Defensive Rating 89.6
PFM Defensive Rating
PFM Defensive Rating looks beyond yards allowed or points allowed. It is built to capture the broader defensive picture: roster strength, defensive performance indicators, coaching context, recent form and how much the defense supports the team’s overall outlook.
Last reviewed .
A strong defensive number means the roster, coaching context and recent performance indicators line up well enough to give the team real support on that side of the ball. It is not a defensive coordinator ranking, and it is not a copy of last year’s points allowed.
Defensive Rating 89.6
Seattle Seahawks, Los Angeles Rams, Houston Texans, Denver Broncos, Philadelphia Eagles
Roster Strength 85.5
Defense +14.7 over offense
Offense 86.6, defense 89.6
Teams are ranked by Defensive Rating first, with roster strength, coaching and recent performance beside it so the number has football context.
| #1 |
|
Elite Defensive Outlook: 89.6 | Strong Defensive Outlook: 85.5 | Elite Defensive Outlook: 87.8 | Elite Defensive Outlook: 91.8 | Elite Defensive Outlook: 91.3 | Elite Offensive Outlook: 86.6 | Elite Defensive Outlook | View Dashboard |
| #2 |
|
Elite Defensive Outlook: 86.2 | Strong Defensive Outlook: 85.0 | Elite Defensive Outlook: 87.6 | Elite Defensive Outlook: 90.7 | Elite Defensive Outlook: 90.6 | Elite Offensive Outlook: 88.0 | Elite Defensive Outlook | View Dashboard |
| #3 |
|
Strong Defensive Outlook: 85.8 | Solid Defensive Foundation: 80.3 | Solid Defensive Foundation: 81.0 | Elite Defensive Outlook: 89.1 | Strong Defensive Outlook: 84.8 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 79.1 | Strong Defensive Outlook | View Dashboard |
| #4 |
|
Strong Defensive Outlook: 84.6 | Solid Defensive Foundation: 80.4 | Strong Defensive Outlook: 85.0 | Strong Defensive Outlook: 85.9 | Strong Defensive Outlook: 84.9 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 81.3 | Strong Defensive Outlook | View Dashboard |
| #5 |
|
Strong Defensive Outlook: 84.4 | Strong Defensive Outlook: 83.8 | Strong Defensive Outlook: 82.4 | Strong Defensive Outlook: 82.5 | Elite Defensive Outlook: 86.1 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 84.1 | Strong Defensive Outlook | View Dashboard |
| #6 |
|
Strong Defensive Outlook: 84.2 | Defensive Questions: 76.7 | Major Defensive Concern: 73.0 | Major Defensive Concern: 67.4 | Major Defensive Concern: 71.4 | Major Offensive Concern: 69.5 | Strong Defensive Outlook | View Dashboard |
| #7 |
|
Strong Defensive Outlook: 83.8 | Strong Defensive Outlook: 84.3 | Elite Defensive Outlook: 92.3 | Defensive Questions: 75.6 | Elite Defensive Outlook: 87.1 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 83.2 | Strong Defensive Outlook | View Dashboard |
| #8 |
|
Strong Defensive Outlook: 83.8 | Solid Defensive Foundation: 80.4 | Strong Defensive Outlook: 85.0 | Elite Defensive Outlook: 87.7 | Strong Defensive Outlook: 85.9 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 83.4 | Strong Defensive Outlook | View Dashboard |
| #9 |
|
Strong Defensive Outlook: 83.4 | Solid Defensive Foundation: 79.9 | Strong Defensive Outlook: 83.2 | Solid Defensive Foundation: 79.3 | Solid Defensive Foundation: 79.1 | Offensive Questions: 77.6 | Strong Defensive Outlook | View Dashboard |
| #10 |
|
Strong Defensive Outlook: 82.3 | Solid Defensive Foundation: 79.3 | Strong Defensive Outlook: 85.6 | Solid Defensive Foundation: 79.5 | Strong Defensive Outlook: 84.0 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 82.4 | Strong Defensive Outlook | View Dashboard |
| #11 |
|
Strong Defensive Outlook: 82.0 | Solid Defensive Foundation: 80.4 | Solid Defensive Foundation: 80.0 | Elite Defensive Outlook: 88.5 | Strong Defensive Outlook: 83.2 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 80.7 | Strong Defensive Outlook | View Dashboard |
| #12 |
|
