Why Seattle Is No. 1
Seattle earns No. 1 with the league's top defense and the league's top franchise direction. QB Stability ranks No. 12, which is solid but still the biggest question in an otherwise elite profile.
Open team dashboardPrivacy at PFM
PFM uses necessary storage to run the site and remember your privacy choice. Jetpack Stats measures basic site traffic separately. Optional analytics stay off unless you allow them.
Privacy PolicyRequired for core site functions and to remember your privacy choice.
The PFM Score answers two questions: How strong is this team, and how much should we trust it going forward? Quarterback stability carries the most weight, but the roster, coaching staff, recent play, offense, defense and franchise direction all matter.
This is not a copy of the standings. A good record can hide real problems, while a dangerous roster can be better than its win-loss mark. The goal is to show which teams have staying power.
The strongest teams in the current PFM model.
Seattle earns No. 1 with the league's top defense and the league's top franchise direction. QB Stability ranks No. 12, which is solid but still the biggest question in an otherwise elite profile.
Open team dashboard
Buffalo's No. 1 offense is the main reason the Bills are No. 7 overall. Coaching Direction is No. 26, which is why they do not rank higher.
Open team dashboard
Joe Burrow gives Cincinnati the No. 1 QB Stability grade, and the offense ranks No. 8. The Bengals are still No. 16 because the defense is No. 27. Burrow keeps them dangerous, but he cannot fix a defense that cannot get off the field.
Open team dashboardTap or click any column heading to sort the rankings.
| 1 |
Seattle Seahawks
▼
SEA
|
1-0 | PFM Team Score Major Strength: 91.1 -0.05 | QB Stability Strength: 84.5 | Roster Strength Strength: 85.0 | Coaching Direction Major Strength: 87.8 | Recent Performance Major Strength: 91.8 | Offense Strength: 85.4 | Defense Major Strength: 90.3 | Franchise Direction Strength: 83.2 | Super Bowl Favorite | -0.05Seattle moved lower despite a 13-10 Week 1 win, as declines in Offense Strength and Defense Strength outweighed a gain in Roster Strength.Sep 15, 2026 |
| 2 3 → 2 |
Kansas City Chiefs
▲
KC
|
1-0 | PFM Team Score Major Strength: 88.5 +0.68 | QB Stability Major Strength: 87.1 | Roster Strength Strength: 85.0 | Coaching Direction Major Strength: 92.6 | Recent Performance Watch: 78.0 | Offense Strength: 83.5 | Defense Strength: 84.9 | Franchise Direction Watch: 80.1 | Super Bowl Favorite | +0.68The Chiefs' score moved up after a 31-10 Week 1 win, as gains in Recent Performance and Defense Strength outweighed declines in QB Stability.Sep 15, 2026 |
| 3 2 → 3 |
Los Angeles Rams
▼
LAR
|
0-1 | PFM Team Score Major Strength: 87.9 -2.37 | QB Stability Strength: 85.1 | Roster Strength Strength: 83.7 | Coaching Direction Major Strength: 87.6 | Recent Performance Strength: 84.5 | Offense Major Strength: 86.0 | Defense Strength: 85.0 | Franchise Direction Concern: 77.5 | Super Bowl Contender | -2.37Los Angeles moved lower after a 27-7 Week 1 loss, and Myles Garrett's knee surgery and move to injured reserve further lowered the Rams' Roster Strength and Defense Strength grades.Sep 15, 2026 |
| 4 |
San Francisco 49ers
▲
SF
|
1-0 | PFM Team Score Major Strength: 86.8 +0.23 | QB Stability Strength: 85.5 | Roster Strength Strength: 83.8 | Coaching Direction Strength: 85.0 | Recent Performance Strength: 85.2 | Offense Strength: 85.2 | Defense Strength: 82.1 | Franchise Direction Concern: 75.5 | Super Bowl Contender | +0.23San Francisco's rating improved after a 27-7 Week 1 win, led by gains in Defense Strength and Recent Performance.Sep 15, 2026 |
