Offensive Rating 90.5
PFM Offensive Rating
PFM Offensive Rating is not just a box-score stat. It is built to capture the full offensive picture: quarterback stability, skill-position support, explosiveness, roster strength and the coaching environment around the offense.
Last reviewed .
A top offensive rating points to more than one good player or one play caller. The grade is strongest when quarterback stability, explosive ability, roster support and coaching context all give the offense answers before matchup week starts.
Offensive Rating 90.5
Buffalo Bills, Detroit Lions, Los Angeles Rams, Seattle Seahawks, Dallas Cowboys
QB Stability 88.1
Explosiveness 90.7
Offense +12.1 over defense
Teams are ranked by Offensive Rating first, with QB Stability, explosiveness, roster strength and coaching context beside it.
| #1 |
|
Elite Offensive Outlook: 90.5 | Elite Offensive Outlook: 88.0 | Elite Offensive Outlook: 90.7 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 82.1 | Major Offensive Concern: 72.5 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 85.5 | Elite Offensive Outlook | View Dashboard |
| #2 |
|
Elite Offensive Outlook: 88.5 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 85.4 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 84.8 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 85.0 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 85.7 | Elite Offensive Outlook: 86.8 | Elite Offensive Outlook | View Dashboard |
| #3 |
|
Elite Offensive Outlook: 88.0 | Elite Offensive Outlook: 86.0 | Elite Offensive Outlook: 90.0 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 85.0 | Elite Offensive Outlook: 87.6 | Elite Offensive Outlook: 90.6 | Elite Offensive Outlook | View Dashboard |
| #4 |
|
Elite Offensive Outlook: 86.6 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 84.5 | Elite Offensive Outlook: 88.8 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 85.5 | Elite Offensive Outlook: 87.8 | Elite Offensive Outlook: 91.3 | Elite Offensive Outlook | View Dashboard |
| #5 |
|
Elite Offensive Outlook: 86.0 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 81.6 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 80.5 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 79.3 | Major Offensive Concern: 73.7 | Offensive Questions: 77.5 | Elite Offensive Outlook | View Dashboard |
| #6 |
|
Strong Offensive Outlook: 85.9 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 85.1 | Elite Offensive Outlook: 88.4 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 81.0 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 83.2 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 83.7 | Strong Offensive Outlook | View Dashboard |
| #7 |
|
Strong Offensive Outlook: 85.3 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 85.7 | Elite Offensive Outlook: 87.5 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 81.3 | Major Offensive Concern: 71.3 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 80.9 | Strong Offensive Outlook | View Dashboard |
| #8 |
|
Strong Offensive Outlook: 85.1 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 85.7 | Offensive Questions: 77.9 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 85.3 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 84.7 | Elite Offensive Outlook: 87.2 | Strong Offensive Outlook | View Dashboard |
| #9 |
|
Strong Offensive Outlook: 84.2 | Elite Offensive Outlook: 88.1 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 81.3 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 80.6 | Major Offensive Concern: 73.8 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 79.3 | Strong Offensive Outlook | View Dashboard |
| #10 |
|
Strong Offensive Outlook: 84.1 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 85.4 | Offensive Questions: 77.4 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 83.8 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 82.4 | Elite Offensive Outlook: 86.1 | Strong Offensive Outlook | View Dashboard |
| #11 |
|
Strong Offensive Outlook: 83.4 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 84.0 | Elite Offensive Outlook: 88.7 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 80.4 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 85.0 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 85.9 | Strong Offensive Outlook | View Dashboard |
| #12 |
|
Strong Offensive Outlook: 83.2 | Elite Offensive Outlook: 86.2 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 80.0 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 84.3 | Elite Offensive Outlook: 92.3 | Elite Offensive Outlook: 87.1 | Strong Offensive Outlook | View Dashboard |
| #13 |
|
Strong Offensive Outlook: 82.8 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 84.0 | Elite Offensive Outlook: 86.5 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 79.8 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 82.9 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 82.2 | Strong Offensive Outlook | View Dashboard |
| #14 |
|
Strong Offensive Outlook: 82.4 | Elite Offensive Outlook: 86.1 | Offensive Questions: 75.3 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 79.3 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 85.6 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 84.0 | Strong Offensive Outlook | View Dashboard |
| #15 |
|