Solid Defensive Foundation: 81.9 | Strong Defensive Outlook: 85.3 | Strong Defensive Outlook: 84.7 | Strong Defensive Outlook: 84.7 | Elite Defensive Outlook: 87.2 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 85.1 | Solid Defensive Foundation | View Dashboard |
| #13 |
|
Solid Defensive Foundation: 81.2 | Strong Defensive Outlook: 82.1 | Major Defensive Concern: 72.5 | Elite Defensive Outlook: 86.3 | Strong Defensive Outlook: 85.5 | Elite Offensive Outlook: 90.5 | Solid Defensive Foundation | View Dashboard |
| #14 |
|
Solid Defensive Foundation: 80.5 | Strong Defensive Outlook: 85.0 | Strong Defensive Outlook: 85.7 | Solid Defensive Foundation: 80.1 | Elite Defensive Outlook: 86.8 | Elite Offensive Outlook: 88.5 | Solid Defensive Foundation | View Dashboard |
| #15 |
|
Solid Defensive Foundation: 80.5 | Solid Defensive Foundation: 81.3 | Major Defensive Concern: 71.3 | Defensive Questions: 77.3 | Solid Defensive Foundation: 80.9 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 85.3 | Solid Defensive Foundation | View Dashboard |
| #16 |
|
Solid Defensive Foundation: 80.2 | Solid Defensive Foundation: 79.4 | Strong Defensive Outlook: 82.2 | Solid Defensive Foundation: 79.9 | Solid Defensive Foundation: 78.8 | Offensive Questions: 76.6 | Solid Defensive Foundation | View Dashboard |
| #17 |
|
Solid Defensive Foundation: 78.5 | Solid Defensive Foundation: 81.0 | Strong Defensive Outlook: 83.2 | Solid Defensive Foundation: 78.8 | Strong Defensive Outlook: 83.7 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 85.9 | Solid Defensive Foundation | View Dashboard |
| #18 |
|
Solid Defensive Foundation: 78.1 | Major Defensive Concern: 71.9 | Major Defensive Concern: 72.0 | Major Defensive Concern: 71.5 | Major Defensive Concern: 70.6 | Major Offensive Concern: 69.0 | Solid Defensive Foundation | View Dashboard |
| #19 |
|
Solid Defensive Foundation: 78.0 | Solid Defensive Foundation: 78.6 | Defensive Questions: 76.6 | Defensive Questions: 76.7 | Solid Defensive Foundation: 78.3 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 80.8 | Solid Defensive Foundation | View Dashboard |
| #20 |
|
Defensive Questions: 77.9 | Solid Defensive Foundation: 79.5 | Major Defensive Concern: 72.8 | Major Defensive Concern: 65.5 | Major Defensive Concern: 73.6 | Major Offensive Concern: 72.7 | Defensive Questions | View Dashboard |
| #21 |
|
Defensive Questions: 77.8 | Solid Defensive Foundation: 79.8 | Strong Defensive Outlook: 82.9 | Solid Defensive Foundation: 78.7 | Strong Defensive Outlook: 82.2 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 82.8 | Defensive Questions | View Dashboard |
| #22 |
|
Defensive Questions: 77.5 | Defensive Questions: 77.8 | Defensive Questions: 74.5 | Defensive Questions: 76.0 | Defensive Questions: 76.8 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 78.6 | Defensive Questions | View Dashboard |
| #23 |
|
Defensive Questions: 76.2 | Major Defensive Concern: 73.8 | Solid Defensive Foundation: 81.2 | Major Defensive Concern: 71.1 | Major Defensive Concern: 73.3 | Offensive Questions: 74.7 | Defensive Questions | View Dashboard |
| #24 |
|
Defensive Questions: 75.8 | Solid Defensive Foundation: 80.2 | Solid Defensive Foundation: 79.3 | Major Defensive Concern: 68.3 | Solid Defensive Foundation: 79.1 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 82.4 | Defensive Questions | View Dashboard |
| #25 |
|
Defensive Questions: 75.2 | Defensive Questions: 74.9 | Major Defensive Concern: 73.4 | Solid Defensive Foundation: 80.7 | Defensive Questions: 76.1 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 78.3 | Defensive Questions | View Dashboard |
| #26 |
|
Defensive Questions: 75.1 | Defensive Questions: 76.1 | Major Defensive Concern: 73.6 | Major Defensive Concern: 66.7 | Major Defensive Concern: 72.7 | Major Offensive Concern: 72.3 | Defensive Questions | View Dashboard |
| #27 |
|