| 5 6 → 5 |
Philadelphia Eagles
▲
PHI
|
1-0 | PFM Team Score Major Strength: 86.3 +0.05 | QB Stability Strength: 85.5 | Roster Strength Strength: 84.1 | Coaching Direction Strength: 82.4 | Recent Performance Strength: 82.3 | Offense Strength: 84.9 | Defense Strength: 84.4 | Franchise Direction Watch: 80.9 | Super Bowl Contender | +0.05The Eagles' score moved up after a 24-22 Week 1 win, as gains in Roster Strength outweighed declines in Defense Strength.Sep 15, 2026 |
| 6 5 → 6 |
Detroit Lions
▼
DET
|
1-0 | PFM Team Score Major Strength: 86.3 -0.25 | QB Stability Strength: 85.0 | Roster Strength Strength: 84.0 | Coaching Direction Strength: 85.7 | Recent Performance Watch: 80.2 | Offense Major Strength: 88.4 | Defense Watch: 80.1 | Franchise Direction Watch: 80.6 | Super Bowl Contender | -0.25The Lions' rating fell despite a 31-30 Week 1 win, led by declines in QB Stability and Offense Strength.Sep 15, 2026 |
| 7 |
Buffalo Bills
▲
BUF
|
1-0 | PFM Team Score Strength: 85.7 +0.05 | QB Stability Major Strength: 88.0 | Roster Strength Strength: 82.7 | Coaching Direction Major Concern: 72.8 | Recent Performance Major Strength: 86.3 | Offense Major Strength: 91.4 | Defense Watch: 80.7 | Franchise Direction Concern: 77.8 | Playoff Contender | +0.05The Bills' score moved up after a 36-31 Week 1 win, as gains in Roster Strength and Coaching Direction outweighed declines in Defense Strength.Sep 15, 2026 |
| 8 |
New England Patriots
▼
NE
|
0-1 | PFM Team Score Strength: 84.1 -1.13 | QB Stability Strength: 83.7 | Roster Strength Watch: 78.2 | Coaching Direction Strength: 85.0 | Recent Performance Strength: 84.8 | Offense Strength: 82.2 | Defense Strength: 83.0 | Franchise Direction Watch: 78.0 | Playoff Contender | -1.13The Patriots' rating fell after a 13-10 Week 1 loss, led by declines in Recent Performance and Offense Strength.Sep 15, 2026 |
| 9 13 → 9 |
Chicago Bears
▲
CHI
|
1-0 | PFM Team Score Strength: 83.7 +0.57 | QB Stability Strength: 84.2 | Roster Strength Watch: 79.9 | Coaching Direction Strength: 82.9 | Recent Performance Watch: 80.4 | Offense Major Strength: 86.4 | Defense Watch: 80.0 | Franchise Direction Watch: 80.7 | Playoff Contender | +0.57Chicago's rating improved after a 59-37 Week 1 win, led by gains in Recent Performance and Offense Strength.Sep 15, 2026 |
| 10 14 → 10 |
Jacksonville Jaguars
▲
JAX
|
1-0 | PFM Team Score Strength: 83.3 +0.22 | QB Stability Strength: 82.2 | Roster Strength Watch: 79.4 | Coaching Direction Watch: 80.3 | Recent Performance Major Strength: 88.5 | Offense Strength: 82.0 | Defense Strength: 82.0 | Franchise Direction Concern: 76.7 | Playoff Contender | +0.22Jacksonville's rating improved after a 34-10 Week 1 win, led by gains in Offense Strength and Coaching Direction.Sep 15, 2026 |
| 11 9 → 11 |
Denver Broncos
▼
DEN
|
0-1 | PFM Team Score Strength: 82.9 -1.79 | QB Stability Strength: 82.7 | Roster Strength Watch: 80.5 | Coaching Direction Strength: 85.0 | Recent Performance Watch: 80.7 | Offense Watch: 78.4 | Defense Strength: 83.6 | Franchise Direction Watch: 78.2 | Playoff Contender | -1.79Denver moved lower after a 31-10 Week 1 loss, as declines in Recent Performance and Offense Strength outweighed a gain in Roster Strength.Sep 15, 2026 |
| 12 10 → 12 |
Los Angeles Chargers
▼
LAC
|
0-1 | PFM Team Score Strength: 82.7 -1.13 | QB Stability Major Strength: 86.3 | Roster Strength Watch: 78.2 | Coaching Direction Strength: 85.6 | Recent Performance Concern: 76.2 | Offense Watch: 81.9 | Defense Watch: 81.5 | Franchise Direction Concern: 76.3 | Playoff Contender | -1.13The Chargers' rating fell after a 26-14 Week 1 loss, led by declines in Recent Performance and Defense Strength.Sep 15, 2026 |
