PFM NFL Draft
PFM ranks the top 75 prospects in the 2027 NFL Draft class. Outside draft boards help show where the class is being valued, but PFM keeps its own Top 75. The order changes as the college season, all-star games, combine and pro days add more evidence.
Big Board reviewed October 3, 2026.
Search by player or school, or narrow the Top 75 by position.
PFM Rank is the Top 75 order. Consensus is the median of the current outside rankings available for each prospect. “Limited” means only one current outside ranking is available for that player.
| Rank | Prospect | Pos. | School | Consensus | PFM vs. consensus | Move |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jeremiah Smith | WR | Ohio State | 1.03 inputs | 0 | – |
| 2 | Leonard Moore | CB | Notre Dame | 3.03 inputs | +1.0 | – |
| 3 | Colin Simmons | EDGE | Texas | 4.03 inputs | +1.0 | – |
| 4 | Dylan Stewart | EDGE | South Carolina | 4.53 inputs | +0.5 | – |
| 5 | Arch Manning | QB | Texas | 6.03 inputs | +1.0 | – |
| 6 | Dante Moore | QB | Oregon | 7.13 inputs | +1.1 | – |
| 7 | Cam Coleman | WR | Texas | 7.43 inputs | +0.4 | – |
| 8 | Trevor Goosby | OT | Texas | 9.03 inputs | +1.0 | – |
| 9 | Jordan Seaton | OT | LSU | 10.03 inputs | +1.0 | – |
| 10 | Ellis Robinson IV | CB | Georgia | 13.03 inputs | +3.0 | – |
| 11 | A'Mauri Washington | DT | Oregon | 15.03 inputs | +4.0 | – |
| 12 | Jadan Baugh | RB | Florida | 16.03 inputs | +4.0 | – |
| 13 | K.J. Bolden | S | Georgia | 16.03 inputs | +3.0 | – |
| 14 | David Stone | DT | Oklahoma | 16.13 inputs | +2.1 | – |
| 15 | Will Echoles | DT | Ole Miss | 17.03 inputs | +2.0 | – |
| 16 | Charlie Becker | WR | Indiana | 18.03 inputs | +2.0 | – |
| 17 | Yhonzae Pierre | EDGE | Alabama | 21.13 inputs | +4.1 | – |
| 18 | Jamari Johnson | TE | Oregon | 22.43 inputs | +4.4 | – |
| 19 | Julian Sayin | QB | Ohio State | 22.43 inputs | +3.4 | – |
| 20 | Kelley Jones | CB | Mississippi State | 23.03 inputs | +3.0 | – |
| 21 | Trinidad Chambliss | QB | Ole Miss | 23.03 inputs | +2.0 | – |
| 22 | Ashton Hampton | CB | Clemson | 24.03 inputs | +2.0 | – |
| 23 | Justin Scott | DT | Miami | 26.53 inputs | +3.5 | – |
| 24 | C.J. Carr | QB | Notre Dame | 27.23 inputs | +3.2 | – |
| 25 | Trevor Lauck | OT | Iowa | 27.53 inputs | +2.5 | – |
| 26 | Darian Mensah | QB | Miami | 28.03 inputs | +2.0 | – |
| 27 | Kewan Lacy | RB | Ole Miss | 28.33 inputs | +1.3 | – |
| 28 | Trey'Dez Green | TE | LSU | 29.03 inputs | +1.0 | – |
| 29 | Drew Mestemaker | QB | Oklahoma State | 29.43 inputs | +0.4 | – |
| 30 | Brauntae Johnson | S | Notre Dame | 18.01 input | Limited | – |
| 31 | Tae Johnson | S | Notre Dame | 30.12 inputs | -0.9 | – |
| 32 | Cayden Green | OT | Missouri | 30.83 inputs | -1.2 | – |
| 33 | Matayo Uiagalelei | EDGE | Oregon | 32.83 inputs | -0.2 | – |
| 34 | Sammy Brown | LB | Clemson | 33.03 inputs | -1.0 | – |
| 35 | Ryan Coleman-Williams | WR | Alabama | 34.03 inputs | -1.0 | – |
| 36 | Chris Cole | LB | Georgia | 34.73 inputs | -1.3 | – |
| 37 | A.J. Holmes Jr. | DT | Texas Tech | 35.23 inputs | -1.8 | – |
| 38 | Nick Marsh | WR | Indiana | 35.23 inputs | -2.8 | – |
| 39 | Greg Johnson | IOL | Minnesota | 35.93 inputs | -3.1 | – |
| 40 | Ahmad Hardy | RB | Missouri | 37.03 inputs | -3.0 | – |
