm-dynasty-targets a.pfm-dt-button--secondary,
.pfm-dynasty-targets a.pfm-dt-button--secondary:link,
.pfm-dynasty-targets a.pfm-dt-button--secondary:visited,
.pfm-dynasty-targets a.pfm-dt-button--secondary:focus,
.pfm-dynasty-targets a.pfm-dt-button--secondary:active {
  border-color: var(--pfm-navy) !important;
  background: var(--pfm-navy) !important;
  color: #fff !important;
  -webkit-text-fill-color: #fff !important;
}
.pfm-dynasty-targets a.pfm-dt-button--secondary:hover {
  border-color: #020f1e !important;
  background: #020f1e !important;
  color: #fff !important;
  -webkit-text-fill-color: #fff !important;
}

.pfm-dt-table-wrap {
  width: 100%;
  margin: 1.2em 0 2em;
  overflow-x: auto;
  border: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  border-radius: 10px;
  background: #fff;
}
.pfm-dt-table {
  width: 100%;
  min-width: 720px;
  margin: 0;
  border-collapse: collapse;
  font-size: .92em;
}
.pfm-dt-table thead th {
  padding: 12px 13px;
  border-top: 3px solid var(--pfm-red);
  border-bottom: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  background: #f8fafc;
  color: #475569;
  font-size: .76em;
  font-weight: 800;
  letter-spacing: .035em;
  text-align: left;
  text-transform: uppercase;
  white-space: nowrap;
}
.pfm-dt-table tbody td {
  padding: 12px 13px;
  border-bottom: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  vertical-align: middle;
}
.pfm-dt-table tbody tr:nth-child(even) { background: #fbfcfd; }
.pfm-dt-table tbody tr:last-child td { border-bottom: 0; }
.pfm-dt-player { color: #111827; font-weight: 800; }
.pfm-dt-call {
  display: inline-block;
  padding: 4px 9px;
  border: 1px solid #d1d5db;
  border-radius: 999px;
  background: #fff;
  color: #334155;
  font-size: .76em;
  font-weight: 800;
  letter-spacing: .035em;
  text-transform: uppercase;
  white-space: nowrap;
}

.pfm-dt-section {
  margin-top: 2.65em;
  padding-top: .1em;
}
.pfm-dt-eyebrow {
  display: inline-block;
  margin-bottom: .45em;
  color: var(--pfm-red);
  font-size: .78em;
  font-weight: 900;
  letter-spacing: .08em;
  text-transform: uppercase;
}
.pfm-dt-section > h2 { margin-top: 0; }

.pfm-dt-player-head {
  display: flex;
  align-items: center;
  gap: 12px;
  margin: .15em 0 1em;
}
.pfm-dt-player-head h2 {
  margin: 0;
}
.pfm-dt-team-logo {
  width: 44px;
  height: 44px;
  object-fit: contain;
  flex: 0 0 44px;
}
.pfm-dt-team-meta {
  display: inline-block;
  margin-top: 4px;
  color: var(--pfm-muted);
  font-size: .78em;
  font-weight: 800;
  letter-spacing: .04em;
  text-transform: uppercase;
}

.pfm-dt-snapshot {
  display: grid;
  grid-template-columns: repeat(3, minmax(0, 1fr));
  gap: 10px;
  margin: 1.05em 0 1.35em;
}
.pfm-dt-stat {
  padding: 12px 13px;
  border: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  border-radius: 10px;
  background: #fff;
}
.pfm-dt-stat-label {
  display: block;
  margin-bottom: 2px;
  color: var(--pfm-muted);
  font-size: .7em;
  font-weight: 800;
  letter-spacing: .04em;
  text-transform: uppercase;
}
.pfm-dt-stat-value {
  display: block;
  color: #111827;
  font-size: 1.02em;
  font-weight: 850;
  line-height: 1.3;
}

.pfm-dt-trade-box {
  margin: 1.35em 0;
  padding: 1.15em 1.25em;
  border: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  border-radius: 12px;
  background: var(--pfm-soft);
}
.pfm-dt-trade-box h3 { margin-top: 0; }
.pfm-dt-trade-side {
  display: grid;
  grid-template-columns: 88px minmax(0, 1fr);
  gap: 12px;
  padding: 7px 0;
  border-bottom: 1px solid #e2e8f0;
}
.pfm-dt-trade-side:last-of-type { border-bottom: 0; }
.pfm-dt-trade-label { color: #475569; font-weight: 800; }
.pfm-dt-trade-assets { color: #111827; font-weight: 750; }
.pfm-dt-price-note { margin: .9em 0 0; }

.pfm-dt-source {
  margin-top: .7em;
  color: var(--pfm-muted);
  font-size: .84em;
}
.pfm-dt-source a { font-weight: 700; }

.pfm-dt-market-note {
  margin: 2.2em 0;
  padding: 1.35em;
  border-top: 3px solid var(--pfm-red);
  border-bottom: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  background: var(--pfm-soft);
}
.pfm-dt-market-note h2 { margin-top: 0; }

.pfm-dt-link-list {
  display: grid;
  grid-template-columns: repeat(2, minmax(0, 1fr));
  gap: 12px;
  margin: 1.25em 0 .2em;
}
.pfm-dt-link-card {
  display: block;
  padding: 13px 14px;
  border: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  border-radius: 10px;
  background: #fff;
  font-weight: 800;
  text-decoration: none !important;
}
.pfm-dt-link-card span {
  display: block;
  margin-top: 3px;
  color: var(--pfm-muted);
  font-size: .8em;
  font-weight: 500;
}

.pfm-dt-disclosure {
  margin-top: 2em;
  padding-top: 1em;
  border-top: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  color: var(--pfm-muted);
  font-size: .8em;
}

@media (max-width: 700px) {
  .pfm-dynasty-targets { font-size: 17px; }
  .pfm-dt-snapshot { grid-template-columns: 1fr; }
  .pfm-dt-link-list { grid-template-columns: 1fr; }
  .pfm-dt-buttons { flex-direction: column; }
  .pfm-dt-button { width: 100%; }
  .pfm-dt-trade-side { grid-template-columns: 1fr; gap: 1px; }
  .pfm-dt-table { font-size: .88em; }
  .pfm-dt-table thead th,
  .pfm-dt-table tbody td { padding: 10px 9px; }
}
</style>

<div class="pfm-dynasty-targets">

  <p class="pfm-dt-dek">
    August is where dynasty managers can talk themselves into almost anything. One big practice becomes a breakout, one missed week becomes a collapse, and suddenly a player&#8217;s price has moved before we&#8217;ve seen a real snap. I&#8217;m not chasing every camp headline. I&#8217;m looking for the spots where the market price and my current dynasty board are far enough apart that I&#8217;m willing to act.
  </p>

  <p>
    These are my dynasty trade targets before Week 1. Four are players I&#8217;m trying to buy, three are players I&#8217;d shop if the market still pays the higher price, and one is a player where I&#8217;m letting the offer decide what I do. Every example below is for a 12-team PPR, 1-QB league unless noted otherwise.
  </p>

  <p class="pfm-dt-freshness">
    PFM Dynasty rankings were updated <strong>August 9, 2026</strong>. FantasyPros Dynasty ECR was checked <strong>August 10, 2026</strong> and is used only as a market reference.
  </p>

  <div class="pfm-dt-callout">
    <h2>Start With the Current Price</h2>
    <p>
      Before I send anything, I want to know where the player sits on my board and how far I have to move to get him. The PFM Dynasty Trade Value Chart gives me the current player and future-pick prices, while the Dynasty Trade Calculator lets me build the full deal.
    </p>
    <p>
      I still care more about the best asset and the tier I&#8217;m moving into than making two numbers match perfectly. If I can turn a player I have lower into one I have much higher without adding much, that&#8217;s the kind of deal I want to attack.
    </p>
    <div class="pfm-dt-buttons">
      <a class="pfm-dt-button" href="https://profootballmania.com/dynasty-trade-value-chart/">View Dynasty Trade Values</a>
      <a class="pfm-dt-button pfm-dt-button--secondary" href="https://profootballmania.com/dynasty-trade-calculator/">Open the Trade Calculator</a>
    </div>
  </div>

  <h2>My 2026 Dynasty Trade Targets Before Week 1</h2>

  <div class="pfm-dt-table-wrap" aria-label="2026 dynasty trade targets summary">
    <table class="pfm-dt-table">
      <thead>
        <tr>
          <th>Player</th>
          <th>PFM</th>
          <th>Dynasty ECR</th>
          <th>Call</th>
          <th>My Price</th>
        </tr>
      </thead>
      <tbody>
        <tr>
          <td class="pfm-dt-player">A.J. Brown</td>
          <td>#27 &middot; WR14</td>
          <td>WR20</td>
          <td><span class="pfm-dt-call">Buy</span></td>
          <td>Luther Burden III straight up</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <td class="pfm-dt-player">Christian Watson</td>
          <td>#39 &middot; WR22</td>
          <td>WR30</td>
          <td><span class="pfm-dt-call">Buy</span></td>
          <td>Makai Lemon straight up</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <td class="pfm-dt-player">Christian McCaffrey</td>
          <td>#23 &middot; RB9</td>
          <td>RB15</td>
          <td><span class="pfm-dt-call">Buy</span></td>
          <td>Breece Hall straight up on a contender</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <td class="pfm-dt-player">TreVeyon Henderson</td>
          <td>#43 &middot; RB12</td>
          <td>RB12</td>
          <td><span class="pfm-dt-call">Buy</span></td>
          <td>Projected late 2027 1st</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <td class="pfm-dt-player">Breece Hall</td>
          <td>#58 &middot; RB16</td>
          <td>RB10</td>
          <td><span class="pfm-dt-call">Sell at market</span></td>
          <td>Ask for Henderson + a 2027 2nd</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <td class="pfm-dt-player">Makai Lemon</td>
          <td>#54 &middot; WR29</td>
          <td>WR24</td>
          <td><span class="pfm-dt-call">Sell</span></td>
          <td>Christian Watson straight up</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <td class="pfm-dt-player">Luther Burden III</td>
          <td>#64 &middot; WR31</td>
          <td>WR19</td>
          <td><span class="pfm-dt-call">Sell</span></td>
          <td>A.J. Brown straight up</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <td class="pfm-dt-player">Brian Thomas Jr.</td>
          <td>#66 &middot; WR32</td>
          <td>WR29</td>
          <td><span class="pfm-dt-call">Price dependent</span></td>
          <td>Buy below a 1st &middot; sell for a late 1st</td>
        </tr>
      </tbody>
    </table>
  </div>

  <section class="pfm-dt-section">
    <span class="pfm-dt-eyebrow">Dynasty Buy No. 1</span>
    <div class="pfm-dt-player-head"><img decoding="async" class="pfm-dt-team-logo" src="https://a.espncdn.com/i/teamlogos/nfl/500/scoreboard/ne.png" alt="New England Patriots logo"><div><h2>A.J. Brown: I&#8217;ll Take the Veteran Discount</h2><span class="pfm-dt-team-meta">New England Patriots &middot; WR</span></div></div>

    <div class="pfm-dt-snapshot">
      <div class="pfm-dt-stat"><span class="pfm-dt-stat-label">PFM Rank</span><span class="pfm-dt-stat-value">#27 &middot; WR14</span></div>
      <div class="pfm-dt-stat"><span class="pfm-dt-stat-label">FantasyPros ECR</span><span class="pfm-dt-stat-value">WR20</span></div>
      <div class="pfm-dt-stat"><span class="pfm-dt-stat-label">Age</span><span class="pfm-dt-stat-value">29</span></div>
    </div>

    <p>
      Brown is 29, so I get why dynasty managers are ready to move him down. I just think the discount has gone too far. I still have him at WR14, and FantasyPros Dynasty ECR has him at WR20. That&#8217;s enough of a gap for me to start checking whether his manager is trying to get younger just for the sake of getting younger.
    </p>

    <p>
      The move to New England doesn&#8217;t scare me. Brown has finished as a WR1 in fantasy points per game in four straight seasons, and last year he still commanded a 27.5% target share. Now he gets Drake Maye in an offense that threw at a higher neutral rate than Philadelphia did last season. The Patriots have also been getting real work out of the Maye-Brown connection throughout camp.
    </p>

    <p>
      I&#8217;m not buying him because I expect five more elite seasons. I think he still has multiple high-end years left, and the market is starting to price him like the drop-off is already here.
    </p>

    <div class="pfm-dt-trade-box">
      <h3>The Deal I&#8217;d Send</h3>
      <div class="pfm-dt-trade-side"><div class="pfm-dt-trade-label">I&#8217;d give</div><div class="pfm-dt-trade-assets">Luther Burden III</div></div>
      <div class="pfm-dt-trade-side"><div class="pfm-dt-trade-label">I&#8217;d want</div><div class="pfm-dt-trade-assets">A.J. Brown</div></div>
      <p class="pfm-dt-price-note">
        This is exactly the type of market gap I want to use. Burden is WR19 in current Dynasty ECR while Brown is WR20, so the consensus market can justify the deal. My board has Brown WR14 and Burden WR31. If I can make that swap straight up on a team trying to win, I&#8217;m doing it. I would not add a future first on top of Burden.
      </p>
    </div>