| 13 11 → 13 |
Houston Texans
▼
HOU
|
0-1 | PFM Team Score Strength: 82.7 -1.11 | QB Stability Strength: 82.2 | Roster Strength Watch: 78.7 | Coaching Direction Watch: 81.0 | Recent Performance Strength: 85.6 | Offense Watch: 79.5 | Defense Strength: 83.7 | Franchise Direction Watch: 80.3 | Playoff Contender | -1.11Houston moved lower after a 36-31 Week 1 loss, as declines in Recent Performance and Defense Strength outweighed a gain in Offense Strength.Sep 15, 2026 |
| 14 12 → 14 |
Green Bay Packers
▼
GB
|
0-1 | PFM Team Score Strength: 82.1 -1.11 | QB Stability Strength: 85.0 | Roster Strength Watch: 79.5 | Coaching Direction Strength: 83.0 | Recent Performance Concern: 75.6 | Offense Strength: 85.0 | Defense Watch: 78.2 | Franchise Direction Watch: 80.2 | Playoff Contender | -1.11The Packers' rating fell after a 39-22 Week 1 loss, led by declines in Recent Performance and QB Stability.Sep 15, 2026 |
| 15 |
Baltimore Ravens
▲
BAL
|
1-0 | PFM Team Score Watch: 81.9 +0.65 | QB Stability Strength: 85.7 | Roster Strength Watch: 81.3 | Coaching Direction Major Concern: 71.5 | Recent Performance Watch: 79.2 | Offense Major Strength: 86.4 | Defense Strength: 82.2 | Franchise Direction Watch: 78.7 | Playoff Contender | +0.65Baltimore's rating improved after a 41-23 Week 1 win, led by gains in Recent Performance and Defense Strength.Sep 15, 2026 |
| 16 |
Cincinnati Bengals
▲
CIN
|
1-0 | PFM Team Score Watch: 79.9 +0.41 | QB Stability Major Strength: 88.0 | Roster Strength Watch: 80.3 | Coaching Direction Major Concern: 73.8 | Recent Performance Major Concern: 73.3 | Offense Strength: 85.1 | Defense Concern: 74.9 | Franchise Direction Concern: 74.7 | In the Playoff Mix | +0.41The Bengals' score moved up after a 33-27 Week 1 win, as gains in Recent Performance and Defense Strength outweighed declines in QB Stability.Sep 15, 2026 |
| 17 |
Minnesota Vikings
▲
MIN
|
1-0 | PFM Team Score Watch: 79.1 +0.12 | QB Stability Concern: 76.0 | Roster Strength Watch: 79.2 | Coaching Direction Strength: 82.5 | Recent Performance Watch: 81.1 | Offense Concern: 77.4 | Defense Watch: 81.4 | Franchise Direction Concern: 76.8 | In the Playoff Mix | +0.12The Vikings' score moved up after a 39-22 Week 1 win, as gains in Recent Performance and Coaching Direction outweighed declines in QB Stability and Defense Strength.Sep 15, 2026 |
| 18 |
Pittsburgh Steelers
▲
PIT
|
1-0 | PFM Team Score Watch: 78.9 +0.07 | QB Stability Concern: 75.5 | Roster Strength Watch: 79.2 | Coaching Direction Strength: 83.2 | Recent Performance Watch: 80.1 | Offense Concern: 75.8 | Defense Strength: 83.9 | Franchise Direction Concern: 74.9 | In the Playoff Mix | +0.07The Steelers' score moved up after a 20-13 Week 1 win, as gains in Recent Performance and Roster Strength outweighed declines in Offense Strength and QB Stability.Sep 15, 2026 |
| 19 |
Washington Commanders
▲
WSH
|
0-1 | PFM Team Score Watch: 78.9 +0.21 | QB Stability Strength: 84.7 | Roster Strength Watch: 78.6 | Coaching Direction Watch: 79.3 | Recent Performance Major Concern: 69.3 | Offense Strength: 82.0 | Defense Concern: 76.1 | Franchise Direction Concern: 77.6 | In the Playoff Mix | +0.21Washington's rating improved despite a 24-22 Week 1 loss, led by gains in Defense Strength.Sep 15, 2026 |
| 20 |
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
▼
TB
|
0-1 | PFM Team Score Watch: 78.4 -0.27 | QB Stability Watch: 79.9 | Roster Strength Watch: 79.1 | Coaching Direction Concern: 76.6 | Recent Performance Concern: 75.7 | Offense Watch: 81.2 | Defense Watch: 78.9 | Franchise Direction Concern: 75.1 | In the Playoff Mix | -0.27The Buccaneers' rating fell after a 33-27 Week 1 loss, led by declines in Recent Performance and Defense Strength.Sep 15, 2026 |