Strong Offensive Outlook: 82.4 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 84.8 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 79.3 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 80.2 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 79.3 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 79.1 | Strong Offensive Outlook | View Dashboard |
| #16 |
|
Solid Offensive Foundation: 81.3 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 83.1 | Offensive Questions: 74.5 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 80.4 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 85.0 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 84.9 | Solid Offensive Foundation | View Dashboard |
| #17 |
|
Solid Offensive Foundation: 80.8 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 80.2 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 82.0 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 78.6 | Offensive Questions: 76.6 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 78.3 | Solid Offensive Foundation | View Dashboard |
| #18 |
|
Solid Offensive Foundation: 80.7 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 82.0 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 79.0 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 80.4 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 80.0 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 83.2 | Solid Offensive Foundation | View Dashboard |
| #19 |
|
Solid Offensive Foundation: 79.1 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 83.3 | Major Offensive Concern: 73.4 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 80.3 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 81.0 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 84.8 | Solid Offensive Foundation | View Dashboard |
| #20 |
|
Solid Offensive Foundation: 78.6 | Offensive Questions: 77.7 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 79.5 | Offensive Questions: 77.8 | Offensive Questions: 74.5 | Offensive Questions: 76.8 | Solid Offensive Foundation | View Dashboard |
| #21 |
|
Solid Offensive Foundation: 78.3 | Offensive Questions: 77.0 | Major Offensive Concern: 71.1 | Offensive Questions: 74.9 | Major Offensive Concern: 73.4 | Offensive Questions: 76.1 | Solid Offensive Foundation | View Dashboard |
| #22 |
|
Solid Offensive Foundation: 78.0 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 78.9 | Major Offensive Concern: 70.1 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 79.7 | Major Offensive Concern: 72.5 | Offensive Questions: 75.3 | Solid Offensive Foundation | View Dashboard |
| #23 |
|
Offensive Questions: 77.6 | Offensive Questions: 75.8 | Major Offensive Concern: 70.8 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 79.9 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 83.2 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 79.1 | Offensive Questions | View Dashboard |
| #24 |
|
Offensive Questions: 76.6 | Offensive Questions: 76.4 | Offensive Questions: 77.3 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 79.4 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 82.2 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 78.8 | Offensive Questions | View Dashboard |
| #25 |
|
Offensive Questions: 76.0 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 78.4 | Major Offensive Concern: 67.4 | Offensive Questions: 74.6 | Major Offensive Concern: 71.9 | Major Offensive Concern: 73.7 | Offensive Questions | View Dashboard |
| #26 |
|
Offensive Questions: 74.7 | Major Offensive Concern: 70.3 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 79.0 | Major Offensive Concern: 73.8 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 81.2 | Major Offensive Concern: 73.3 | Offensive Questions | View Dashboard |
| #27 |
|
Major Offensive Concern: 72.9 | Offensive Questions: 75.1 | Major Offensive Concern: 71.8 | Major Offensive Concern: 70.9 | Major Offensive Concern: 70.8 | Major Offensive Concern: 72.5 | Major Offensive Concern | View Dashboard |
| #28 |
|
Major Offensive Concern: 72.7 | Offensive Questions: 74.0 | Major Offensive Concern: 69.7 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 79.5 | Major Offensive Concern: 72.8 | Major Offensive Concern: 73.6 | Major Offensive Concern | View Dashboard |
| #29 |
|
Major Offensive Concern: 72.3 | Offensive Questions: 74.0 | Major Offensive Concern: 65.2 | Offensive Questions: 76.1 | Major Offensive Concern: 73.6 | Major Offensive Concern: 72.7 | Major Offensive Concern | View Dashboard |
| #30 |
|
Major Offensive Concern: 69.5 | Major Offensive Concern: 67.0 | Major Offensive Concern: 63.7 | Offensive Questions: 76.7 | Major Offensive Concern: 73.0 | Major Offensive Concern: 71.4 | Major Offensive Concern | View Dashboard |
| #31 |
|
Major Offensive Concern: 69.0 | Major Offensive Concern: 69.2 | Major Offensive Concern: 61.1 | Major Offensive Concern: 71.9 | Major Offensive Concern: 72.0 | Major Offensive Concern: 70.6 | Major Offensive Concern | View Dashboard |
| #32 |
|
Major Offensive Concern: 68.8 | Major Offensive Concern: 73.9 | Major Offensive Concern: 67.3 | Major Offensive Concern: 71.2 | Offensive Questions: 74.8 | Major Offensive Concern: 71.2 | Major Offensive Concern | View Dashboard |
86.0 and higher
82.0 to 85.9
78.0 to 81.9
74.0 to 77.9
Below 74.0
Buffalo sit at 90.5 in Offensive Rating. With QB Stability at 88.0, Josh Allen gives the offense a cleaner starting point than most teams have.