 
  </section>

  <section class="pfm-dt-section">
    <span class="pfm-dt-eyebrow">Dynasty Buy No. 2</span>
    <div class="pfm-dt-player-head"><img decoding="async" class="pfm-dt-team-logo" src="https://a.espncdn.com/i/teamlogos/nfl/500/scoreboard/gb.png" alt="Green Bay Packers logo"><div><h2>Christian Watson: The Price Still Hasn&#8217;t Caught Up</h2><span class="pfm-dt-team-meta">Green Bay Packers &middot; WR</span></div></div>

    <div class="pfm-dt-snapshot">
      <div class="pfm-dt-stat"><span class="pfm-dt-stat-label">PFM Rank</span><span class="pfm-dt-stat-value">#39 &middot; WR22</span></div>
      <div class="pfm-dt-stat"><span class="pfm-dt-stat-label">FantasyPros ECR</span><span class="pfm-dt-stat-value">WR30</span></div>
      <div class="pfm-dt-stat"><span class="pfm-dt-stat-label">PFM Gap</span><span class="pfm-dt-stat-value">8 WR spots higher</span></div>
    </div>

    <p>
      Watson is one of the easier buys on my board because the market still seems to be pricing in the old version of his role. I have him at WR22. Current Dynasty ECR has him at WR30, and that gap looks too wide after the way Green Bay used him when he was healthy last year.
    </p>

    <p>
      From Weeks 8-18, Watson was WR21 in fantasy points per game while playing only a 68% route share. He averaged 61.1 receiving yards per game and 2.67 yards per route run during that stretch. Romeo Doubs and Dontayvion Wicks are gone, Watson signed a four-year extension, and Green Bay&#8217;s own camp coverage has repeatedly pointed to a strong start for him this summer.
    </p>

    <p>
      Injuries are still part of the price. I&#8217;m not pretending they don&#8217;t exist. But if the role is finally moving toward full-time work, I don&#8217;t want to wait until September to pay for the breakout after everybody can see it.
    </p>

    <div class="pfm-dt-trade-box">
      <h3>The Deal I&#8217;d Try</h3>
      <div class="pfm-dt-trade-side"><div class="pfm-dt-trade-label">I&#8217;d give</div><div class="pfm-dt-trade-assets">Makai Lemon</div></div>
      <div class="pfm-dt-trade-side"><div class="pfm-dt-trade-label">I&#8217;d want</div><div class="pfm-dt-trade-assets">Christian Watson</div></div>
      <p class="pfm-dt-price-note">
        Current ECR prefers Lemon at WR24 to Watson at WR30. I have Watson WR22 and Lemon WR29. If a rookie-focused manager will take Lemon straight up, I&#8217;d rather have the receiver who has already shown he can win NFL routes and produce when healthy. I would not add a meaningful future pick just to force it.
      </p>
    </div>

  </section>

  <section class="pfm-dt-section">
    <span class="pfm-dt-eyebrow">Dynasty Buy No. 3</span>
    <div class="pfm-dt-player-head"><img decoding="async" class="pfm-dt-team-logo" src="https://a.espncdn.com/i/teamlogos/nfl/500/scoreboard/sf.png" alt="San Francisco 49ers logo"><div><h2>Christian McCaffrey: I&#8217;m Buying the Window, Not the Age</h2><span class="pfm-dt-team-meta">San Francisco 49ers &middot; RB</span></div></div>

    <div class="pfm-dt-snapshot">
      <div class="pfm-dt-stat"><span class="pfm-dt-stat-label">PFM Rank</span><span class="pfm-dt-stat-value">#23 &middot; RB9</span></div>
      <div class="pfm-dt-stat"><span class="pfm-dt-stat-label">FantasyPros ECR</span><span class="pfm-dt-stat-value">RB15</span></div>
      <div class="pfm-dt-stat"><span class="pfm-dt-stat-label">2025 Touches</span><span class="pfm-dt-stat-value">413</span></div>
    </div>

    <p>
      McCaffrey is not the buy for every dynasty roster. If I&#8217;m rebuilding, I&#8217;m not sending young assets for a 30-year-old running back. If I&#8217;m a contender, this is exactly the kind of age discount I&#8217;m willing to take because McCaffrey can still win me a league.
    </p>

    <p>
      He led the NFL with 413 touches last season and finished as the RB1 in fantasy points per game. San Francisco also got 102 catches and 924 receiving yards out of him, so this wasn&#8217;t a back surviving on touchdowns. The rushing efficiency slipped, and the 49ers have talked about managing the wear, but the receiving role still gives him a way to stay elite even if the carries come down.
    </p>

    <p>
      Dynasty managers can get so focused on the age cliff that they sell a useful season or two too early. I don&#8217;t want McCaffrey at a young-RB price, but I absolutely want him if another manager is discounting what he can still do just because he&#8217;s 30.
    </p>

    <div class="pfm-dt-trade-box">
      <h3>The Contender Swap I&#8217;d Make</h3>
      <div class="pfm-dt-trade-side"><div class="pfm-dt-trade-label">I&#8217;d give</div><div class="pfm-dt-trade-assets">Breece Hall</div></div>
      <div class="pfm-dt-trade-side"><div class="pfm-dt-trade-label">I&#8217;d want</div><div class="pfm-dt-trade-assets">Christian McCaffrey</div></div>
      <p class="pfm-dt-price-note">
        ECR has Hall RB10 and McCaffrey RB15. My board has that order flipped, with McCaffrey RB9 and Hall RB16. On a real contender, I&#8217;d make the straight-up swap. On a rebuilding roster, I wouldn&#8217;t. Team direction matters here more than pretending there is one answer for every dynasty roster.
      </p>
    </div>

  </section>

  <section class="pfm-dt-section">
    <span class="pfm-dt-eyebrow">Dynasty Buy No. 4</span>
    <div class="pfm-dt-player-head"><img decoding="async" class="pfm-dt-team-logo" src="https://a.espncdn.com/i/teamlogos/nfl/500/scoreboard/ne.png" alt="New England Patriots logo"><div><h2>TreVeyon Henderson: This Is the Dip I&#8217;d Buy</h2><span class="pfm-dt-team-meta">New England Patriots &middot; RB</span></div></div>

    <div class="pfm-dt-snapshot">
      <div class="pfm-dt-stat"><span class="pfm-dt-stat-label">PFM Rank</span><span class="pfm-dt-stat-value">#43 &middot; RB12</span></div>
      <div class="pfm-dt-stat"><span class="pfm-dt-stat-label">FantasyPros ECR</span><span class="pfm-dt-stat-value">RB12</span></div>
      <div class="pfm-dt-stat"><span class="pfm-dt-stat-label">My Pick Ceiling</span><span class="pfm-dt-stat-value">Late 2027 1st</span></div>
    </div>

    <p>
      Henderson isn&#8217;t a buy because PFM is way above consensus. We&#8217;re not. I have him RB12 and current Dynasty ECR also has him RB12. The buy is about finding the manager who expected him to take the entire New England backfield as a rookie and is now disappointed that Rhamondre Stevenson is still involved.
    </p>

    <p>
      The split last season was real. With Stevenson active, Henderson averaged 11.2 touches and 57.2 total yards per game. Without him in Weeks 9-11, that jumped to 19 touches and 110 total yards. Henderson still has work to do as a runner and in pass protection, but he already showed what the ceiling looks like when the workload opens.
    </p>

    <p>
      I don&#8217;t need New England to hand him 20 touches in September. At 23 years old, I&#8217;m buying the chance that his role grows instead of paying the full price after it happens.
    </p>

    <div class="pfm-dt-trade-box">
      <h3>What I&#8217;d Pay</h3>
      <div class="pfm-dt-trade-side"><div class="pfm-dt-trade-label">I&#8217;d give</div><div class="pfm-dt-trade-assets">Projected late 2027 1st</div></div>
      <div class="pfm-dt-trade-side"><div class="pfm-dt-trade-label">I&#8217;d want</div><div class="pfm-dt-trade-assets">TreVeyon Henderson</div></div>
      <p class="pfm-dt-price-note">
        On the current PFM 12-team 1-QB chart, a projected late 2027 first is worth 3,640. That&#8217;s about where I&#8217;m comfortable starting. If the price becomes a 2027 first plus another young player I actually care about, I&#8217;m out. I like Henderson, but I don&#8217;t need to win the trade in August.
      </p>
    </div>

 
  </section>

  <section class="pfm-dt-section">
    <span class="pfm-dt-eyebrow">Dynasty Sell No. 1</span>
    <div class="pfm-dt-player-head"><img decoding="async" class="pfm-dt-team-logo" src="https://a.espncdn.com/i/teamlogos/nfl/500/scoreboard/nyj.png" alt="New York Jets logo"><div><h2>Breece Hall: I&#8217;m Selling Only If I Get the RB10 Price</h2><span class="pfm-dt-team-meta">New York Jets &middot; RB</span></div></div>

    <div class="pfm-dt-snapshot">
      <div class="pfm-dt-stat"><span class="pfm-dt-stat-label">PFM Rank</span><span class="pfm-dt-stat-value">#58 &middot; RB16</span></div>
      <div class="pfm-dt-stat"><span class="pfm-dt-stat-label">FantasyPros ECR</span><span class="pfm-dt-stat-value">RB10</span></div>
      <div class="pfm-dt-stat"><span class="pfm-dt-stat-label">2025 Finish</span><span class="pfm-dt-stat-value">RB20 PPG</span></div>
    </div>

    <p>
      Hall is not a panic sell. The Jets gave him a three-year extension, the offensive line was creating room last season, and he still ranked near the top of the league in explosive-run and missed-tackle rate. There is a real bounce-back case here.
    </p>

    <p>
      My issue is the price. Hall finished as RB20 in fantasy points per game last year, his target share fell to a career-low 10.9%, and I currently have him RB16 in dynasty. FantasyPros ECR still has him RB10. If another manager is willing to pay the top-10 dynasty RB price, I&#8217;m going to use it.
    </p>

    <p>
      I&#8217;m not saying Hall is about to fall off. If the offers are weak, I&#8217;m keeping him. But if another manager still wants to pay the RB10 price, I&#8217;m listening.
    </p>

    <div class="pfm-dt-trade-box">
      <h3>The Return I&#8217;d Ask For</h3>
      <div class="pfm-dt-trade-side"><div class="pfm-dt-trade-label">I&#8217;d give</div><div class="pfm-dt-trade-assets">Breece Hall</div></div>
      <div class="pfm-dt-trade-side"><div class="pfm-dt-trade-label">I&#8217;d want</div><div class="pfm-dt-trade-assets">TreVeyon Henderson + 2027 2nd</div></div>
      <p class="pfm-dt-price-note">
        I&#8217;d start by asking for Henderson plus a 2027 second because the market still has Hall two RB spots ahead of him. If the other manager comes back with Henderson straight up, I still have a decision to make because my own board has Henderson four RB spots higher. What I&#8217;m not doing is dumping Hall for a random first just because I&#8217;m lower than consensus.
      </p>
    </div>
  </section>

  <section class="pfm-dt-section">
    <span class="pfm-dt-eyebrow">Dynasty Sell No. 2</span>
    <div class="pfm-dt-player-head"><img decoding="async" class="pfm-dt-team-logo" src="https://a.espncdn.com/i/teamlogos/nfl/500/scoreboard/phi.png" alt="Philadelphia Eagles logo"><div><h2>Makai Lemon: I Like the Player More Than the Current Price</h2><span class="pfm-dt-team-meta">Philadelphia Eagles &middot; WR</span></div></div>

    <div class="pfm-dt-snapshot">
      <div class="pfm-dt-stat"><span class="pfm-dt-stat-label">PFM Rank</span><span class="pfm-dt-stat-value">#54 &middot; WR29</span></div>
      <div class="pfm-dt-stat"><span class="pfm-dt-stat-label">FantasyPros ECR</span><span class="pfm-dt-stat-value">WR24</span></div>
      <div class="pfm-dt-stat"><span class="pfm-dt-stat-label">Draft Capital</span><span class="pfm-dt-stat-value">Round 1 &middot; Pick 20</span></div>
    </div>

    <p>
      Lemon is a good dynasty prospect. Philadelphia traded up for him in the first round, he can play inside or outside, and I understand why managers want to bet on the rookie before we&#8217;ve even seen the full role. I just don&#8217;t want to pay WR24 prices for that bet yet.
    </p>

    <p>
      DeVonta Smith and Dallas Goedert are already going to command targets, and Lemon has now missed close to a week with a hamstring injury. That injury isn&#8217;t why I&#8217;m selling. It just takes away some of the camp reps that could have made an already crowded rookie-year path easier.
    </p>

