Which teams have enough talent and depth to hold up for a full season? Roster Strength looks at the full lineup, from the stars at the top to the depth behind them. It is one complete team grade rather than a collection of separate position-group ratings.
The three teams with the strongest Roster Strength grades.
Tap or click any heading to sort the rankings.
| 1 | ![]() Seattle SeahawksSEA · 0-0 |
85.5 |
91.3 | No. 1 | Championship Core | â–¬ 0.0 |
| 2 | ![]() San Francisco 49ersSF · 0-0 |
85.3 |
87.2 | No. 3 | Championship Core | â–¬ 0.0 |
| 3 | ![]() Los Angeles RamsLAR · 0-0 |
85.0 |
90.6 | No. 2 | Strong | â–¬ 0.0 |
| 4 | ![]() Detroit LionsDET · 0-0 |
85.0 |
86.8 | No. 5 | Strong | â–¬ 0.0 |
| 5 | ![]() Kansas City ChiefsKC · 0-0 |
84.3 |
87.1 | No. 4 | Strong | â–¬ 0.0 |
| 6 | ![]() Philadelphia EaglesPHI · 0-0 |
83.8 |
86.1 | No. 6 | Strong | â–¬ 0.0 |
| 7 | ![]() Buffalo BillsBUF · 0-0 |
82.1 |
85.5 | No. 8 | Strong | â–¬ 0.0 |
| 8 | ![]() Baltimore RavensBAL · 0-0 |
81.3 |
80.9 | No. 15 | Strong | â–¬ 0.0 |
| 9 | ![]() Green Bay PackersGB · 0-0 |
81.0 |
83.7 | No. 12 | Strong | â–¬ 0.0 |
| 10 | ![]() Cincinnati BengalsCIN · 0-0 |
80.6 |
79.3 | No. 16 | Strong | â–¬ 0.0 |
| 11 | ![]() Denver BroncosDEN · 0-0 |
80.4 |
84.9 | No. 9 | Strong | â–¬ 0.0 |
| 12 | ![]() Jacksonville JaguarsJAX · 0-0 |
80.4 |
83.2 | No. 13 | Strong | â–¬ 0.0 |
| 13 | ![]() New England PatriotsNE · 0-0 |
80.4 |
85.9 | No. 7 | Strong | â–¬ 0.0 |
| 14 | ![]() Houston TexansHOU · 0-0 |
80.3 |
84.8 | No. 10 | Strong | â–¬ 0.0 |
| 15 | ![]() Washington CommandersWSH · 0-0 |
80.2 |
79.1 | No. 18 | Strong | â–¬ 0.0 |
| 16 | ![]() Pittsburgh SteelersPIT · 0-0 |
79.9 |
79.1 | No. 17 | Solid | â–¬ 0.0 |
| 17 | ![]() Chicago BearsCHI · 0-0 |
79.8 |
82.2 | No. 14 | Solid | â–¬ 0.0 |
| 18 | ![]() Miami DolphinsMIA · 0-0 |
79.7 |
75.3 | No. 24 | Solid | â–¬ 0.0 |
| 19 | ![]() New York JetsNYJ · 0-0 |
79.5 |
73.6 | No. 26 | Solid | â–¬ 0.0 |
| 20 | ![]() Minnesota VikingsMIN · 0-0 |
79.4 |
78.8 | No. 19 | Solid | â–¬ 0.0 |
| 21 | ![]() Los Angeles ChargersLAC · 0-0 |
79.3 |
84.0 | No. 11 | Solid | â–¬ 0.0 |
| 22 | ![]() Dallas CowboysDAL · 0-0 |
79.3 |
77.5 | No. 21 | Solid | â–¬ 0.0 |
| 23 | ![]() Tampa Bay BuccaneersTB · 0-0 |
78.6 |
78.3 | No. 20 | Solid | â–¬ 0.0 |
| 24 | ![]() Atlanta FalconsATL · 0-0 |
77.8 |
76.8 | No. 22 | Solid | â–¬ 0.0 |
| 25 | ![]() Cleveland BrownsCLE · 0-0 |
76.7 |
71.4 | No. 30 | Solid | â–¬ 0.0 |
| 26 | ![]() Las Vegas RaidersLV · 0-0 |
76.1 |
72.7 | No. 28 | Solid | â–¬ 0.0 |
| 27 | ![]() Indianapolis ColtsIND · 0-0 |
74.9 |
76.1 | No. 23 | Needs Help | â–¬ 0.0 |
| 28 | ![]() Arizona CardinalsARI · 0-0 |
74.6 |
73.7 | No. 25 | Needs Help | â–¬ 0.0 |
| 29 | ![]() New York GiantsNYG · 0-0 |
73.8 |
73.3 | No. 27 | Needs Help | â–¬ 0.0 |
| 30 | ![]() New Orleans SaintsNO · 0-0 |
71.9 |
70.6 | No. 32 | Needs Help | â–¬ 0.0 |
| 31 | ![]() Tennessee TitansTEN · 0-0 |
71.2 |
71.2 | No. 31 | Needs Help | â–¬ 0.0 |
| 32 | ![]() Carolina PanthersCAR · 0-0 |
70.9 |
72.5 | No. 29 | Needs Help | â–¬ 0.0 |
Talent matters, but depth is what keeps a season from falling apart when injuries hit. Roster Strength grades the full team, not just the biggest names. The PFM Team Score and overall NFL rank show whether the quarterback, coaching staff and recent play are good enough to turn that roster into a contender.