2026 NFL Roster Strength Rankings
Which teams have enough talent and depth to hold up for a full season? Roster Strength looks at the full lineup, from the stars at the top to the depth behind them. It is one complete team grade rather than a collection of separate position-group ratings.
78.4League Average
No. 1 RosterSeattle Seahawks84.5 Roster Strength
Championship Cores0Teams graded 85+
What 85+ MeansReal DepthA roster with enough answers to win in January
Best Complete Rosters
Top 3 Rosters
The three teams with the strongest Roster Strength grades.
All 32 Teams
Tap or click any heading to sort the rankings.
| 1 |  Seattle SeahawksSEA · 3-3 |
84.5 |
86.7 | No. 3 | Strong | ▲ +0.57 |
| 2 |  Kansas City ChiefsKC · 5-0 |
84.5 |
92.4 | No. 1 | Strong | ▼ -0.02 |
| 3 |  Los Angeles RamsLAR · 2-4 |
83.8 |
83.9 | No. 7 | Strong | ▲ +0.27 |
| 4 |  San Francisco 49ersSF · 6-0 |
83.7 |
89.5 | No. 2 | Strong | ▬ 0.0 |
| 5 |  Detroit LionsDET · 3-2 |
83.4 |
84.0 | No. 6 | Strong | ▼ -0.57 |
| 6 |  Philadelphia EaglesPHI · 2-4 |
82.4 |
75.1 | No. 24 | Strong | ▼ -0.75 |
| 7 |  Buffalo BillsBUF · 5-1 |
82.0 |
84.1 | No. 5 | Strong | ▼ -0.01 |
| 8 |  Baltimore RavensBAL · 4-2 |
80.5 |
82.5 | No. 11 | Strong | ▲ +0.52 |
| 9 |  Denver BroncosDEN · 4-2 |
80.4 |
82.4 | No. 12 | Strong | ▬ 0.0 |
| 10 |  Cincinnati BengalsCIN · 3-2 |
80.0 |
81.6 | No. 13 | Strong | ▼ -0.16 |
| 11 |  Chicago BearsCHI · 4-2 |
79.9 |
85.3 | No. 4 | Solid | ▼ -0.03 |
| 12 |  Jacksonville JaguarsJAX · 4-2 |
79.7 |
82.7 | No. 9 | Solid | ▬ 0.0 |
| 13 |  Green Bay PackersGB · 4-2 |
79.4 |
82.6 | No. 10 | Solid | ▼ -0.05 |
| 14 |  Minnesota VikingsMIN · 5-0 |
79.4 |
80.8 | No. 14 | Solid | ▬ 0.0 |
| 15 |  New York JetsNYJ · 2-4 |
78.8 |
75.6 | No. 23 | Solid | ▲ +0.09 |
| 16 |  Houston TexansHOU · 2-4 |
78.8 |
80.0 | No. 15 | Solid | ▲ +0.04 |
| 17 |  Washington CommandersWSH · 1-4 |
78.6 |
78.4 | No. 17 | Solid | ▼ -0.04 |
| 18 |  Tampa Bay BuccaneersTB · 1-5 |
78.4 |
74.2 | No. 25 | Solid | ▲ +0.01 |
| 19 |  Miami DolphinsMIA · 0-5 |
78.3 |
72.5 | No. 31 | Solid | ▲ +0.02 |
| 20 |  Pittsburgh SteelersPIT · 4-2 |
78.3 |
79.1 | No. 16 | Solid | ▼ -0.51 |
| 21 |  Dallas CowboysDAL · 2-4 |
77.8 |
76.1 | No. 20 | Solid | ▲ +0.03 |
| 22 |  Los Angeles ChargersLAC · 0-6 |
77.7 |
76.5 | No. 18 | Solid | ▼ -0.02 |
| 23 |  New England PatriotsNE · 4-2 |
76.9 |
82.7 | No. 8 | Solid | ▼ -0.02 |
| 24 |  Atlanta FalconsATL · 2-4 |
76.8 |
76.4 | No. 19 | Solid | ▲ +0.27 |
| 25 |  Cleveland BrownsCLE · 4-2 |
75.8 |
73.2 | No. 30 | Solid | ▼ -0.07 |
| 26 |  Las Vegas RaidersLV · 3-3 |
75.7 |
75.6 | No. 22 | Solid | ▼ -0.08 |
| 27 |  Indianapolis ColtsIND · 2-4 |
74.9 |
73.7 | No. 27 | Needs Help | ▲ +0.1 |
| 28 |  New Orleans SaintsNO · 2-4 |
73.6 |
73.8 | No. 26 | Needs Help | ▲ +0.1 |
| 29 |  Arizona CardinalsARI · 2-4 |
72.8 |
73.3 | No. 28 | Needs Help | ▲ +0.03 |
| 30 |  New York GiantsNYG · 3-2 |
72.8 |
73.2 | No. 29 | Needs Help | ▼ -0.01 |
| 31 |  Tennessee TitansTEN · 1-5 |
69.9 |
70.2 | No. 32 | Thin | ▲ +0.02 |
| 32 |  Carolina PanthersCAR · 3-2 |
69.1 |
75.7 | No. 21 | Thin | ▼ -0.08 |
How to Read the Rankings
Talent Is Only Part of the Story
Talent matters, but depth is what keeps a season from falling apart when injuries hit. Roster Strength grades the full team, not just the biggest names. The PFM Team Score and overall NFL rank show whether the quarterback, coaching staff and recent play are good enough to turn that roster into a contender.
90+ Elite85–89 Championship Core80–84 Strong75–79 Solid70–74 Needs Help<70 Thin
PFM ratings updated
How PFM grades NFL teams