    <p>
      I have Lemon WR29, only five spots below ECR, so this isn&#8217;t some massive fade. It&#8217;s a spot where I&#8217;d rather cash in the rookie premium for a receiver I already know can produce at the NFL level.
    </p>

    <div class="pfm-dt-trade-box">
      <h3>The Swap I&#8217;d Make</h3>
      <div class="pfm-dt-trade-side"><div class="pfm-dt-trade-label">I&#8217;d give</div><div class="pfm-dt-trade-assets">Makai Lemon</div></div>
      <div class="pfm-dt-trade-side"><div class="pfm-dt-trade-label">I&#8217;d want</div><div class="pfm-dt-trade-assets">Christian Watson</div></div>
      <p class="pfm-dt-price-note">
        This is the same market gap from the Watson section in reverse. If somebody prefers Lemon&#8217;s age and draft capital, I&#8217;m happy to take Watson&#8217;s proven production and clearer 2026 role. If I have to add a second on top of Lemon, the value stops making sense for me.
      </p>
    </div>

  </section>

  <section class="pfm-dt-section">
    <span class="pfm-dt-eyebrow">Dynasty Sell No. 3</span>
    <div class="pfm-dt-player-head"><img decoding="async" class="pfm-dt-team-logo" src="https://a.espncdn.com/i/teamlogos/nfl/500/scoreboard/chi.png" alt="Chicago Bears logo"><div><h2>Luther Burden III: The Market Is Paying for the Breakout Early</h2><span class="pfm-dt-team-meta">Chicago Bears &middot; WR</span></div></div>

    <div class="pfm-dt-snapshot">
      <div class="pfm-dt-stat"><span class="pfm-dt-stat-label">PFM Rank</span><span class="pfm-dt-stat-value">#64 &middot; WR31</span></div>
      <div class="pfm-dt-stat"><span class="pfm-dt-stat-label">FantasyPros ECR</span><span class="pfm-dt-stat-value">WR19</span></div>
      <div class="pfm-dt-stat"><span class="pfm-dt-stat-label">PFM/ECR Gap</span><span class="pfm-dt-stat-value">12 WR spots</span></div>
    </div>

    <p>
      Burden is probably the player in this article people will push back on the most, and I understand it. He finished his rookie year much better than he started it, Ben Johnson spent the spring talking him up, and the Bears moved DJ Moore out of the way. There is a real breakout case.
    </p>

    <p>
      I&#8217;m still selling if someone values him like WR19. Burden had 47 catches for 652 yards in the regular season, and now a groin injury is expected to cost him the preseason even though the early expectation is that he can return around Week 1. Rome Odunze and Colston Loveland aren&#8217;t going anywhere, either. I like Burden. I just don&#8217;t have him anywhere close to the current market price.
    </p>

    <p>
      I don&#8217;t think Burden is a bad dynasty asset. I just think WR19 is a price I&#8217;d rather sell than pay.
    </p>

    <div class="pfm-dt-trade-box">
      <h3>The Veteran I&#8217;d Take Instead</h3>
      <div class="pfm-dt-trade-side"><div class="pfm-dt-trade-label">I&#8217;d give</div><div class="pfm-dt-trade-assets">Luther Burden III</div></div>
      <div class="pfm-dt-trade-side"><div class="pfm-dt-trade-label">I&#8217;d want</div><div class="pfm-dt-trade-assets">A.J. Brown</div></div>
      <p class="pfm-dt-price-note">
        ECR has Burden one spot ahead of Brown. My board has Brown 17 overall spots ahead of Burden. That&#8217;s exactly when I want to see if the other manager is willing to trade proven WR1 production for age. If I&#8217;m rebuilding from the ground up, I can justify keeping Burden. If I&#8217;m anywhere near contention, I want Brown.
      </p>
    </div>

  </section>

  <section class="pfm-dt-section">
    <span class="pfm-dt-eyebrow">One I&#8217;m Not Forcing</span>
    <div class="pfm-dt-player-head"><img decoding="async" class="pfm-dt-team-logo" src="https://a.espncdn.com/i/teamlogos/nfl/500/scoreboard/jax.png" alt="Jacksonville Jaguars logo"><div><h2>Brian Thomas Jr.: I&#8217;m Letting the Offer Decide</h2><span class="pfm-dt-team-meta">Jacksonville Jaguars &middot; WR</span></div></div>

    <div class="pfm-dt-snapshot">
      <div class="pfm-dt-stat"><span class="pfm-dt-stat-label">PFM Rank</span><span class="pfm-dt-stat-value">#66 &middot; WR32</span></div>
      <div class="pfm-dt-stat"><span class="pfm-dt-stat-label">FantasyPros ECR</span><span class="pfm-dt-stat-value">WR29</span></div>
      <div class="pfm-dt-stat"><span class="pfm-dt-stat-label">2025 Receiving</span><span class="pfm-dt-stat-value">48 &middot; 707 &middot; 2 TD</span></div>
    </div>

    <p>
      Thomas is the player where I&#8217;m not interested in forcing a trade. Last season was a mess compared with the breakout rookie year. Injuries kept interrupting him, he caught 48 passes for 707 yards and two touchdowns, and Trevor Lawrence admitted there were times when the two of them weren&#8217;t on the same page.
    </p>

    <p>
      The reason I&#8217;m not selling low is that the camp reports have been much better. Lawrence says their chemistry has taken a huge step, and Jacksonville&#8217;s own coverage has repeatedly highlighted Thomas during a strong camp. The talent didn&#8217;t disappear. What I need to see is whether the offense actually puts him back in a role that deserves the old dynasty price.
    </p>

    <p>
      PFM has him WR32 and current Dynasty ECR is WR29. That&#8217;s close enough that I don&#8217;t see a market mistake I have to attack. I see a player where a discounted offer can make me a buyer and an aggressive offer can make me a seller.
    </p>

    <div class="pfm-dt-trade-box">
      <h3>The Price That Changes My Mind</h3>
      <div class="pfm-dt-trade-side"><div class="pfm-dt-trade-label">Buy below</div><div class="pfm-dt-trade-assets">A future 1st. An early 2027 2nd plus a small piece gets my attention.</div></div>
      <div class="pfm-dt-trade-side"><div class="pfm-dt-trade-label">Sell above</div><div class="pfm-dt-trade-assets">A projected late 2027 1st.</div></div>
      <p class="pfm-dt-price-note">
        PFM currently prices an early 2027 second at 2,840 and a projected late 2027 first at 3,640 in a 12-team 1-QB league. I&#8217;m not paying the first while the role is still being rebuilt. If somebody offers me that first, I&#8217;m comfortable taking the reset. In between those prices, I&#8217;m holding and watching September.
      </p>
    </div>

  </section>

  <div class="pfm-dt-market-note">
    <h2>Where My Dynasty Board Is Different From the Market</h2>
    <p>
      I don&#8217;t want the PFM rankings to turn into ECR with a different logo. Consensus is useful because it tells me what I might actually have to pay, but it doesn&#8217;t make the decision for me. If I&#8217;m 10 or 12 positional spots away from the market, I want a football reason for it.
    </p>
    <p>
      The biggest gaps are the ones I care about. ECR has Burden one WR spot ahead of Brown, while my board has Brown 17 overall spots higher. Watson and Lemon give me another spot where I&#8217;d rather take the proven NFL production. Those are the differences that can actually turn into trades.
    </p>
    <p>
      The trade itself still matters more than the headline. A 3-for-1 isn&#8217;t automatically good because the smaller values add up, and a contender shouldn&#8217;t make the same decision as a rebuild. That&#8217;s why I use the rankings to set the order, the <a href="https://profootballmania.com/dynasty-trade-value-chart/"><strong>Trade Value Chart</strong></a> to check the price and the <a href="https://profootballmania.com/dynasty-trade-calculator/"><strong>Trade Calculator</strong></a> to look at the whole offer.
    </p>

    <div class="pfm-dt-link-list">
      <a class="pfm-dt-link-card" href="https://profootballmania.com/dynasty-fantasy-football-rankings/">2026 Dynasty Rankings<span>Current 1-QB PPR rankings and tiers.</span></a>
      <a class="pfm-dt-link-card" href="https://profootballmania.com/superflex-dynasty-rankings/">2026 Superflex Dynasty Rankings<span>See how the board changes when a second quarterback can start.</span></a>
    </div>
  </div>

  <div class="pfm-dt-final">
    <h2>Run the Trade Before You Send It</h2>
    <p>
      If another manager sees a player differently than I do, that&#8217;s where a deal gets interesting. The rankings tell me who I&#8217;d rather own, and the trade value tells me whether I can actually get there without forcing it.
    </p>
    <p>
      If you have an offer sitting in your inbox, check the current values and build both sides. If I&#8217;m moving into the better tier without giving away another asset I actually need, I&#8217;m willing to be aggressive.
    </p>
    <div class="pfm-dt-buttons">
      <a class="pfm-dt-button" href="https://profootballmania.com/dynasty-trade-calculator/">Analyze Your Dynasty Trade</a>
      <a class="pfm-dt-button pfm-dt-button--secondary" href="https://profootballmania.com/dynasty-trade-value-chart/">View Current Trade Values</a>
    </div>
  </div>

  <p class="pfm-dt-disclosure">
   <a href="https://www.fantasypros.com/nfl/rankings/dynasty-rookies-overall.php"><strong>  FantasyPros Dynasty ECR </strong></a>is used as a consensus reference point, not as the basis for PFM&#8217;s rankings. PFM Dynasty rankings reflect Justin Fuhr&#8217;s current player order and tier decisions. Player news and camp context were reviewed through August 10, 2026.
  </p>

</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/10/2026-dynasty-trade-targets/">2026 Dynasty Trade Targets: 8 Players I&#8217;d Buy or Sell Before Week 1</a> appeared first on <a href="https://profootballmania.com">Pro Football Mania</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/10/2026-dynasty-trade-targets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">54376</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>3 High-Upside Fantasy Football Values I’m Targeting in 2026</title>
		<link>https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/06/high-upside-fantasy-football-values-2026/</link>
					<comments>https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/06/high-upside-fantasy-football-values-2026/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin Fuhr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 19:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Fantasy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://profootballmania.com/?p=54270</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Rachaad White, Romeo Doubs and T.J. Hockenson are three players I keep coming back to at their current price. There is risk with all three, but that risk is already built into the cost. Each has a realistic way to become more valuable than the round where they are being drafted. The price matters: A [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/06/high-upside-fantasy-football-values-2026/">3 High-Upside Fantasy Football Values I’m Targeting in 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://profootballmania.com">Pro Football Mania</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<style>
.pfm-fantasy-values,
.pfm-fantasy-values * {
  box-sizing: border-box;
}

.pfm-fantasy-values {
  --pfm-navy: #0b1f3a;
  --pfm-red: #b22025;
  --pfm-red-dark: #7a0d17;
  --pfm-gold: #d6a313;
  --pfm-ink: #172033;
  --pfm-muted: #5f6b7a;
  --pfm-border: #dfe4ea;
  --pfm-soft: #f7f8fa;
  color: var(--pfm-ink);
}

.pfm-fantasy-values p,
.pfm-fantasy-values li,
.pfm-fantasy-values td,
.pfm-fantasy-values th {
  font-size: 17px;
  line-height: 1.68;
}

.pfm-fantasy-values p {
  margin: 0 0 1.15em;
}

.pfm-fantasy-values h2 {
  margin: 2.15em 0 .65em;
  color: var(--pfm-navy);
  font-size: clamp(28px, 4vw, 38px);
  line-height: 1.12;
  letter-spacing: -.025em;
}

.pfm-fantasy-values h3 {
  margin: 1.45em 0 .5em;
  color: var(--pfm-navy);
  font-size: 24px;
  line-height: 1.2;
}

.pfm-fantasy-values a {
  color: var(--pfm-red);
  font-weight: 800;
  text-decoration-thickness: 2px;
  text-underline-offset: 3px;
}

.pfm-fantasy-lede {
  margin: 0 0 1.15em !important;
  color: #263247;
  font-size: clamp(20px, 2.5vw, 24px) !important;
  line-height: 1.55 !important;
  font-weight: 700;
}

.pfm-fantasy-note,
.pfm-fantasy-callout,
.pfm-fantasy-verdict,
.pfm-fantasy-featured {
  margin: 28px 0;
  padding: 22px 24px;
  border: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  border-left: 5px solid var(--pfm-red);
  border-radius: 12px;
  background: #fff;
  box-shadow: 0 8px 22px rgba(15, 23, 42, .06);
}

.pfm-fantasy-featured {
  border-left-color: var(--pfm-gold);
  background: linear-gradient(135deg, #fff 0%, #fffaf0 100%);
}

.pfm-fantasy-note strong,
.pfm-fantasy-callout strong,
.pfm-fantasy-verdict strong,
.pfm-fantasy-featured strong {
  color: var(--pfm-navy);
}