| 21 |
Dallas Cowboys
▼
DAL
|
0-1 | PFM Team Score Concern: 77.2 -0.17 | QB Stability Watch: 81.6 | Roster Strength Watch: 78.7 | Coaching Direction Major Concern: 73.7 | Recent Performance Major Concern: 70.8 | Offense Strength: 84.9 | Defense Major Concern: 73.8 | Franchise Direction Concern: 74.1 | In the Playoff Mix | -0.17The Cowboys' rating fell after a 28-20 Week 1 loss, led by declines in Offense Strength and Defense Strength.Sep 15, 2026 |
| 22 |
Atlanta Falcons
▼
ATL
|
0-1 | PFM Team Score Concern: 76.2 -0.17 | QB Stability Concern: 77.1 | Roster Strength Concern: 77.1 | Coaching Direction Concern: 74.5 | Recent Performance Concern: 75.1 | Offense Concern: 77.2 | Defense Concern: 77.7 | Franchise Direction Concern: 75.4 | In the Playoff Mix | -0.17Atlanta moved lower after a 20-13 Week 1 loss, as declines in Offense Strength and Recent Performance outweighed a gain in Defense Strength.Sep 15, 2026 |
| 23 |
Indianapolis Colts
▼
IND
|
0-1 | PFM Team Score Concern: 75.6 -0.56 | QB Stability Concern: 76.8 | Roster Strength Concern: 75.3 | Coaching Direction Major Concern: 73.4 | Recent Performance Concern: 77.2 | Offense Watch: 78.1 | Defense Concern: 75.5 | Franchise Direction Major Concern: 72.9 | Needs More Help | -0.56Indianapolis moved lower after a 41-23 Week 1 loss, with Recent Performance accounting for most of the decline. Cam Taylor-Britt's return from suspension improved Roster Strength, but it was not enough to offset the result.Sep 15, 2026 |
| 24 |
Miami Dolphins
▼
MIA
|
0-1 | PFM Team Score Concern: 74.7 -0.38 | QB Stability Watch: 78.5 | Roster Strength Watch: 79.0 | Coaching Direction Major Concern: 72.5 | Recent Performance Major Concern: 67.6 | Offense Concern: 76.9 | Defense Major Concern: 73.0 | Franchise Direction Major Concern: 72.8 | Needs More Help | -0.38Miami moved lower after a 27-13 Week 1 loss, as declines in Recent Performance and Offense Strength outweighed a gain in Defense Strength.Sep 15, 2026 |
| 25 |
New York Jets
▲
NYJ
|
1-0 | PFM Team Score Concern: 74.4 +1.01 | QB Stability Concern: 74.4 | Roster Strength Watch: 79.0 | Coaching Direction Major Concern: 72.8 | Recent Performance Major Concern: 69.4 | Offense Concern: 74.1 | Defense Watch: 78.5 | Franchise Direction Concern: 75.0 | Needs More Help | +1.01New York's rating improved after a 23-10 Week 1 win, led by gains in Recent Performance and Offense Strength.Sep 15, 2026 |
| 26 27 → 26 |
Arizona Cardinals
▲
ARI
|
1-0 | PFM Team Score Concern: 74.3 +1.02 | QB Stability Watch: 78.5 | Roster Strength Major Concern: 73.8 | Coaching Direction Major Concern: 71.9 | Recent Performance Major Concern: 71.8 | Offense Concern: 76.5 | Defense Concern: 74.2 | Franchise Direction Major Concern: 73.1 | Needs More Help | +1.02Arizona's rating improved after a 26-14 Week 1 win, led by gains in Recent Performance and Defense Strength.Sep 15, 2026 |
| 27 26 → 27 |
New York Giants
▲
NYG
|
1-0 | PFM Team Score Major Concern: 74.0 +0.61 | QB Stability Major Concern: 71.2 | Roster Strength Major Concern: 73.5 | Coaching Direction Watch: 81.2 | Recent Performance Major Concern: 73.6 | Offense Concern: 75.0 | Defense Concern: 76.3 | Franchise Direction Major Concern: 69.9 | Needs More Help | +0.61New York's rating improved after a 28-20 Week 1 win, led by gains in Recent Performance and QB Stability.Sep 15, 2026 |
| 28 |
Las Vegas Raiders
▲
LV
|
1-0 | PFM Team Score Major Concern: 73.6 +0.91 | QB Stability Concern: 74.2 | Roster Strength Concern: 75.8 | Coaching Direction Major Concern: 73.6 | Recent Performance Major Concern: 70.4 | Offense Major Concern: 73.6 | Defense Concern: 76.9 | Franchise Direction Major Concern: 73.5 | Needs More Help | +0.91Las Vegas' rating improved after a 27-13 Week 1 win, led by gains in Recent Performance and Defense Strength.Sep 15, 2026 |