Explosiveness at 88.7 gives New England real scoring punch, but Offensive Rating at 83.4 says the weekly floor is not as clean as the highlight plays.
Dallas show one of the clearer side-of-ball gaps: Offensive Rating 86.0 against Defensive Rating 73.9. That explains why the overall team read cannot stop at the offense.
Los Angeles have the quarterback base, big-play lift and offensive rating working together. Matthew Stafford sits behind QB Stability 86.0, while Offensive Rating 88.0 and Explosiveness 90.0 give the offense multiple ways to win a drive.
View Team DashboardBuffalo have the quarterback base, big-play lift and offensive rating working together. Josh Allen sits behind QB Stability 88.0, while Offensive Rating 90.5 and Explosiveness 90.7 give the offense multiple ways to win a drive.
View Team DashboardDetroit have the quarterback base, big-play lift and offensive rating working together. Jared Goff sits behind QB Stability 85.4, while Offensive Rating 88.5 and Explosiveness 84.8 give the offense multiple ways to win a drive.
View Team DashboardSeattle have the quarterback base, big-play lift and offensive rating working together. Sam Darnold sits behind QB Stability 84.5, while Offensive Rating 86.6 and Explosiveness 88.8 give the offense multiple ways to win a drive.
View Team DashboardGreen Bay have the quarterback base, big-play lift and offensive rating working together. Jordan Love sits behind QB Stability 85.1, while Offensive Rating 85.9 and Explosiveness 88.4 give the offense multiple ways to win a drive.
View Team DashboardCarolina need more answers on offense because Offensive Rating 72.9, QB Stability 75.1, Explosiveness 71.8 keep the ceiling in check. That puts more weight on protection, quarterback clarity and drive-to-drive consistency.
View Team DashboardCleveland need more answers on offense because Offensive Rating 69.5, QB Stability 67.0, Explosiveness 63.7 keep the ceiling in check. That puts more weight on protection, quarterback clarity and drive-to-drive consistency.
View Team DashboardLas Vegas need more answers on offense because Offensive Rating 72.3, QB Stability 74.0, Explosiveness 65.2 keep the ceiling in check. That puts more weight on protection, quarterback clarity and drive-to-drive consistency.
View Team DashboardNew Orleans need more answers on offense because Offensive Rating 69.0, QB Stability 69.2, Explosiveness 61.1 keep the ceiling in check. That puts more weight on protection, quarterback clarity and drive-to-drive consistency.
View Team DashboardNew York need more answers on offense because Offensive Rating 72.7, QB Stability 74.0, Explosiveness 69.7 keep the ceiling in check. That puts more weight on protection, quarterback clarity and drive-to-drive consistency.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Buffalo start with the quarterback environment. Josh Allen sits behind QB Stability 88.0, and Offensive Rating 90.5 gives the offense one of the league’s cleaner reads.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Detroit start with the quarterback environment. Jared Goff sits behind QB Stability 85.4, and Offensive Rating 88.5 gives the offense one of the league’s cleaner reads.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Los Angeles start with the quarterback environment. Matthew Stafford sits behind QB Stability 86.0, and Offensive Rating 88.0 gives the offense one of the league’s cleaner reads.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Seattle start with the quarterback environment. Sam Darnold sits behind QB Stability 84.5, and Offensive Rating 86.6 gives the offense one of the league’s cleaner reads.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Dallas sit at Offensive Rating 86.0 with QB Stability 81.6 and Roster Strength 79.3. Those three numbers explain the offensive floor better than one stat would.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Green Bay sit at Offensive Rating 85.9 with QB Stability 85.1 and Roster Strength 81.0. Those three numbers explain the offensive floor better than one stat would.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Baltimore sit at Offensive Rating 85.3 with QB Stability 85.7 and Roster Strength 81.3. Those three numbers explain the offensive floor better than one stat would.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: San Francisco sit at Offensive Rating 85.1 with QB Stability 85.7 and Roster Strength 85.3. Those three numbers explain the offensive floor better than one stat would.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Cincinnati sit at Offensive Rating 84.2 with QB Stability 88.1 and Roster Strength 80.6. Those three numbers explain the offensive floor better than one stat would.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Philadelphia sit at Offensive Rating 84.1 with QB Stability 85.4 and Roster Strength 83.8. Those three numbers explain the offensive floor better than one stat would.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: New England sit at Offensive Rating 83.4 with QB Stability 84.0 and Roster Strength 80.4. Those three numbers explain the offensive floor better than one stat would.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Kansas City sit at Offensive Rating 83.2 with QB Stability 86.2 and Roster Strength 84.3. Those three numbers explain the offensive floor better than one stat would.