.pfm-fantasy-featured span {
  display: block;
  margin-bottom: 7px;
  color: var(--pfm-red);
  font-size: 12px;
  font-weight: 900;
  letter-spacing: .08em;
  text-transform: uppercase;
}

.pfm-table-wrap {
  width: 100%;
  margin: 28px 0 36px;
  overflow-x: auto;
  border: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  border-radius: 12px;
  background: #fff;
  box-shadow: 0 8px 22px rgba(15, 23, 42, .05);
}

.pfm-fantasy-table {
  width: 100%;
  min-width: 780px;
  border-collapse: collapse;
}

.pfm-fantasy-table caption {
  padding: 18px 20px;
  color: var(--pfm-navy);
  font-size: 20px;
  line-height: 1.3;
  font-weight: 900;
  text-align: left;
}

.pfm-fantasy-table th {
  padding: 13px 16px;
  background: var(--pfm-navy);
  color: #fff;
  font-size: 13px;
  line-height: 1.3;
  letter-spacing: .06em;
  text-align: left;
  text-transform: uppercase;
}

.pfm-fantasy-table td {
  padding: 14px 16px;
  border-top: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  vertical-align: top;
}

.pfm-fantasy-table tbody tr:nth-child(even) {
  background: var(--pfm-soft);
}

.pfm-player-card {
  margin: 28px 0 36px;
  overflow: hidden;
  border: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  border-radius: 14px;
  background: #fff;
  box-shadow: 0 10px 28px rgba(15, 23, 42, .06);
}

.pfm-player-card__head {
  display: grid;
  grid-template-columns: minmax(0, 1fr) auto;
  gap: 18px;
  align-items: center;
  padding: 20px 22px;
  border-top: 5px solid var(--pfm-red);
  background: var(--pfm-soft);
}

.pfm-player-card__identity {
  display: grid;
  grid-template-columns: 72px minmax(0, 1fr);
  gap: 15px;
  align-items: center;
  min-width: 0;
}

.pfm-player-card__logo {
  display: flex;
  width: 72px;
  height: 72px;
  align-items: center;
  justify-content: center;
  border: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  border-radius: 50%;
  background: #fff;
  box-shadow: 0 6px 16px rgba(15, 23, 42, .08);
}

.pfm-player-card__logo img {
  display: block !important;
  width: 54px !important;
  height: 54px !important;
  max-width: 54px !important;
  object-fit: contain !important;
}

.pfm-player-card__head span {
  display: block;
  margin-bottom: 5px;
  color: var(--pfm-muted);
  font-size: 12px;
  font-weight: 900;
  letter-spacing: .07em;
  text-transform: uppercase;
}

.pfm-player-card__head strong {
  display: block;
  color: var(--pfm-navy);
  font-size: clamp(24px, 3vw, 31px);
  line-height: 1.15;
}

.pfm-player-card__tag {
  min-width: 132px;
  padding: 10px 14px;
  border-radius: 999px;
  background: var(--pfm-navy);
  color: #fff;
  font-size: 13px;
  font-weight: 900;
  letter-spacing: .06em;
  text-align: center;
  text-transform: uppercase;
}

.pfm-player-card__body {
  padding: 22px;
}

.pfm-player-points {
  display: grid;
  grid-template-columns: repeat(3, minmax(0, 1fr));
  gap: 12px;
  margin: 20px 0 24px;
}

.pfm-player-points > div {
  padding: 16px;
  border: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  border-top: 4px solid var(--pfm-gold);
  border-radius: 10px;
  background: #fff;
}

.pfm-player-points span {
  display: block;
  margin-bottom: 5px;
  color: var(--pfm-muted);
  font-size: 12px;
  font-weight: 900;
  letter-spacing: .07em;
  text-transform: uppercase;
}

.pfm-player-points strong {
  display: block;
  color: var(--pfm-navy);
  font-size: 18px;
  line-height: 1.28;
}

.pfm-fantasy-values a.pfm-player-link,
.pfm-fantasy-values a.pfm-player-link:link,
.pfm-fantasy-values a.pfm-player-link:visited {
  display: inline-flex !important;
  width: auto !important;
  max-width: 100% !important;
  min-height: 42px !important;
  align-items: center !important;
  justify-content: center !important;
  margin-top: 3px !important;
  border: 1px solid var(--pfm-red) !important;
  border-radius: 999px !important;
  padding: 10px 16px !important;
  background: var(--pfm-red) !important;
  color: #fff !important;
  -webkit-text-fill-color: #fff !important;
  font-family: Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", Arial, sans-serif !important;
  font-size: 13px !important;
  line-height: 1.2 !important;
  font-weight: 900 !important;
  letter-spacing: 0 !important;
  text-align: center !important;
  text-decoration: none !important;
  text-transform: none !important;
  box-shadow: none !important;
  white-space: normal !important;
}

.pfm-fantasy-values a.pfm-player-link:hover,
.pfm-fantasy-values a.pfm-player-link:focus,
.pfm-fantasy-values a.pfm-player-link:active {
  border-color: var(--pfm-red-dark) !important;
  background: var(--pfm-red-dark) !important;
  color: #fff !important;
  -webkit-text-fill-color: #fff !important;
  text-decoration: none !important;
}

.pfm-fantasy-values a.pfm-player-link:focus-visible {
  outline: 3px solid var(--pfm-gold) !important;
  outline-offset: 3px !important;
}

.pfm-fantasy-verdict ul {
  margin: 14px 0 0;
  padding-left: 22px;
}

.pfm-fantasy-verdict li {
  margin-bottom: 8px;
}

@media (max-width: 760px) {
  .pfm-fantasy-values p,
  .pfm-fantasy-values li,
  .pfm-fantasy-values td,
  .pfm-fantasy-values th {
    font-size: 16px;
  }

  .pfm-player-card__head {
    grid-template-columns: 1fr;
  }

  .pfm-player-card__identity {
    grid-template-columns: 60px minmax(0, 1fr);
    gap: 12px;
  }

  .pfm-player-card__logo {
    width: 60px;
    height: 60px;
  }

  .pfm-player-card__logo img {
    width: 46px !important;
    height: 46px !important;
    max-width: 46px !important;
  }

  .pfm-fantasy-values a.pfm-player-link {
    width: 100% !important;
  }

  .pfm-player-card__tag {
    width: max-content;
    min-width: 0;
  }

  .pfm-player-points {
    grid-template-columns: 1fr;
  }

  .pfm-fantasy-note,
  .pfm-fantasy-callout,
  .pfm-fantasy-verdict,
  .pfm-fantasy-featured,
  .pfm-player-card__body {
    padding: 19px 18px;
  }
}
</style>
<article class="pfm-fantasy-values">
<p>Rachaad White, Romeo Doubs and T.J. Hockenson are three players I keep coming back to at their current price. There is risk with all three, but that risk is already built into the cost. Each has a realistic way to become more valuable than the round where they are being drafted.</p>


<div class="pfm-fantasy-note"><strong>The price matters:</strong> A value pick stops being a value once the price climbs too high. I like all three where they are going now, not several rounds earlier.</div>
<h2>Rachaad White Has the Best Path to a Bigger Role</h2>
<div class="pfm-player-card">
<div class="pfm-player-card__head">
<div class="pfm-player-card__identity"><div class="pfm-player-card__logo"><img loading="lazy" alt="Washington Commanders logo" decoding="async" height="54" loading="lazy" src="/images/teams/was.png" width="54"></div><div>
<span>Running Back Value</span>
<strong>Rachaad White, Washington Commanders</strong>
</div></div>
<div class="pfm-player-card__tag">Upside Bet</div>
</div>
<div class="pfm-player-card__body">
<p>White is the easiest of the three to buy into. Washington does not have a clear lead back, and White already has familiarity with Jayden Daniels. He does not need 20 carries every week to beat his current price.</p>
<p>White&#8217;s receiving ability gives him a chance to matter right away. Daniels can extend plays and attack downfield but he still needs an answer when pressure wins or the first read is covered. White can stay useful even if Washington never hands him the entire rushing load.</p>
<p>PFM ranks Washington No. 11 in QB Stability, which is a good setup for a back who can help in the passing game. Terry McLaurin and Stefon Diggs will pull coverage outside. White can find work underneath and around the goal line.</p>
<div aria-label="Rachaad White fantasy football case" class="pfm-player-points">
<div>
<span>Best Case</span>
<strong>Wins the lead role and keeps the passing-down work</strong>
</div>
<div>
<span>Useful Floor</span>
<strong>Receiving back with weekly flex value</strong>
</div>
<div>
<span>Main Risk</span>
<strong>Never separates from the rest of the backfield</strong>
</div>
</div>
<h3>Why I Prefer White to Cam Skattebo</h3>
<p>Skattebo may end up with more carries. I am still taking White at the cheaper price. Both players have role risk, but White is tied to Daniels and has a receiving role that can keep him productive even if he never owns the backfield.</p>
<p>White does not need to become a workhorse for the pick to hit. Give him enough early-down work to go with the passing-game role, and he can beat where he is being drafted.</p>
<a class="pfm-player-link" href="/nfl-team-dashboards/washington-commanders/">View the Commanders dashboard</a>
</div>
</div>
<h2>Romeo Doubs Does Not Have to Be New England&#8217;s No. 1</h2>
<div class="pfm-player-card">
<div class="pfm-player-card__head">
<div class="pfm-player-card__identity"><div class="pfm-player-card__logo"><img loading="lazy" alt="New England Patriots logo" decoding="async" height="54" loading="lazy" src="/images/teams/ne.png" width="54"></div><div>
<span>Wide Receiver Value</span>
<strong>Romeo Doubs, New England Patriots</strong>
</div></div>
<div class="pfm-player-card__tag">Big-Play Bet</div>
</div>
<div class="pfm-player-card__body">
<p>A.J. Brown will be the first name defenses worry about in New England. That can help Doubs. Drake Maye now has two outside receivers who can threaten a defense at different levels, and the coverage cannot lean toward both on every snap.</p>
<p>PFM ranks New England No. 4 in Explosiveness, and Doubs fits that offense. Maye is willing to push the ball downfield. Doubs can turn a smaller target share into meaningful fantasy production if the big plays and touchdowns are there.</p>
<p>I am not drafting Doubs because I expect him to out-target Brown. He does not need to. At this price, enough downfield work and red-zone chances can make him a strong bench receiver with a real shot to become more than that.</p>
<div aria-label="Romeo Doubs fantasy football case" class="pfm-player-points">
<div>
<span>Best Case</span>
<strong>Finishes close to Brown in yards and touchdowns</strong>
</div>
<div>
<span>Useful Floor</span>
<strong>Bench receiver with real spike-week potential</strong>
</div>
<div>
<span>Main Risk</span>
<strong>The target order leaves him too dependent on big plays</strong>
</div>
</div>
<h3>Why I Prefer Doubs to Mike Evans</h3>
<p>Evans still carries the bigger name and the higher draft cost, but he is already dealing with injuries. Doubs gives me a cheaper way into an ascending offense led by a young quarterback who wants to attack downfield.</p>
<p>Evans has had the better career. That is not the decision fantasy managers are making. The decision is whether to pay the higher 2026 price for Evans or take the cheaper shot on Doubs. I prefer Doubs.</p>
<a class="pfm-player-link" href="/nfl-team-dashboards/new-england-patriots/">View the Patriots dashboard</a>
</div>
</div>
<h2>T.J. Hockenson Is the Tight End Discount</h2>
<div class="pfm-player-card">
<div class="pfm-player-card__head">
<div class="pfm-player-card__identity"><div class="pfm-player-card__logo"><img loading="lazy" alt="Minnesota Vikings logo" decoding="async" height="54" loading="lazy" src="/images/teams/min.png" width="54"></div><div>
<span>Tight End Value</span>
<strong>T.J. Hockenson, Minnesota Vikings</strong>
</div></div>
<div class="pfm-player-card__tag">Volume Bet</div>
</div>
<div class="pfm-player-card__body">
<p>Tight ends get expensive quickly once fantasy managers start paying for a familiar name. Hockenson gives me a cheaper option with a real route to targets.</p>
<p>Kyler Murray is the current leader in Minnesota&#8217;s quarterback competition. In 2025, 47.4% of his targets went to tight ends, with Trey McBride handling most of that work. Hockenson does not need that same volume. He needs Murray to keep looking inside when Justin Jefferson pulls coverage outside.</p>
<p>Kevin O&#8217;Connell is another reason I am willing to take the chance. PFM ranks Minnesota No. 13 in Coaching Direction but No. 24 in both QB Stability and offense. I am not betting on the Vikings becoming a great offense. I am betting Hockenson can be a bigger part of a shaky one.</p>
<div aria-label="T.J. Hockenson fantasy football case" class="pfm-player-points">
<div>
<span>Best Case</span>
<strong>Becomes Murray&#8217;s main target between the numbers</strong>
</div>
<div>
<span>Useful Floor</span>
<strong>Low-cost starter with steady target weeks</strong>
</div>
<div>
<span>Main Risk</span>
<strong>The quarterback competition keeps the passing game uneven</strong>
</div>
</div>
<h3>Why I Prefer Hockenson to Travis Kelce</h3>
<p>Kelce can still help a fantasy team, but I cannot justify paying the current price for the name. Hockenson gives me a cheaper path to targets without forcing the rest of the draft around an early tight end pick.</p>
<p>Waiting at tight end only works when the later option has a real route to volume. Hockenson has one. Murray&#8217;s history with tight ends, Jefferson&#8217;s coverage pull and O&#8217;Connell&#8217;s offense give me enough reason to make the bet.</p>
<a class="pfm-player-link" href="/nfl-team-dashboards/minnesota-vikings/">View the Vikings dashboard</a>
</div>
</div>
<div class="pfm-fantasy-featured">
<span>Featured Expert Picks</span>
<strong>FantasyPros included all three selections in its 2026 high-upside player roundup.</strong>
<p>FantasyPros asked featured experts to name one running back, wide receiver and tight end with the best upside at current half-PPR ADP. These were my three choices. <a href="https://www.fantasypros.com/2026/08/high-upside-fantasy-football-players-by-adp-2026/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Read the complete FantasyPros expert roundup</a>.</p>
</div>
<h2>What Are the Downsides to These Picks?</h2>
<p>Every value pick has a flipside. White misses if Washington names another back the clear early-down and goal-line option. Doubs misses if he settles well behind Brown and another receiver in the target order. Hockenson misses if Murray does not win the job or Minnesota&#8217;s tight ends remain a small part of the passing game.</p>
<p>That is why I am not reaching for any of them. The upside comes from taking on some uncertainty at a discount. Once the discount disappears, so does the value.</p>
<div class="pfm-fantasy-verdict">
<strong>How I would handle all three:</strong>
<ul>
<li>Draft White as running back depth with a real path to flex value.</li>
<li>Draft Doubs as a bench receiver who can become a weekly matchup play.</li>
<li>Draft Hockenson as a discounted starter or a strong option when waiting at tight end.</li>
<li>Do not move any of them several rounds above ADP just because the upside case is appealing.</li>
<li>Re-check roles and injuries before the final week of drafts.</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="pfm-fantasy-callout">
<strong>Build your draft board:</strong>
    Compare these picks with the latest <a href="/fantasy-football-rankings/">2026 PFM Fantasy Football Rankings</a>.
  </div>
<p>
    Which value do you trust most: Rachaad White, Romeo Doubs or T.J. Hockenson?
  </p>
</article>
<p>The post <a href="https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/06/high-upside-fantasy-football-values-2026/">3 High-Upside Fantasy Football Values I’m Targeting in 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://profootballmania.com">Pro Football Mania</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/06/high-upside-fantasy-football-values-2026/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">54270</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Stefon Diggs to the Commanders Makes Sense</title>
		<link>https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/06/why-stefon-diggs-to-the-commanders-makes-sense/</link>
					<comments>https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/06/why-stefon-diggs-to-the-commanders-makes-sense/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Fuhr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 14:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://profootballmania.com/?p=54260</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Stefon Diggs has agreed to terms with the Washington Commanders, the 32-year old from the Maryland area is back, and feels like he still has a lot to offer. Let&#8217;s not forget he was on a Super Bowl team last year and had over 1,000 receiving yards. Now, he was the #1 receiver but that&#8217;s [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/06/why-stefon-diggs-to-the-commanders-makes-sense/">Why Stefon Diggs to the Commanders Makes Sense</a> appeared first on <a href="https://profootballmania.com">Pro Football Mania</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Stefon Diggs has agreed to terms with the <a href="https://profootballmania.com/nfl-team-dashboards/washington-commanders/">Washington Commanders</a>, the 32-year old from the Maryland area is back, and feels like he still has a lot to offer.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Let&#8217;s not forget he was on a Super Bowl team last year and had over 1,000 receiving yards. Now, he was the #1 receiver but that&#8217;s impressive that he&#8217;s still producing after over a decade in the league. Let&#8217;s face it, the Commanders needed another receiver. Aside from Terry McLaurin last year, Jaylin Lane was the leading receiver with a whopping 235 yards. That&#8217;s just not going to cut it when your in the NFC East where offenses are producing at a high level. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Commanders needed depth, and they got that with Stefon and aside from depth leadership and experience. There has been rumors that he could be a cancer, but lately the rumor is he&#8217;s a great teammate in the locker room. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It&#8217;s got to be appealing to Stefon, that he gets to play with Jayden Daniels, who has been having a stellar camp so far. The word is his ball accuracy is on point which is pleasant news for all the receivers. In watching Stefon&#8217;s highlights last year, he appears that he&#8217;s not as explosive as he was, but his route running is still very good and his ability to change direction and speeds is still top notch. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The interesting thing to watch this year will be the dynamic between him and Terry McLaurin. What will the target share be like when you have two prolific receivers. I expect them to feed off each other and work well together in this offense. Also with having more threats at receiver, we should see a solid running game to include Jayden Daniels. There is a lot to like about this acquisition, and we will see if the Commanders can get back on top of the NFC East.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/06/why-stefon-diggs-to-the-commanders-makes-sense/">Why Stefon Diggs to the Commanders Makes Sense</a> appeared first on <a href="https://profootballmania.com">Pro Football Mania</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/06/why-stefon-diggs-to-the-commanders-makes-sense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">54260</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Middle of the NFL Is Wide Open in the 2026 Power Rankings</title>
		<link>https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/05/nfl-power-rankings-wide-open-middle/</link>
					<comments>https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/05/nfl-power-rankings-wide-open-middle/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin Fuhr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 17:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PFM Ratings]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://profootballmania.com/?p=54237</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The top of the NFL is easier to rank. So is the bottom. The middle is where six national power rankings stop agreeing. One of the reasons we wanted to implement the consensus power rankings page was to drill down exactly how all major sources see teams differently. Teams ranked No. 9 through No. 24 [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/05/nfl-power-rankings-wide-open-middle/">The Middle of the NFL Is Wide Open in the 2026 Power Rankings</a> appeared first on <a href="https://profootballmania.com">Pro Football Mania</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<style>
.pfm-middle-study,
.pfm-middle-study * {
  box-sizing: border-box;
}