| 29 |
New Orleans Saints
▲
NO
|
0-1 | PFM Team Score Major Concern: 72.9 +0.20 | QB Stability Concern: 76.1 | Roster Strength Major Concern: 70.4 | Coaching Direction Concern: 76.0 | Recent Performance Major Concern: 72.1 | Offense Major Concern: 69.8 | Defense Concern: 77.7 | Franchise Direction Major Concern: 66.0 | Needs More Help | +0.20The Saints' score moved up despite a 31-30 Week 1 loss, as gains in Offense Strength outweighed declines in Defense Strength.Sep 15, 2026 |
| 30 |
Carolina Panthers
▼
CAR
|
0-1 | PFM Team Score Major Concern: 71.8 -0.35 | QB Stability Concern: 75.3 | Roster Strength Major Concern: 69.3 | Coaching Direction Major Concern: 70.6 | Recent Performance Major Concern: 71.2 | Offense Concern: 74.3 | Defense Major Concern: 73.7 | Franchise Direction Major Concern: 71.8 | Rebuilding or Major Concerns | -0.35Carolina moved lower after a 59-37 Week 1 loss, as declines in Recent Performance and Defense Strength outweighed gains in Offense Strength and QB Stability.Sep 15, 2026 |
| 31 32 → 31 |
Tennessee Titans
▼
TEN
|
0-1 | PFM Team Score Major Concern: 70.9 -0.07 | QB Stability Concern: 74.2 | Roster Strength Major Concern: 70.5 | Coaching Direction Concern: 74.8 | Recent Performance Major Concern: 66.6 | Offense Major Concern: 68.5 | Defense Major Concern: 72.4 | Franchise Direction Major Concern: 71.4 | Rebuilding or Major Concerns | -0.07Tennessee moved lower after a 23-10 Week 1 loss, as declines in Recent Performance and Offense Strength outweighed gains in Roster Strength and Defense Strength.Sep 15, 2026 |
| 32 31 → 32 |
Cleveland Browns
▼
CLE
|
0-1 | PFM Team Score Major Concern: 70.9 -0.50 | QB Stability Major Concern: 66.9 | Roster Strength Concern: 76.8 | Coaching Direction Major Concern: 72.8 | Recent Performance Major Concern: 66.0 | Offense Major Concern: 70.7 | Defense Watch: 80.9 | Franchise Direction Major Concern: 69.4 | Rebuilding or Major Concerns | -0.50Cleveland moved lower after a 34-10 Week 1 loss, as declines in Defense Strength and Recent Performance outweighed gains in Roster Strength and Offense Strength.Sep 15, 2026 |
See the average rank from major national outlets, every source position and the teams PFM places higher or lower.
A few points can be the difference between a team we trust in January and one that still has something to prove.
One of the NFL’s strongest, most complete teams and positioned to contend for the championship.
A legitimate championship threat with enough high-end strength to survive a deep January run.
A credible playoff team. The best teams in this range can make noise in January, but they are not yet in PFM’s championship tier.
Capable of competing for a playoff spot, although meaningful weaknesses remain.
Has some competitive pieces, but too many questions remain to project as a reliable playoff team.
Significant roster, quarterback, coaching or franchise-direction concerns limit the current outlook.
The formula starts with the quarterback because that position changes everything. From there, PFM grades the roster, coaching staff, recent results and the strength of both sides of the ball. Every team is judged on the same scale.
Standings show what already happened. PFM ratings look at the team behind the record and whether its success is built to last.
Quarterback changes matter most, but roster moves, coaching, injuries reflected in the data and recent performance can all move a rating.
Updates continue through the offseason, training camp and the regular season whenever the NFL picture changes.