Defensive Questions: 74.6 | Major Defensive Concern: 70.9 | Major Defensive Concern: 70.8 | Major Defensive Concern: 74.0 | Major Defensive Concern: 72.5 | Major Offensive Concern: 72.9 | Defensive Questions | View Dashboard |
| #28 |
|
Major Defensive Concern: 73.9 | Solid Defensive Foundation: 79.3 | Major Defensive Concern: 73.7 | Major Defensive Concern: 70.7 | Defensive Questions: 77.5 | Elite Offensive Outlook: 86.0 | Major Defensive Concern | View Dashboard |
| #29 |
|
Major Defensive Concern: 73.0 | Solid Defensive Foundation: 80.6 | Major Defensive Concern: 73.8 | Major Defensive Concern: 70.8 | Solid Defensive Foundation: 79.3 | Strong Offensive Outlook: 84.2 | Major Defensive Concern | View Dashboard |
| #30 |
|
Major Defensive Concern: 72.7 | Solid Defensive Foundation: 79.7 | Major Defensive Concern: 72.5 | Major Defensive Concern: 68.7 | Defensive Questions: 75.3 | Solid Offensive Foundation: 78.0 | Major Defensive Concern | View Dashboard |
| #31 |
|
Major Defensive Concern: 72.5 | Defensive Questions: 74.6 | Major Defensive Concern: 71.9 | Major Defensive Concern: 68.3 | Major Defensive Concern: 73.7 | Offensive Questions: 76.0 | Major Defensive Concern | View Dashboard |
| #32 |
|
Major Defensive Concern: 72.3 | Major Defensive Concern: 71.2 | Defensive Questions: 74.8 | Major Defensive Concern: 67.5 | Major Defensive Concern: 71.2 | Major Offensive Concern: 68.8 | Major Defensive Concern | View Dashboard |
86.0 and higher
82.0 to 85.9
78.0 to 81.9
74.0 to 77.9
Below 74.0
Seattle start with a 89.6 Defensive Rating. Roster Strength at 85.5 gives the defense enough support to make the number feel like more than one hot category.
Defensive Rating at 84.2 gives the Browns a stronger starting point than the offense. Offensive Rating at 69.5 is the reason the team read is not fully balanced.
The defensive side lines up with the staff grade here. Defensive Rating sits at 89.6, and Coaching Direction at 87.8 gives Seattle a steadier foundation.
Seattle are not leaning on only one side of the ball. Offensive Rating 86.6 and Defensive Rating 89.6 both clear the strength line.
Seattle combine Defensive Rating 89.6, Roster Strength 85.5 and Coaching Direction 87.8. That is the kind of support that keeps a defense from being a one-category story.
View Team DashboardLos Angeles combine Defensive Rating 86.2, Roster Strength 85.0 and Coaching Direction 87.6. That is the kind of support that keeps a defense from being a one-category story.
View Team DashboardKansas City combine Defensive Rating 83.8, Roster Strength 84.3 and Coaching Direction 92.3. That is the kind of support that keeps a defense from being a one-category story.
View Team DashboardHouston combine Defensive Rating 85.8, Roster Strength 80.3 and Coaching Direction 81.0. That is the kind of support that keeps a defense from being a one-category story.
View Team DashboardSan Francisco combine Defensive Rating 81.9, Roster Strength 85.3 and Coaching Direction 84.7. That is the kind of support that keeps a defense from being a one-category story.
View Team DashboardCincinnati have pressure on the defensive side because Defensive Rating 73.0, Roster Strength 80.6, Recent Performance 70.8 leave little margin. The fix starts with steadier stops and more support for the offense.
View Team DashboardDallas have pressure on the defensive side because Defensive Rating 73.9, Roster Strength 79.3, Recent Performance 70.7 leave little margin. The fix starts with steadier stops and more support for the offense.
View Team DashboardArizona have pressure on the defensive side because Defensive Rating 72.5, Roster Strength 74.6, Recent Performance 68.3 leave little margin. The fix starts with steadier stops and more support for the offense.
View Team DashboardTennessee have pressure on the defensive side because Defensive Rating 72.3, Roster Strength 71.2, Recent Performance 67.5 leave little margin. The fix starts with steadier stops and more support for the offense.