.pfm-middle-study {
  --pfm-navy: #0b1f3a;
  --pfm-red: #b22025;
  --pfm-gold: #d6a313;
  --pfm-ink: #172033;
  --pfm-muted: #5f6b7a;
  --pfm-border: #dfe4ea;
  --pfm-soft: #f7f8fa;
  color: var(--pfm-ink);
}

.pfm-middle-study p,
.pfm-middle-study li,
.pfm-middle-study td,
.pfm-middle-study th {
  font-size: 17px;
  line-height: 1.68;
}

.pfm-middle-study p {
  margin: 0 0 1.15em;
}

.pfm-middle-study h2 {
  margin: 2.2em 0 .65em;
  color: var(--pfm-navy);
  font-size: clamp(28px, 4vw, 38px);
  line-height: 1.12;
  letter-spacing: -.025em;
}

.pfm-middle-study h3 {
  margin: 1.55em 0 .5em;
  color: var(--pfm-navy);
  font-size: 24px;
  line-height: 1.2;
}

.pfm-middle-study a {
  color: var(--pfm-red);
  font-weight: 800;
  text-decoration-thickness: 2px;
  text-underline-offset: 3px;
}

.pfm-middle-lede {
  margin: 0 0 1.2em !important;
  color: #263247;
  font-size: clamp(20px, 2.5vw, 24px) !important;
  line-height: 1.55 !important;
  font-weight: 700;
}

.pfm-middle-note,
.pfm-middle-callout,
.pfm-middle-verdict {
  margin: 28px 0;
  padding: 22px 24px;
  border: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  border-left: 5px solid var(--pfm-red);
  border-radius: 12px;
  background: #fff;
  box-shadow: 0 8px 22px rgba(15, 23, 42, .06);
}

.pfm-middle-note strong,
.pfm-middle-callout strong,
.pfm-middle-verdict strong {
  color: var(--pfm-navy);
}

.pfm-range-cards {
  display: grid;
  grid-template-columns: repeat(3, minmax(0, 1fr));
  gap: 14px;
  margin: 28px 0 32px;
}

.pfm-range-card {
  padding: 20px;
  border: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  border-top: 5px solid var(--pfm-red);
  border-radius: 12px;
  background: #fff;
  box-shadow: 0 8px 22px rgba(15, 23, 42, .05);
}

.pfm-range-card--middle {
  border-top-color: var(--pfm-gold);
}

.pfm-range-card span {
  display: block;
  margin-bottom: 7px;
  color: var(--pfm-muted);
  font-size: 12px;
  font-weight: 900;
  letter-spacing: .07em;
  text-transform: uppercase;
}

.pfm-range-card strong {
  display: block;
  color: var(--pfm-navy);
  font-size: 31px;
  line-height: 1.05;
}

.pfm-range-card small {
  display: block;
  margin-top: 7px;
  color: var(--pfm-muted);
  font-size: 14px;
  line-height: 1.4;
}

.pfm-table-wrap {
  width: 100%;
  margin: 28px 0 36px;
  overflow-x: auto;
  border: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  border-radius: 12px;
  background: #fff;
  box-shadow: 0 8px 22px rgba(15, 23, 42, .05);
}

.pfm-middle-table {
  width: 100%;
  min-width: 720px;
  border-collapse: collapse;
}

.pfm-middle-table caption {
  padding: 18px 20px;
  color: var(--pfm-navy);
  font-size: 20px;
  line-height: 1.3;
  font-weight: 900;
  text-align: left;
}

.pfm-middle-table th {
  padding: 13px 16px;
  background: var(--pfm-navy);
  color: #fff;
  font-size: 13px;
  line-height: 1.3;
  letter-spacing: .06em;
  text-align: left;
  text-transform: uppercase;
}

.pfm-middle-table td {
  padding: 14px 16px;
  border-top: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  vertical-align: top;
}

.pfm-middle-table tbody tr:nth-child(even) {
  background: var(--pfm-soft);
}

.pfm-team-points {
  display: grid;
  grid-template-columns: repeat(3, minmax(0, 1fr));
  gap: 12px;
  margin: 20px 0 24px;
}

.pfm-team-points > div {
  padding: 16px;
  border: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  border-top: 4px solid var(--pfm-red);
  border-radius: 10px;
  background: #fff;
}

.pfm-team-points span {
  display: block;
  margin-bottom: 5px;
  color: var(--pfm-muted);
  font-size: 12px;
  font-weight: 900;
  letter-spacing: .07em;
  text-transform: uppercase;
}

.pfm-team-points strong {
  display: block;
  color: var(--pfm-navy);
  font-size: 20px;
  line-height: 1.2;
}

.pfm-inline-link {
  display: inline-flex;
  align-items: center;
  gap: 8px;
  margin-top: 3px;
  font-size: 14px;
  letter-spacing: .04em;
  text-transform: uppercase;
}

.pfm-inline-link::after {
  content: "\2192";
  display: inline-block;
  line-height: 1;
}

.pfm-middle-verdict ul {
  margin: 14px 0 0;
  padding-left: 22px;
}

.pfm-middle-verdict li {
  margin-bottom: 8px;
}

@media (max-width: 760px) {
  .pfm-middle-study p,
  .pfm-middle-study li,
  .pfm-middle-study td,
  .pfm-middle-study th {
    font-size: 16px;
  }

  .pfm-range-cards,
  .pfm-team-points {
    grid-template-columns: 1fr;
  }

  .pfm-middle-note,
  .pfm-middle-callout,
  .pfm-middle-verdict {
    padding: 19px 18px;
  }
}
</style>

<article class="pfm-middle-study">
  <p class="pfm-middle-lede">
    The top of the NFL is easier to rank. So is the bottom. The middle is where six national power rankings stop agreeing.
  </p>

  <p>
    One of the reasons we wanted to implement the consensus power rankings page was to drill down exactly how all major sources see teams differently. Teams ranked No. 9 through No. 24 in the current <a href="/nfl-consensus-power-rankings/">PFM NFL consensus power rankings</a> are separated by an average range of eight spots. The top eight average 5.5 spots. The bottom eight average just 3.8.
  </p>

  <p>
    That is a big difference. Eleven of the 16 teams in the middle have a range of at least eight spots, and five stretch across 10 or more. One outlet can see a playoff threat while another sees the same team fighting to stay out of the bottom half.
  </p>

  <div class="pfm-middle-note">
    <strong>About the snapshot:</strong>
    The consensus uses six complete national rankings published from April 26 through July 28. This is an offseason baseline, not a claim that every outlet changed its mind this week. PFM ratings were updated August 4.
  </div>