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Chicago sit at Offensive Rating 82.8 with QB Stability 84.0 and Roster Strength 79.8. Those three numbers explain the offensive floor better than one stat would.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Los Angeles sit at Offensive Rating 82.4 with QB Stability 86.1 and Roster Strength 79.3. Those three numbers explain the offensive floor better than one stat would.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Washington sit at Offensive Rating 82.4 with QB Stability 84.8 and Roster Strength 80.2. Those three numbers explain the offensive floor better than one stat would.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Denver sit at Offensive Rating 81.3 with QB Stability 83.1 and Roster Strength 80.4. Those three numbers explain the offensive floor better than one stat would.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Tampa Bay sit at Offensive Rating 80.8 with QB Stability 80.2 and Roster Strength 78.6. Those three numbers explain the offensive floor better than one stat would.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Jacksonville sit at Offensive Rating 80.7 with QB Stability 82.0 and Roster Strength 80.4. Those three numbers explain the offensive floor better than one stat would.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Houston sit at Offensive Rating 79.1 with QB Stability 83.3 and Roster Strength 80.3. Those three numbers explain the offensive floor better than one stat would.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Atlanta sit at Offensive Rating 78.6 with QB Stability 77.7 and Roster Strength 77.8. Those three numbers explain the offensive floor better than one stat would.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Indianapolis sit at Offensive Rating 78.3 with QB Stability 77.0 and Roster Strength 74.9. Those three numbers explain the offensive floor better than one stat would.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Miami sit at Offensive Rating 78.0 with QB Stability 78.9 and Roster Strength 79.7. Those three numbers explain the offensive floor better than one stat would.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Pittsburgh sit at Offensive Rating 77.6 with QB Stability 75.8 and Roster Strength 79.9. Those three numbers explain the offensive floor better than one stat would.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Minnesota sit at Offensive Rating 76.6 with QB Stability 76.4 and Roster Strength 79.4. Those three numbers explain the offensive floor better than one stat would.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Arizona sit at Offensive Rating 76.0 with QB Stability 78.4 and Roster Strength 74.6. Those three numbers explain the offensive floor better than one stat would.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: New York sit at Offensive Rating 74.7 with QB Stability 70.3 and Roster Strength 73.8. Those three numbers explain the offensive floor better than one stat would.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Carolina sit at Offensive Rating 72.9 with QB Stability 75.1 and Roster Strength 70.9. Those three numbers explain the offensive floor better than one stat would.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: New York sit at Offensive Rating 72.7 with QB Stability 74.0 and Roster Strength 79.5. Those three numbers explain the offensive floor better than one stat would.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Las Vegas sit at Offensive Rating 72.3 with QB Stability 74.0 and Roster Strength 76.1. Those three numbers explain the offensive floor better than one stat would.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Cleveland sit at Offensive Rating 69.5 with QB Stability 67.0 and Roster Strength 76.7. Those three numbers explain the offensive floor better than one stat would.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: New Orleans sit at Offensive Rating 69.0 with QB Stability 69.2 and Roster Strength 71.9. Those three numbers explain the offensive floor better than one stat would.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Tennessee sit at Offensive Rating 68.8 with QB Stability 73.9 and Roster Strength 71.2. Those three numbers explain the offensive floor better than one stat would.
View Team DashboardPFM NFL Offense Ratings rank every team by its offensive outlook, not just one box-score stat. They combine the offense grade with quarterback stability, explosiveness, roster support and coaching context.
Teams are ordered by PFM Offensive Rating from highest to lowest. Supporting grades help explain why two offenses with similar ratings can be built very differently.
No. Traditional offensive stats describe production already recorded. PFM Offense Ratings are a broader team outlook that also accounts for quarterback stability, explosiveness, roster support and coaching context.
The quarterback changes the floor and ceiling of an offense. QB Stability helps show whether the offense has a trustworthy starting point before considering the rest of the roster.
Offensive coordinator context helps explain the environment around the offense, but PFM Offense Ratings are not an offensive coordinator ranking. The team-side grade remains the main number.
PFM ratings are reviewed when team data changes through the offseason, training camp and the regular season.
Current leaders from the ProFootballMania ratings.PFM Rankings
PFM Top Teams
View All →
QB Stability Leaders
View All →