View Team DashboardMiami have pressure on the defensive side because Defensive Rating 72.7, Roster Strength 79.7, Recent Performance 68.7 leave little margin. The fix starts with steadier stops and more support for the offense.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Seattle pair a top-end defensive number with roster support. Defensive Rating 89.6 and Roster Strength 85.5 give the defense a real floor.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Los Angeles pair a top-end defensive number with roster support. Defensive Rating 86.2 and Roster Strength 85.0 give the defense a real floor.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Houston sit at Defensive Rating 85.8 with Coaching Direction 81.0. That pairing explains why the defensive read is about more than raw talent.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Denver sit at Defensive Rating 84.6 with Coaching Direction 85.0. That pairing explains why the defensive read is about more than raw talent.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Philadelphia sit at Defensive Rating 84.4 with Coaching Direction 82.4. That pairing explains why the defensive read is about more than raw talent.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Cleveland lean on defense more than offense. Defensive Rating 84.2 is a strength, while Offensive Rating 69.5 keeps the team from reading as balanced.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Kansas City sit at Defensive Rating 83.8 with Coaching Direction 92.3. That pairing explains why the defensive read is about more than raw talent.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: New England sit at Defensive Rating 83.8 with Coaching Direction 85.0. That pairing explains why the defensive read is about more than raw talent.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Pittsburgh lean on defense more than offense. Defensive Rating 83.4 is a strength, while Offensive Rating 77.6 keeps the team from reading as balanced.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Los Angeles sit at Defensive Rating 82.3 with Coaching Direction 85.6. That pairing explains why the defensive read is about more than raw talent.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Jacksonville sit at Defensive Rating 82.0 with Coaching Direction 80.0. That pairing explains why the defensive read is about more than raw talent.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: San Francisco sit at Defensive Rating 81.9 with Coaching Direction 84.7. That pairing explains why the defensive read is about more than raw talent.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Buffalo sit at Defensive Rating 81.2 with Coaching Direction 72.5. That pairing explains why the defensive read is about more than raw talent.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Detroit sit at Defensive Rating 80.5 with Coaching Direction 85.7. That pairing explains why the defensive read is about more than raw talent.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Baltimore sit at Defensive Rating 80.5 with Coaching Direction 71.3. That pairing explains why the defensive read is about more than raw talent.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Minnesota sit at Defensive Rating 80.2 with Coaching Direction 82.2. That pairing explains why the defensive read is about more than raw talent.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Green Bay sit at Defensive Rating 78.5 with Coaching Direction 83.2. That pairing explains why the defensive read is about more than raw talent.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: New Orleans sit at Defensive Rating 78.1 with Coaching Direction 72.0. That pairing explains why the defensive read is about more than raw talent.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Tampa Bay sit at Defensive Rating 78.0 with Coaching Direction 76.6. That pairing explains why the defensive read is about more than raw talent.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: New York sit at Defensive Rating 77.9 with Coaching Direction 72.8. That pairing explains why the defensive read is about more than raw talent.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Chicago sit at Defensive Rating 77.8 with Coaching Direction 82.9. That pairing explains why the defensive read is about more than raw talent.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Atlanta sit at Defensive Rating 77.5 with Coaching Direction 74.5. That pairing explains why the defensive read is about more than raw talent.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: New York sit at Defensive Rating 76.2 with Coaching Direction 81.2. That pairing explains why the defensive read is about more than raw talent.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Washington sit at Defensive Rating 75.8 with Coaching Direction 79.3. That pairing explains why the defensive read is about more than raw talent.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Indianapolis sit at Defensive Rating 75.2 with Coaching Direction 73.4. That pairing explains why the defensive read is about more than raw talent.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Las Vegas sit at Defensive Rating 75.1 with Coaching Direction 73.6. That pairing explains why the defensive read is about more than raw talent.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Carolina sit at Defensive Rating 74.6 with Coaching Direction 70.8. That pairing explains why the defensive read is about more than raw talent.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Dallas sit at Defensive Rating 73.9 with Coaching Direction 73.7. That pairing explains why the defensive read is about more than raw talent.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Cincinnati sit at Defensive Rating 73.0 with Coaching Direction 73.8. That pairing explains why the defensive read is about more than raw talent.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Miami sit at Defensive Rating 72.7 with Coaching Direction 72.5. That pairing explains why the defensive read is about more than raw talent.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Arizona sit at Defensive Rating 72.5 with Coaching Direction 71.9. That pairing explains why the defensive read is about more than raw talent.
View Team DashboardWhat the numbers say: Tennessee sit at Defensive Rating 72.3 with Coaching Direction 74.8. That pairing explains why the defensive read is about more than raw talent.
View Team DashboardPFM NFL Defense Ratings rank every team by its defensive outlook, not just one traditional stat. They use the defensive grade with roster strength, coaching context, recent performance and team balance.
Teams are ordered by PFM Defensive Rating from highest to lowest. Supporting grades help explain why two defenses with similar ratings may be in very different team situations.
No. Traditional defensive stats describe production already recorded. PFM Defense Ratings are a broader outlook that also considers roster support, coaching context and how the defense fits the full team.
Defense depends on more than one star player. Roster Strength helps show whether the front, coverage group and depth give the defense enough answers over a full season.
Defensive coordinator context helps explain the setup around the defense, but PFM Defense Ratings are not a defensive coordinator ranking. The team-side grade remains the starting point.
PFM ratings are reviewed when team data changes through the offseason, training camp and the regular season.
Current leaders from the ProFootballMania ratings.PFM Rankings
PFM Top Teams
View All →
QB Stability Leaders
View All →