  <div class="pfm-range-cards" aria-label="Average ranking range by section of the consensus">
    <div class="pfm-range-card">
      <span>Consensus No. 1-8</span>
      <strong>5.5 spots</strong>
      <small>Average range across the top eight teams</small>
    </div>
    <div class="pfm-range-card pfm-range-card--middle">
      <span>Consensus No. 9-24</span>
      <strong>8.0 spots</strong>
      <small>Average range across the middle 16 teams</small>
    </div>
    <div class="pfm-range-card">
      <span>Consensus No. 25-32</span>
      <strong>3.8 spots</strong>
      <small>Average range across the bottom eight teams</small>
    </div>
  </div>

  <div class="pfm-table-wrap" role="region" aria-label="Ranking agreement by section of the 2026 NFL consensus" tabindex="0">
    <table class="pfm-middle-table">
      <caption>Where the six national power rankings agree and disagree</caption>
      <thead>
        <tr>
          <th scope="col">Part of the Rankings</th>
          <th scope="col">Teams</th>
          <th scope="col">Average Range</th>
          <th scope="col">Median Range</th>
          <th scope="col">What It Means</th>
        </tr>
      </thead>
      <tbody>
        <tr>
          <td>Top eight</td>
          <td>No. 1-8</td>
          <td>5.5 spots</td>
          <td>5 spots</td>
          <td>The contender group is easier to identify.</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <td>Middle 16</td>
          <td>No. 9-24</td>
          <td>8.0 spots</td>
          <td>9 spots</td>
          <td>This is where the rankings pull apart.</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <td>Bottom eight</td>
          <td>No. 25-32</td>
          <td>3.8 spots</td>
          <td>4 spots</td>
          <td>The lowest group is more settled than the middle.</td>
        </tr>
      </tbody>
    </table>
  </div>

  <h2>The Middle Is Not One Big Tier</h2>

  <p>
    Calling every team from No. 9 through No. 24 part of the same tier would miss the point. Some are balanced playoff teams. Some have a quarterback or one side of the ball strong enough to carry a flawed roster. Others need almost everything to go right.
  </p>

  <p>
    That is why the average rank alone does not settle the argument. Houston and Jacksonville both received a top-five placement and a No. 15 placement. Kansas City sits No. 13 in the consensus but No. 3 in PFM. Dallas can be found as high as No. 8 and as low as No. 20.
  </p>

  <div class="pfm-table-wrap" role="region" aria-label="Selected teams from the middle of the 2026 NFL power rankings" tabindex="0">
    <table class="pfm-middle-table">
      <caption>Five teams that explain why the middle is wide open</caption>
      <thead>
        <tr>
          <th scope="col">Team</th>
          <th scope="col">Consensus</th>
          <th scope="col">National Range</th>
          <th scope="col">PFM Rank</th>
          <th scope="col">Main Question</th>
        </tr>
      </thead>
      <tbody>
        <tr>
          <td>Houston Texans</td>
          <td>No. 10</td>
          <td>No. 5 to No. 15</td>
          <td>No. 10</td>
          <td>Can the offense give the defense enough help?</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <td>Jacksonville Jaguars</td>
          <td>No. 11</td>
          <td>No. 5 to No. 15</td>
          <td>No. 14</td>
          <td>Can the protection and passing game stay on schedule?</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <td>Kansas City Chiefs</td>
          <td>No. 13</td>
          <td>No. 8 to No. 17</td>
          <td>No. 3</td>
          <td>How much should Mahomes and Reid outweigh recent concerns?</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <td>Cincinnati Bengals</td>
          <td>No. 16</td>
          <td>No. 10 to No. 21</td>
          <td>No. 16</td>
          <td>Can Joe Burrow carry another weak defense?</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <td>Dallas Cowboys</td>
          <td>No. 17</td>
          <td>No. 8 to No. 20</td>
          <td>No. 21</td>
          <td>Is the offense strong enough to cover the defense and coaching?</td>
        </tr>
      </tbody>
    </table>
  </div>

  <h2>Dallas Is a Great Example</h2>

  <p>
    No team has a wider range than Dallas. One outlet placed the Cowboys at No. 8. Another dropped them to No. 20. The consensus lands at No. 17, while PFM has Dallas at No. 21.
  </p>

  <p>
    Both sides of the argument are easy to see. Dak Prescott and CeeDee Lamb lead an offense that ranks No. 5 in PFM. That can look like a top-10 team when the protection holds and the passing game controls the matchup.
  </p>

  <p>
    The rest of the team pulls the ranking back down. Dallas is No. 28 on defense and No. 22 in Coaching Direction. The Cowboys have enough offense to scare anyone, but they also have a clear way to lose when the defense cannot get off the field or the game moves away from the preferred script.
  </p>

  <div class="pfm-team-points" aria-label="Dallas Cowboys ranking snapshot">
    <div>
      <span>National Range</span>
      <strong>No. 8 to No. 20</strong>
    </div>
    <div>
      <span>Consensus Rank</span>
      <strong>No. 17</strong>
    </div>
    <div>
      <span>PFM Rank</span>
      <strong>No. 21</strong>
    </div>
  </div>

  <a class="pfm-inline-link" href="/nfl-team-dashboards/dallas-cowboys/">View the Dallas Cowboys dashboard</a>

  <h2>Houston and Jacksonville Have Two Different Paths</h2>

  <p>
    The AFC South gives us two teams with the exact same national range. Houston and Jacksonville were both ranked as high as No. 5 and as low as No. 15.
  </p>

  <p>
    Houston&#8217;s profile starts with the defense. Will Anderson Jr. and Danielle Hunter give the Texans a front that can create pressure without forcing DeMeco Ryans to sell out the coverage. PFM ranks the defense No. 3, but the offense sits No. 19. C.J. Stroud still has to overcome protection problems and an attack that does not create enough easy explosive plays.
  </p>

  <p>
    Jacksonville is built differently. The Jaguars do not have Houston&#8217;s defensive edge, but they also do not carry one weakness as extreme as Houston&#8217;s offense. Trevor Lawrence, Brian Thomas Jr. and Josh Hines-Allen give Liam Coen enough high-end talent to win. The problem is consistency. Dropped passes and protection leaks can still break the timing of the entire offense.
  </p>

  <p>
    PFM has Houston No. 10 and Jacksonville No. 14. The national rankings are less settled because each team has a real playoff case and a real way for the season to get away from it.
  </p>

  <a class="pfm-inline-link" href="/nfl-team-dashboards/houston-texans/">View the Houston Texans dashboard</a><br>
  <a class="pfm-inline-link" href="/nfl-team-dashboards/jacksonville-jaguars/">View the Jacksonville Jaguars dashboard</a>

  <h2>PFM Sees Two Contenders Hiding in the Middle</h2>

  <p>
    Kansas City and Detroit create the biggest challenge to the national order. The Chiefs are No. 13 in the consensus and the Lions are No. 15. PFM has them No. 3 and No. 4.
  </p>

  <p>
    Kansas City&#8217;s case is simple. Patrick Mahomes and Andy Reid still give the Chiefs answers on late downs that most teams do not have. PFM ranks Coaching Direction No. 1, Roster Strength No. 4 and the defense No. 8. The concern is recent performance and whether the offensive line gives Mahomes the time and movement he needs.
  </p>

  <p>
    Detroit&#8217;s profile starts with an offense that ranks No. 2. Jahmyr Gibbs and the offensive line let Jared Goff work from play action instead of obvious passing downs. The Lions also rank No. 3 in Roster Strength and No. 4 in Coaching Direction. The defense at No. 16 is the reason to not get too excited about the Lions prospects.
  </p>

  <p>
    The consensus is less willing to trust those strengths. PFM is. That does not prove PFM is right, but it shows why the middle is more than a group of average teams. Two of them still have championship-level traits.
  </p>

  <a class="pfm-inline-link" href="/nfl-team-dashboards/kansas-city-chiefs/">View the Kansas City Chiefs dashboard</a><br>
  <a class="pfm-inline-link" href="/nfl-team-dashboards/detroit-lions/">View the Detroit Lions dashboard</a>

  <h2>Cincinnati Shows Why One Great Quarterback Is Not Enough</h2>

  <p>
    The Bengals land at No. 16 in both the consensus and PFM, but that agreement hides one of the widest ranges in the study. Cincinnati was ranked anywhere from No. 10 to No. 21.
  </p>

  <p>
    Joe Burrow and the Bengals quarterback room give the Bengals PFM&#8217;s No. 1 QB Stability grade. Ja&#8217;Marr Chase gives Burrow a receiver who can change the coverage before the snap. That is the top-10 argument.
  </p>

  <p>
    The defense is once again the issue. Cincinnati ranks No. 29 on that side of the ball and No. 24 in Recent Performance. Burrow can win a shootout. The Bengals are still too dependent on him creating one.
  </p>

  <p>
    That is the middle of the league in one team. The ceiling is obvious. So is the weakness that can keep the ceiling from mattering.
  </p>

  <a class="pfm-inline-link" href="/nfl-team-dashboards/cincinnati-bengals/">View the Cincinnati Bengals dashboard</a>

  <h2>The Bottom Is More Settled Than the Middle</h2>

  <p>
    The bottom eight teams have an average range of only 3.8 spots. That does not mean every outlet agrees on the exact order. It means there is much less debate about which teams belong in that group.
  </p>

  <p>
    That is what makes the middle so important. The teams from No. 9 through No. 24 are not separated by one clean line. They are separated by which strength an outlet trusts, which weakness it believes can be covered and how much weight it gives the quarterback.
  </p>

  <div class="pfm-middle-verdict">
    <strong>What the current rankings say:</strong>
    <ul>
      <li>The top and bottom of the league are easier to identify than the middle.</li>
      <li>Eleven of the middle 16 teams have an eight-spot range or wider.</li>
      <li>Dallas has the widest split, but Cincinnati, Houston and Jacksonville are not far behind.</li>
      <li>Kansas City and Detroit show how a consensus middle team can still carry top-five traits.</li>
      <li>The first regular-season games should move this part of the rankings faster than either end.</li>
    </ul>
  </div>

  <p>
    Which team in the middle belongs closest to the top 10: Kansas City, Detroit, Houston, Jacksonville, Cincinnati or Dallas?
  </p>

  <div class="pfm-middle-callout">
    <strong>See the full picture:</strong>
    View the complete <a href="/nfl-consensus-power-rankings/">2026 NFL Consensus Power Rankings</a> and compare them with the latest <a href="/nfl-team-rankings/">PFM NFL Power Rankings</a>.
  </div>
</article>
<p>The post <a href="https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/05/nfl-power-rankings-wide-open-middle/">The Middle of the NFL Is Wide Open in the 2026 Power Rankings</a> appeared first on <a href="https://profootballmania.com">Pro Football Mania</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://profootballmania.com/2026/08/05/nfl-power-rankings-wide-open-middle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">54237</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>2026 NFL Training Camp: 5 Teams That Could Move Most in the PFM Rankings</title>
		<link>https://profootballmania.com/2026/07/28/2026-nfl-training-camp-teams-to-watch-pfm-rankings/</link>
					<comments>https://profootballmania.com/2026/07/28/2026-nfl-training-camp-teams-to-watch-pfm-rankings/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin Fuhr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 17:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PFM Ratings]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://profootballmania.com/?p=53676</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>PFM Training Camp Watch Training camp creates a lot of noise. One great practice does not change how we see a team. A major injury, a real quarterback change or a starting job that changes the shape of a roster absolutely can. That is why these five teams are worth watching closely. The PFM NFL [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://profootballmania.com/2026/07/28/2026-nfl-training-camp-teams-to-watch-pfm-rankings/">2026 NFL Training Camp: 5 Teams That Could Move Most in the PFM Rankings</a> appeared first on <a href="https://profootballmania.com">Pro Football Mania</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<style>
.pfm-training-camp-notebook,
.pfm-training-camp-notebook * {
  box-sizing: border-box;
}

.pfm-training-camp-notebook {
  --pfm-navy: #071b33;
  --pfm-red: #8b0f1a;
  --pfm-red-dark: #6f0c15;
  --pfm-gold: #d6a313;
  --pfm-ink: #101724;
  --pfm-copy: #354056;
  --pfm-muted: #64748b;
  --pfm-border: #dfe4ec;
  --pfm-soft: #f8fafc;
  color: var(--pfm-ink);
  font-family: Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", Arial, sans-serif;
}

.pfm-training-camp-notebook p,
.pfm-training-camp-notebook li,
.pfm-training-camp-notebook td,
.pfm-training-camp-notebook th {
  font-size: 17px;
  line-height: 1.68;
}

.pfm-training-camp-notebook p {
  margin: 0 0 1.15em;
  color: var(--pfm-copy);
}

.pfm-training-camp-notebook h2 {
  margin: 2.2em 0 .65em;
  color: var(--pfm-navy);
  font-size: clamp(28px, 4vw, 38px);
  line-height: 1.1;
  font-weight: 950;
  letter-spacing: -.035em;
  text-transform: none;
}

.pfm-training-camp-notebook h3 {
  margin: 1.45em 0 .5em;
  color: var(--pfm-navy);
  font-size: 22px;
  line-height: 1.2;
  font-weight: 900;
}