| 41 | Will Heldt | EDGE | Clemson | 37.53 inputs | -3.5 | – |
| 42 | KJ Duff | WR | Rutgers | 37.62 inputs | -4.4 | – |
| 43 | Ahmad Moten Sr. | DT | Miami | 38.03 inputs | -5.0 | – |
| 44 | Kade Pieper | IOL | Iowa | 38.53 inputs | -5.5 | – |
| 45 | Kyngstonn Viliamu-Asa | LB | Notre Dame | 39.03 inputs | -6.0 | – |
| 46 | Carter Smith | OT | Indiana | 39.13 inputs | -6.9 | – |
| 47 | Kenyatta Jackson Jr. | EDGE | Ohio State | 43.33 inputs | -3.7 | – |
| 48 | LaNorris Sellers | QB | South Carolina | 45.03 inputs | -3.0 | – |
| 49 | Zabien Brown | CB | Alabama | 47.03 inputs | -2.0 | – |
| 50 | Austin Siereveld | IOL | Ohio State | 48.03 inputs | -2.0 | – |
| 51 | Damon Wilson II | EDGE | Miami | 48.53 inputs | -2.5 | – |
| 52 | Mario Craver | WR | Texas A&M | 49.02 inputs | -3.0 | – |
| 53 | Ryan Wingo | WR | Texas | 49.12 inputs | -3.9 | – |
| 54 | Melvin Siani | OT | Texas | 49.52 inputs | -4.5 | – |
| 55 | Reed Harris | WR | Arizona State | 49.52 inputs | -5.5 | – |
| 56 | Jelani McDonald | S | Texas | 51.33 inputs | -4.7 | – |
| 57 | Clev Lubin | EDGE | Louisville | 52.03 inputs | -5.0 | – |
| 58 | Zach Lutmer | S | Iowa | 53.52 inputs | -4.5 | – |
| 59 | Vicari Swain | CB | South Carolina | 54.62 inputs | -4.4 | – |
| 60 | John Henry Daley | EDGE | Michigan | 56.93 inputs | -3.1 | – |
| 61 | Sam Leavitt | QB | LSU | 57.22 inputs | -3.8 | – |
| 62 | Devan Thompkins | DT | Alabama | 57.52 inputs | -4.5 | – |
| 63 | Quincy Rhodes Jr. | EDGE | Arkansas | 59.02 inputs | -4.0 | – |
| 64 | Bryant Wesco Jr. | WR | Clemson | 59.72 inputs | -4.3 | – |
| 65 | Omarion Miller | WR | Arizona State | 60.03 inputs | -5.0 | – |
| 66 | Jacarrius Peak | OT | South Carolina | 61.03 inputs | -5.0 | – |
| 67 | Rasheem Biles | LB | Texas | 62.12 inputs | -4.9 | – |
| 68 | Christian Alliegro | LB | Ohio State | 51.01 input | Limited | – |
| 69 | Jordan Ross | EDGE | LSU | 63.03 inputs | -6.0 | – |
| 70 | Boubacar Traore | EDGE | Notre Dame | 64.02 inputs | -6.0 | – |
| 71 | Princewill Umanmielen | EDGE | LSU | 54.01 input | Limited | – |
| 72 | Brice Pollock | CB | Texas Tech | 66.52 inputs | -5.5 | – |
| 73 | O.J. Frederique Jr. | CB | Miami | 66.52 inputs | -6.5 | – |
| 74 | Jide Abasiri | DT | USC | 57.01 input | Limited | – |
| 75 | Iapani Laloulu | IOL | Oregon | 58.01 input | Limited | – |
A positive gap means PFM has the prospect higher than the current consensus. The gap shows where the rankings differ; the football case still determines PFM’s order.
These programs place the most players on PFM’s current Big Board.
PFM checks multiple current rankings to see where prospects are being valued across the draft market, rather than leaning on one outlet.
Outside rankings provide context. PFM can rank a prospect higher or lower when the football case supports it.
New on-field evidence, a changed role, injury news, a return or broad movement across trusted boards can change the order. One headline or one outlet does not.
Each update keeps the prior board intact, so risers and fallers reflect real movement through the draft cycle instead of a rewritten ranking.
PFM uses outside rankings to understand the draft market, then publishes its own Top 75. A ranking gap shows disagreement; it does not replace the football evaluation behind PFM’s order.