.pfm-training-camp-notebook a {
  color: var(--pfm-red);
  font-weight: 850;
  text-decoration-thickness: 2px;
  text-underline-offset: 3px;
}

.pfm-training-camp-notebook a:hover,
.pfm-training-camp-notebook a:focus-visible {
  color: var(--pfm-red-dark);
}

.pfm-training-camp-notebook a:focus-visible {
  outline: 3px solid var(--pfm-gold);
  outline-offset: 3px;
}

.pfm-camp-lede {
  margin: 0 0 1.15em !important;
  color: var(--pfm-navy) !important;
  font-size: clamp(20px, 2.5vw, 24px) !important;
  line-height: 1.55 !important;
  font-weight: 800 !important;
}

.pfm-camp-kicker {
  display: inline-block;
  margin: 4px 0 12px;
  color: var(--pfm-red);
  font-size: 12px;
  line-height: 1.3;
  font-weight: 950;
  letter-spacing: .1em;
  text-transform: uppercase;
}


.pfm-camp-team-tag {
  display: flex !important;
  align-items: center !important;
  gap: 10px !important;
  width: max-content !important;
  max-width: 100% !important;
  clear: both !important;
  margin: 0 0 12px !important;
  padding: 7px 12px !important;
  border: 1px solid var(--pfm-border) !important;
  border-radius: 999px !important;
  background: #fff !important;
  color: var(--pfm-navy) !important;
  font-size: 12px !important;
  line-height: 1.2 !important;
  font-weight: 900 !important;
  letter-spacing: .05em !important;
  text-transform: uppercase !important;
}

.pfm-camp-team-link + .pfm-camp-team-tag {
  margin-top: 64px !important;
}

.pfm-camp-team-tag + h2 {
  margin-top: 0 !important;
}

.pfm-camp-team-tag img {
  width: 26px;
  height: 26px;
  object-fit: contain;
  flex: 0 0 26px;
}

.pfm-camp-team-name {
  display: inline-flex;
  align-items: center;
  gap: 10px;
  font-weight: 900;
}

.pfm-camp-team-name img {
  width: 24px;
  height: 24px;
  object-fit: contain;
  vertical-align: middle;
  flex: 0 0 24px;
}

.pfm-camp-related,
.pfm-camp-callout,
.pfm-camp-final,
.pfm-camp-method {
  margin: 28px 0;
  padding: 22px 24px;
  border: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  border-left: 5px solid var(--pfm-red);
  border-radius: 14px;
  background: #fff;
  box-shadow: 0 8px 22px rgba(15, 23, 42, .055);
}

.pfm-camp-method {
  border-left-color: var(--pfm-gold);
  background: linear-gradient(145deg, #fff 0%, #fffdf6 100%);
}

.pfm-camp-related strong,
.pfm-camp-callout strong,
.pfm-camp-final strong,
.pfm-camp-method strong {
  color: var(--pfm-navy);
}

.pfm-camp-table-wrap {
  width: 100%;
  margin: 28px 0 38px;
  overflow-x: auto;
  overscroll-behavior-inline: contain;
  border: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  border-radius: 14px;
  background: #fff;
  box-shadow: 0 8px 22px rgba(15, 23, 42, .05);
}

.pfm-camp-table {
  width: 100%;
  min-width: 780px;
  margin: 0;
  border-collapse: collapse;
  background: #fff;
}

.pfm-camp-table caption {
  padding: 18px 20px;
  color: var(--pfm-navy);
  font-size: 20px;
  line-height: 1.3;
  font-weight: 950;
  text-align: left;
}

.pfm-camp-table th {
  padding: 13px 16px;
  border: 0;
  background: var(--pfm-navy);
  color: #fff;
  font-size: 12px;
  line-height: 1.35;
  font-weight: 900;
  letter-spacing: .06em;
  text-align: left;
  text-transform: uppercase;
}

.pfm-camp-table td {
  padding: 14px 16px;
  border: 0;
  border-top: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  color: var(--pfm-copy);
  vertical-align: top;
}

.pfm-camp-table tbody tr:nth-child(even) {
  background: var(--pfm-soft);
}

.pfm-camp-team-snapshot {
  display: grid;
  grid-template-columns: repeat(3, minmax(0, 1fr));
  gap: 12px;
  margin: 20px 0 24px;
}

.pfm-camp-team-snapshot > div {
  min-width: 0;
  padding: 16px;
  border: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  border-top: 4px solid var(--pfm-red);
  border-radius: 11px;
  background: var(--pfm-soft);
}

.pfm-camp-team-snapshot span {
  display: block;
  margin-bottom: 5px;
  color: var(--pfm-muted);
  font-size: 11px;
  line-height: 1.35;
  font-weight: 900;
  letter-spacing: .07em;
  text-transform: uppercase;
}

.pfm-camp-team-snapshot strong {
  display: block;
  color: var(--pfm-navy);
  font-size: 20px;
  line-height: 1.2;
  font-weight: 950;
  overflow-wrap: anywhere;
}

.pfm-camp-trigger {
  margin: 22px 0 8px;
  padding: 17px 19px;
  border: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  border-left: 4px solid var(--pfm-gold);
  border-radius: 0 11px 11px 0;
  background: #fffdf6;
}

.pfm-camp-trigger span {
  display: block;
  margin-bottom: 5px;
  color: #806318;
  font-size: 11px;
  line-height: 1.35;
  font-weight: 950;
  letter-spacing: .07em;
  text-transform: uppercase;
}

.pfm-camp-trigger p {
  margin: 0 !important;
  color: var(--pfm-copy) !important;
  font-size: 15px !important;
  line-height: 1.62 !important;
}

.pfm-training-camp-notebook a.pfm-camp-team-link {
  display: inline-flex;
  align-items: center;
  justify-content: center;
  gap: 8px;
  min-height: 48px;
  margin-top: 12px;
  padding: 12px 18px;
  border: 1px solid var(--pfm-red) !important;
  border-radius: 999px;
  background: var(--pfm-red) !important;
  color: #fff !important;
  font-size: 13px;
  line-height: 1.2;
  font-weight: 900 !important;
  letter-spacing: .03em;
  text-decoration: none !important;
  text-transform: uppercase;
  box-shadow: 0 8px 18px rgba(139, 15, 26, .18);
}

.pfm-training-camp-notebook a.pfm-camp-team-link:hover,
.pfm-training-camp-notebook a.pfm-camp-team-link:focus-visible {
  background: var(--pfm-red-dark) !important;
  border-color: var(--pfm-red-dark) !important;
  color: #fff !important;
}

.pfm-camp-change-grid {
  display: grid;
  grid-template-columns: repeat(2, minmax(0, 1fr));
  gap: 14px;
  margin-top: 18px;
}

.pfm-camp-change-card {
  min-width: 0;
  padding: 19px;
  border: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  border-top: 4px solid var(--pfm-red);
  border-radius: 11px;
  background: #fff;
}

.pfm-camp-change-card.is-noise {
  border-top-color: var(--pfm-gold);
}

.pfm-camp-change-card h3 {
  margin: 0 0 10px !important;
  font-size: 19px !important;
}

.pfm-camp-change-card ul {
  margin: 0;
  padding-left: 20px;
}

.pfm-camp-change-card li {
  margin: 0 0 7px;
  color: var(--pfm-copy);
  font-size: 15px;
  line-height: 1.55;
}

.pfm-camp-change-card li:last-child {
  margin-bottom: 0;
}

.pfm-camp-source-review {
  margin: 34px 0 0;
  border: 1px solid var(--pfm-border);
  border-radius: 12px;
  background: var(--pfm-soft);
  overflow: hidden;
}

.pfm-camp-source-review summary {
  min-height: 48px;
  padding: 14px 17px;
  color: var(--pfm-navy);
  font-size: 14px;
  line-height: 1.35;
  font-weight: 900;
  cursor: pointer;
}

.pfm-camp-source-review > div {
  padding: 0 17px 17px;
}

.pfm-camp-source-review p,
.pfm-camp-source-review li {
  font-size: 14px !important;
  line-height: 1.55 !important;
}

.pfm-camp-source-review ul {
  margin: 10px 0 0;
  padding-left: 20px;
}

.pfm-camp-freshness {
  margin: 18px 0 0 !important;
  color: var(--pfm-muted) !important;
  font-size: 13px !important;
  line-height: 1.55 !important;
}

@media (max-width: 760px) {
  .pfm-training-camp-notebook p,
  .pfm-training-camp-notebook li,
  .pfm-training-camp-notebook td,
  .pfm-training-camp-notebook th {
    font-size: 16px;
  }

  .pfm-camp-team-snapshot,
  .pfm-camp-change-grid {
    grid-template-columns: 1fr;
  }

  .pfm-camp-related,
  .pfm-camp-callout,
  .pfm-camp-final,
  .pfm-camp-method {
    padding: 19px 18px;
    border-radius: 12px;
  }

  .pfm-camp-team-link {
    width: 100%;
  }

  .pfm-camp-team-link + .pfm-camp-team-tag {
    margin-top: 48px !important;
  }
}

@media (max-width: 420px) {
  .pfm-camp-table-wrap {
    margin-inline: 0;
  }

  .pfm-camp-team-snapshot > div,
  .pfm-camp-change-card {
    padding: 15px;
  }
}

@media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) {
  .pfm-training-camp-notebook * {
    scroll-behavior: auto !important;
    transition: none !important;
    animation: none !important;
  }
}
</style>

<article class="pfm-training-camp-notebook">
  <span class="pfm-camp-kicker">PFM Training Camp Watch</span>

  <p class="pfm-camp-lede">
    Training camp creates a lot of noise. One great practice does not change how we see a team. A major injury, a real quarterback change or a starting job that changes the shape of a roster absolutely can.
  </p>

  <p>
    That is why these five teams are worth watching closely. The <a href="/nfl-team-rankings/">PFM NFL Team Rankings</a> already show where each team is strong and where the concern sits. Camp can start answering whether those weak spots are getting better, getting worse or staying exactly where they are.
  </p>

  <p>
    Carolina has already given us a good example. The Panthers dropped after losing Nic Scourton and learning Taylor Moton will miss the start of the season. That is the kind of camp development that matters. A viral catch in one-on-ones is not.
  </p>

  <div class="pfm-camp-table-wrap" role="region" aria-label="Five NFL teams PFM is watching in training camp" tabindex="0">
    <table class="pfm-camp-table">
      <caption>Five teams that could move during 2026 NFL training camp</caption>
      <thead>
        <tr>
          <th scope="col">Team</th>
          <th scope="col">PFM Rank</th>
          <th scope="col">Current Strength</th>
          <th scope="col">Camp Question</th>
        </tr>
      </thead>
      <tbody>
        <tr>
          <td><span class="pfm-camp-team-name"><img src="https://a.espncdn.com/i/teamlogos/nfl/500/chi.png" alt="Chicago Bears logo" loading="lazy" decoding="async">Chicago Bears</span></td>
          <td>No. 12</td>
          <td>Offense — 85.8</td>
          <td>Can the protection and new pass-catcher order keep the offense rolling?</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <td><span class="pfm-camp-team-name"><img src="https://a.espncdn.com/i/teamlogos/nfl/500/dal.png" alt="Dallas Cowboys logo" loading="lazy" decoding="async">Dallas Cowboys</span></td>
          <td>No. 21</td>
          <td>Offense — 86.0</td>
          <td>Can Christian Parker get enough out of a defense rated 73.9?</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <td><span class="pfm-camp-team-name"><img src="https://a.espncdn.com/i/teamlogos/nfl/500/pit.png" alt="Pittsburgh Steelers logo" loading="lazy" decoding="async">Pittsburgh Steelers</span></td>
          <td>No. 18</td>
          <td>Defense — 83.4</td>
          <td>How much trust should PFM put in the quarterback room beyond Aaron Rodgers?</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <td><span class="pfm-camp-team-name"><img src="https://a.espncdn.com/i/teamlogos/nfl/500/car.png" alt="Carolina Panthers logo" loading="lazy" decoding="async">Carolina Panthers</span></td>
          <td>No. 29</td>
          <td>QB Stability — 74.9</td>
          <td>Can the roster absorb major losses at pass rusher and offensive tackle?</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <td><span class="pfm-camp-team-name"><img src="https://a.espncdn.com/i/teamlogos/nfl/500/ari.png" alt="Arizona Cardinals logo" loading="lazy" decoding="async">Arizona Cardinals</span></td>
          <td>No. 27</td>
          <td>QB Stability — 77.9</td>
          <td>How quickly can Mike LaFleur settle the offense around Jacoby Brissett?</td>
        </tr>
      </tbody>
    </table>
  </div>

  <div class="pfm-camp-team-tag"><img src="https://a.espncdn.com/i/teamlogos/nfl/500/chi.png" alt="Chicago Bears logo" loading="lazy" decoding="async"><span>Chicago Bears</span></div>

  <h2>Chicago Is Close Enough to the Top 10 That Camp Matters</h2>

  <p>
    Chicago is not trying to figure out whether Caleb Williams can play. That question was answered last season. Williams set a Bears single-season passing record, Ben Johnson&#8217;s offense helped win the NFC North and the Bears finally looked like a team that could put real pressure on a defense in more than one way.
  </p>

  <p>
    The 2026 question is whether that offense can hold its shape after a few important changes. DJ Moore is gone. Drew Dalman retired. Rome Odunze and Luther Burden III move into bigger spots in the receiving group, while Garrett Bradbury has to settle in at center. Left tackle is another camp battle worth watching.
  </p>

  <div class="pfm-camp-team-snapshot" aria-label="Chicago Bears PFM snapshot">
    <div>
      <span>PFM Rank</span>
      <strong>No. 12</strong>
    </div>
    <div>
      <span>PFM Score</span>
      <strong>84.0</strong>
    </div>
    <div>
      <span>Best Grade</span>
      <strong>Offense 85.8</strong>
    </div>
  </div>

  <p>
    This is where camp can tell us something useful without overreacting to every rep. If the offensive line settles quickly and Williams looks comfortable with Odunze, Burden and Colston Loveland handling more of the passing game, Chicago has a real chance to push higher. If protection becomes a weekly issue, the 85.8 offensive grade starts to feel less secure.
  </p>

  <div class="pfm-camp-trigger">
    <span>What would actually move PFM?</span>
    <p>A meaningful offensive-line injury, a clear starting change at left tackle or center, or another roster move that changes Williams&#8217; protection or pass-catching support.</p>
  </div>

  <a class="pfm-camp-team-link" href="/nfl-team-dashboards/chicago-bears/">View the Chicago Bears Dashboard</a>

  <div class="pfm-camp-team-tag"><img src="https://a.espncdn.com/i/teamlogos/nfl/500/dal.png" alt="Dallas Cowboys logo" loading="lazy" decoding="async"><span>Dallas Cowboys</span></div>

  <h2>Dallas Has One of the Easiest Rankings to Explain</h2>

  <p>
    Dallas is No. 21 because the offense and defense look like two totally different teams. Dak Prescott, CeeDee Lamb and George Pickens give the Cowboys enough firepower to score with almost anyone. PFM has the offense at 86.0. The defense however sits at 73.9.
  </p>

  <p>
    That large gap is the whole story. The Cowboys finished last in points allowed in 2025, and now Christian Parker takes over the defense with a new staff and a revised group of players. The first thing I want to see is not an interception in a July practice. It is whether Dallas has enough pass rush to stop making the secondary cover forever.
  </p>

  <div class="pfm-camp-team-snapshot" aria-label="Dallas Cowboys PFM snapshot">
    <div>
      <span>PFM Rank</span>
      <strong>No. 21</strong>
    </div>
    <div>
      <span>Offense</span>
      <strong>86.0</strong>
    </div>
    <div>
      <span>Defense</span>
      <strong>73.9</strong>
    </div>
  </div>

  <p>
    Dallas does not need the defense to become Seattle overnight. It does need enough pressure, tackling and communication to stop wasting good offensive football. If Parker gets that group into the middle of the league, No. 21 will look low in a hurry. If the same problems follow them into September, the offense will be carrying too much again.
  </p>

  <div class="pfm-camp-trigger">
    <span>What would actually move PFM?</span>
    <p>A major defensive injury, a roster addition, or a starting-role change that clearly raises or lowers the talent available to Parker. One strong practice from the defense is not enough.</p>
  </div>

  <a class="pfm-camp-team-link" href="/nfl-team-dashboards/dallas-cowboys/">View the Dallas Cowboys Dashboard</a>

  <div class="pfm-camp-team-tag"><img src="https://a.espncdn.com/i/teamlogos/nfl/500/pit.png" alt="Pittsburgh Steelers logo" loading="lazy" decoding="async"><span>Pittsburgh Steelers</span></div>

  <h2>Pittsburgh&#8217;s Defense Is Ready. The Quarterback Timeline Is Not.</h2>

  <p>
    Pittsburgh is one of the stranger teams on our board. The Steelers have an 83.4 defensive grade and an 83.2 Coaching Direction grade, but QB Stability is only 75.8. That is how a team with plenty to like lands at No. 18 instead of comfortably inside the playoff-contender group.
  </p>

  <p>
    Aaron Rodgers is back for one final season, so there is not much mystery about who should open the year at quarterback. The bigger question is what comes after him. Pittsburgh also has Mason Rudolph, Will Howard and Drew Allar in the room, and Mike McCarthy now gets a full camp to work with all four quarterbacks.
  </p>

  <div class="pfm-camp-team-snapshot" aria-label="Pittsburgh Steelers PFM snapshot">
    <div>
      <span>PFM Rank</span>
      <strong>No. 18</strong>
    </div>
    <div>
      <span>Defense</span>
      <strong>83.4</strong>
    </div>
    <div>
      <span>QB Stability</span>
      <strong>75.8</strong>
    </div>
  </div>

  <p>
    PFM would not raise Pittsburgh because Allar throws a pretty deep ball in Latrobe. That is exactly the kind of camp trap worth avoiding. But if one of the young quarterbacks clearly becomes a trusted No. 2, or if Rodgers&#8217; health changes the short-term outlook, the quarterback grade has a reason to move.
  </p>

  <p>
    The Steelers do not need more proof that the defense can keep them in games. They need the quarterback picture to become less fragile. That is the part of this team that can change the ranking fastest.
  </p>

  <div class="pfm-camp-trigger">
    <span>What would actually move PFM?</span>
    <p>Any verified change to Rodgers&#8217; availability, a meaningful quarterback roster move, or enough clarity behind him to change the depth and succession outlook.</p>
  </div>

  <a class="pfm-camp-team-link" href="/nfl-team-dashboards/pittsburgh-steelers/">View the Pittsburgh Steelers Dashboard</a>

  <div class="pfm-camp-team-tag"><img src="https://a.espncdn.com/i/teamlogos/nfl/500/car.png" alt="Carolina Panthers logo" loading="lazy" decoding="async"><span>Carolina Panthers</span></div>

  <h2>Carolina Already Showed Why Training Camp Can Change a Ranking</h2>

  <p>
    Carolina is the exact example that shows what can change a team ranking in training camp. The Panthers did not drop because somebody had a bad practice. They dropped because the roster changed in a real way.
  </p>

  <p>
    Nic Scourton tore his ACL and went to injured reserve. Taylor Moton is expected to miss the start of the season. Ikem Ekwonu is also working back from a major knee injury. PFM moved Carolina down 0.31 on July 24 because those losses hit the pass rush, offensive line and roster depth at the same time.
  </p>

  <div class="pfm-camp-team-snapshot" aria-label="Carolina Panthers PFM snapshot">
    <div>
      <span>PFM Rank</span>
      <strong>No. 29</strong>
    </div>
    <div>
      <span>PFM Score</span>
      <strong>72.3</strong>
    </div>
    <div>
      <span>Roster Strength</span>
      <strong>70.1</strong>
    </div>
  </div>

  <p>
    There is still upside here. Bryce Young gets another year with Dave Canales, Tetairoa McMillan is coming off a strong rookie season, and the defense added Jaelan Phillips and Devin Lloyd. But Carolina is already asking younger linemen and new defenders to take on more than expected.
  </p>

  <p>
    That is why the Panthers can still move in either direction before Week 1. Good health news at tackle would help. Another major loss at a thin position would hurt. The roster does not have much room left for bad injury luck.
  </p>

  <div class="pfm-camp-trigger">
    <span>What would actually move PFM?</span>
    <p>More verified injury news, a meaningful return timetable for the offensive line, or a roster addition that changes the depth at tackle or edge rusher.</p>
  </div>

  <a class="pfm-camp-team-link" href="/nfl-team-dashboards/carolina-panthers/">View the Carolina Panthers Dashboard</a>

  <div class="pfm-camp-team-tag"><img src="https://a.espncdn.com/i/teamlogos/nfl/500/ari.png" alt="Arizona Cardinals logo" loading="lazy" decoding="async"><span>Arizona Cardinals</span></div>

  <h2>Arizona Has More Questions Than One Quarterback Contract Can Fix</h2>

  <p>
    Arizona settled one issue Sunday when Jacoby Brissett received a reworked deal and moved back toward the starting job. That matters. It removes some immediate uncertainty for a new offense that already has enough to install under Mike LaFleur.
  </p>

  <p>
    It does not solve the whole quarterback question. Brissett is still scheduled to become a free agent after the season, Gardner Minshew is behind him and rookie Carson Beck is part of the longer-term conversation. That helps explain why PFM can give Arizona a respectable 77.9 QB Stability grade and still keep the Cardinals at No. 27 overall.
  </p>

  <div class="pfm-camp-team-snapshot" aria-label="Arizona Cardinals PFM snapshot">
    <div>
      <span>PFM Rank</span>
      <strong>No. 27</strong>
    </div>
    <div>
      <span>PFM Score</span>
      <strong>73.0</strong>
    </div>
    <div>
      <span>Coaching Direction</span>
      <strong>71.9</strong>
    </div>
  </div>

  <p>
    The more interesting camp question is what LaFleur can build around Brissett, Marvin Harrison Jr., Trey McBride and first-round running back Jeremiyah Love. Arizona&#8217;s offense is rated 73.6 and the defense 72.2. There is room to climb, but there is no single strength carrying this team yet.
  </p>

  <p>
    If the quarterback order settles and the offense comes out of camp healthy with clear roles, Arizona can start closing the gap on the middle of the league. If the new offense still looks unsettled or the defense loses more depth, No. 27 may be exactly where the Cardinals belong.
  </p>

  <div class="pfm-camp-trigger">
    <span>What would actually move PFM?</span>
    <p>A verified quarterback-status change, a major injury, a roster move, or a starting-role decision that changes the way LaFleur&#8217;s offense or Nick Rallis&#8217; defense should be graded.</p>
  </div>

  <a class="pfm-camp-team-link" href="/nfl-team-dashboards/arizona-cardinals/">View the Arizona Cardinals Dashboard</a>

  <h2>What Actually Changes a PFM Rating During Training Camp?</h2>

  <p>
    This is the part that matters most. Training camp is useful, but it is also where one good rep can become a week of headlines. PFM will not chase that.
  </p>

  <div class="pfm-camp-change-grid">
    <section class="pfm-camp-change-card" aria-labelledby="pfm-camp-matters">
      <h3 id="pfm-camp-matters">What can move a rating</h3>
      <ul>
        <li>Significant injuries or verified return timelines</li>
        <li>A starting-quarterback change</li>
        <li>A meaningful roster addition or release</li>
        <li>A confirmed starting-role change that affects team strength</li>
        <li>Health or availability news that changes depth at an important position</li>
      </ul>
    </section>

    <section class="pfm-camp-change-card is-noise" aria-labelledby="pfm-camp-noise">
      <h3 id="pfm-camp-noise">What will not move it by itself</h3>
      <ul>
        <li>One great practice</li>
        <li>One interception or one dropped pass</li>
        <li>A viral one-on-one clip</li>
        <li>Generic praise from a coach</li>
        <li>An unofficial depth chart before the competition is settled</li>
      </ul>
    </section>
  </div>

  <div class="pfm-camp-method">
    <strong>The point:</strong>
    PFM is not trying to rank who won practice. The ratings will move when the football situation changes enough that we would see the team differently on Sunday.
  </div>

  <div class="pfm-camp-final">
    <strong>Keep checking the board:</strong>
    The <a href="/nfl-team-rankings/">2026 NFL Team Rankings</a> are updated when injuries, quarterback changes, roster moves and other verified developments change the way a team should be graded.
  </div>

  <p class="pfm-camp-freshness">
    PFM ratings referenced in this article were updated July 24, 2026. Training-camp news and roster context were reviewed July 27, 2026.
  </p>

  <details class="pfm-camp-source-review">
    <summary>Sources reviewed for current training-camp context</summary>
    <div>
      <p>
        PFM reviewed current team and NFL reporting for the roster, injury and quarterback details used above. The PFM rankings remain the source for the ratings and ranks.
      </p>
      <ul>
        <li><a href="https://profootballmania.com/nfl-team-rankings/">PFM — 2026 NFL Team Rankings</a></li>
        <li><a href="https://www.nfl.com/training-camp">NFL.com — 2026 Training Camp Hub and team storylines</a></li>
        <li><a href="https://www.nfl.com/news/nfl-news-roundup-latest-league-updates-from-friday-july-24">NFL.com — July 24 league news and injury updates</a></li>
      </ul>
    </div>
  </details>
</article>
<p>The post <a href="https://profootballmania.com/2026/07/28/2026-nfl-training-camp-teams-to-watch-pfm-rankings/">2026 NFL Training Camp: 5 Teams That Could Move Most in the PFM Rankings</a> appeared first on <a href="https://profootballmania.com">Pro Football Mania</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://profootballmania.com/2026/07/28/2026-nfl-training-camp-teams-to-watch-pfm-rankings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">53676</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
